Model 4396 Left Ventricular (LV) Lead Study (4396)

January 31, 2019 updated by: Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

Model 4396 Left Ventricular Lead Study

This study is designed to show that a new lead, which paces the left bottom chamber (left ventricle) of the heart, is safe and effective. Using a lead on the left side of the heart has been shown to potentially improve heart failure symptoms. The shape and size of this new lead may make it a good choice for patients or physicians.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized design. All consented patients who meet all inclusion and no exclusion criteria may receive the investigational lead. The study design has statistical power to show safety at one-month after implant. It also has statistical power to show effectiveness at one-month and three-months after implant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

197

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bendigo, Australia
      • Linz, Austria
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    • Ontario
      • Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
      • Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
      • Aarhus, Denmark
      • Nantes, France
      • Toulouse, France
      • Treviso, Italy
      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
    • California
      • Pasadena, California, United States
      • Sacramento, California, United States
    • Florida
      • Atlantis, Florida, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    • Illinois
      • Hinsdale, Illinois, United States
    • Iowa
      • Davenport, Iowa, United States
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States
    • Louisiana
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
      • Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
    • New York
      • Liverpool, New York, United States
      • New York, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • York, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States
    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • CRT/Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D) indications, New York Heart Association (NYHA) III and IV, indicated for implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) if CRT-D is implanted, patient consent, geographically stable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • LV lead implant attempt in last 30 days, unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction (MI) in past 30 days, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in past 3 months, contraindicated for transvenous pacing, heart transplant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Model 4396 LV Lead
Non-randomized study.
implant and follow-up of study device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety (Subjects Without a Model 4396 Lead Related Complication)
Time Frame: One month
A subject who was free of a Model 4396 lead related complication by the one month visit. All adverse events (AE) in the time frame were recorded at the subject's center and assessed by a centralized Adverse Event Advisory Committee (AEAC). The AEAC determined whether an AE was a complication and whether the event was related to the Model 4396 lead. A complication is an AE that results in death, termination of significant device function or invasive intervention (any therapy that penetrates the skin including administration of intramuscular (IM) and parenteral (IV) fluids).
One month
Efficacy: Distal Tip Electrode Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: One month
Subjects' distal tip electrode voltage threshold was collected at the one month visit. The Model 4396 was considered effective if the mean voltage threshold was less than 3.0 Volts. Voltage threshold was collected using LV tip to Right Ventricular (RV) coil configuration at 0.5 milliseconds [ms]. Voltage threshold is the minimum energy required from the device to consistently pace the ventricle.
One month
Efficacy: Proximal Ring Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: Three months
Subject's proximal ring electrode voltage threshold was collected at the three months visit. The Model 4396 was considered effective if the mean voltage threshold was less than 3.0 Volts.
Three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Model 4396 Lead
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
A successful implant occurs when the Model 4396 lead is implanted in a left ventricular vein and functions appropriately. A Model 4396 implant attempt was defined as any time when a Model 4396 lead was introduced into the body.
During implant procedure.
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Any Transvenous LV Lead After Cannulation
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
A successful implant after cannulation occurs when the coronary sinus (CS) is successfully cannulated and a left ventricular lead (any transvenous LV lead) is implanted in a left ventricular vein and functions appropriately. An implant attempt of any transvenous LV lead was defined as any time when a transvenous LV lead was introduced into the body.
During implant procedure.
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Any Transvenous LV Lead
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
A successful implant occurs when any transvenous LV lead is implanted in a left ventricular vein functions appropriately.
During implant procedure.
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Any Medtronic Attain Family LV Lead
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
A successful implant occurs when any Medtronic Attain Family LV Lead is implanted in a left ventricular vein and functions appropriately. The Attain Family leads include the following models: 4193, 4194, 4195, 4196, and 4396.
During implant procedure.
Cannulation Time
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
Cannulation time was defined as the time from insertion of the first coronary sinus (CS) cannulation catheter to the first successful CS cannulation.
During implant procedure.
Fluoroscopy Time
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
The total time the fluoroscope was imaging (not including biplane fluoroscopy time).
During implant procedure.
Model 4396 Lead Placement Time
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
Model 4396 lead placement time was defined as the time from insertion of the successfully implanted lead to the time when it was placed in the first acceptable pacing location.
During implant procedure.
Total Operation Time
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
Total operation time was defined as time from initial incision to final closure.
During implant procedure.
Assessment of Lead Handling Characteristics Reported as Acceptable
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
Implant lead handling characteristics were qualitatively assessed through physician feedback on the Implant Case Report Form (CRF). Physicians were asked for their overall assessment of the lead and results were categorized as acceptable or unacceptable. The number of acceptable responses are summarized.
During implant procedure.
Efficacy: Bipolar Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 1 month
Subjects' voltage threshold in the bipolar configuration was collected at the one month visit. The Model 4396 was considered effective if the mean voltage threshold (at 0.5 milliseconds [ms]) is less than or equal to 4.0 Volts.
1 month
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Tip Electrode: Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 6 month
Tip electrode voltage threshold at 0.5 ms was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits. Voltage threshold values at the 6 month visit are summarized.
6 month
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Tip Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Time Frame: 6 month
Subjects' tip electrode pacing impedance (a measure of electrical resistance) was measured at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits. Pacing impedance at the 6 month visit is presented here.
6 month
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Tip Electrode: Sensing
Time Frame: 6 month
Tip electrode sensing, measured by R-wave amplitude, for the Model 4396 was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits. Measurements at the 6 month visit are presented here. Sensing is the minimum energy produced by the left ventricle of the heart that the device can sense.
6 month
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Ring Electrode: Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 6 month
Ring electrode voltage threshold at 0.5 ms was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits. Voltage threshold at the 6 month visit is presented here.
6 month
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Ring Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Time Frame: 6 month
Subjects' ring electrode pacing impedance was measured at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits. Pacing impedance at the 6 month visit is presented here.
6 month
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Ring Electrode: Sensing
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
Ring electrode sensing, measured by R-wave amplitude, for the Model 4396 was collected only at the implant procedure because the devices allowed in this study are not programmable to collect sensing measurements using the ring electrode. The analyzer was used to collect measurements.
During implant procedure.
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Bipolar Configuration: Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 6 month
Bipolar voltage threshold at 0.5 ms was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits. Voltage threshold at the 6 month visit is reported here.
6 month
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Bipolar Configuration: Pacing Impedance
Time Frame: 6 month
Subjects' bipolar pacing impedance was measured at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits. Pacing impedance at the 6 month visit is presented here.
6 month
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Bipolar Configuration: Sensing
Time Frame: 6 month
Bipolar sensing, measured by R-wave amplitude, for the Model 4396 was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits. Measurements at the 6 month visit are presented here.
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Derek Exner, MD, Foothills Hospital (University of Calgary)
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Gras, MD, Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Pacing Lead

Subscribe