- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00853593
Model 4396 Left Ventricular (LV) Lead Study (4396)
January 31, 2019 updated by: Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Model 4396 Left Ventricular Lead Study
This study is designed to show that a new lead, which paces the left bottom chamber (left ventricle) of the heart, is safe and effective.
Using a lead on the left side of the heart has been shown to potentially improve heart failure symptoms.
The shape and size of this new lead may make it a good choice for patients or physicians.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This study is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized design.
All consented patients who meet all inclusion and no exclusion criteria may receive the investigational lead.
The study design has statistical power to show safety at one-month after implant.
It also has statistical power to show effectiveness at one-month and three-months after implant.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
197
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bendigo, Australia
-
-
-
-
-
Linz, Austria
-
-
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
-
-
Ontario
-
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-
Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
-
-
-
-
-
Aarhus, Denmark
-
-
-
-
-
Nantes, France
-
Toulouse, France
-
-
-
-
-
Treviso, Italy
-
-
-
-
-
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
-
-
-
-
California
-
Pasadena, California, United States
-
Sacramento, California, United States
-
-
Florida
-
Atlantis, Florida, United States
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
-
-
Illinois
-
Hinsdale, Illinois, United States
-
-
Iowa
-
Davenport, Iowa, United States
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
-
-
Kentucky
-
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
-
-
Louisiana
-
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
-
-
Minnesota
-
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
-
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
-
-
New York
-
Liverpool, New York, United States
-
New York, New York, United States
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
York, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States
-
-
West Virginia
-
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- CRT/Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D) indications, New York Heart Association (NYHA) III and IV, indicated for implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) if CRT-D is implanted, patient consent, geographically stable
Exclusion Criteria:
- LV lead implant attempt in last 30 days, unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction (MI) in past 30 days, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in past 3 months, contraindicated for transvenous pacing, heart transplant
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Model 4396 LV Lead
Non-randomized study.
|
implant and follow-up of study device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety (Subjects Without a Model 4396 Lead Related Complication)
Time Frame: One month
|
A subject who was free of a Model 4396 lead related complication by the one month visit.
All adverse events (AE) in the time frame were recorded at the subject's center and assessed by a centralized Adverse Event Advisory Committee (AEAC).
The AEAC determined whether an AE was a complication and whether the event was related to the Model 4396 lead.
A complication is an AE that results in death, termination of significant device function or invasive intervention (any therapy that penetrates the skin including administration of intramuscular (IM) and parenteral (IV) fluids).
|
One month
|
|
Efficacy: Distal Tip Electrode Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: One month
|
Subjects' distal tip electrode voltage threshold was collected at the one month visit.
The Model 4396 was considered effective if the mean voltage threshold was less than 3.0 Volts.
Voltage threshold was collected using LV tip to Right Ventricular (RV) coil configuration at 0.5 milliseconds [ms].
Voltage threshold is the minimum energy required from the device to consistently pace the ventricle.
|
One month
|
|
Efficacy: Proximal Ring Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: Three months
|
Subject's proximal ring electrode voltage threshold was collected at the three months visit.
The Model 4396 was considered effective if the mean voltage threshold was less than 3.0 Volts.
|
Three months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Model 4396 Lead
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
A successful implant occurs when the Model 4396 lead is implanted in a left ventricular vein and functions appropriately.
A Model 4396 implant attempt was defined as any time when a Model 4396 lead was introduced into the body.
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Any Transvenous LV Lead After Cannulation
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
A successful implant after cannulation occurs when the coronary sinus (CS) is successfully cannulated and a left ventricular lead (any transvenous LV lead) is implanted in a left ventricular vein and functions appropriately.
An implant attempt of any transvenous LV lead was defined as any time when a transvenous LV lead was introduced into the body.
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Any Transvenous LV Lead
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
A successful implant occurs when any transvenous LV lead is implanted in a left ventricular vein functions appropriately.
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Any Medtronic Attain Family LV Lead
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
A successful implant occurs when any Medtronic Attain Family LV Lead is implanted in a left ventricular vein and functions appropriately.
The Attain Family leads include the following models: 4193, 4194, 4195, 4196, and 4396.
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Cannulation Time
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
Cannulation time was defined as the time from insertion of the first coronary sinus (CS) cannulation catheter to the first successful CS cannulation.
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Fluoroscopy Time
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
The total time the fluoroscope was imaging (not including biplane fluoroscopy time).
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Model 4396 Lead Placement Time
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
Model 4396 lead placement time was defined as the time from insertion of the successfully implanted lead to the time when it was placed in the first acceptable pacing location.
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Total Operation Time
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
Total operation time was defined as time from initial incision to final closure.
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Assessment of Lead Handling Characteristics Reported as Acceptable
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
Implant lead handling characteristics were qualitatively assessed through physician feedback on the Implant Case Report Form (CRF).
Physicians were asked for their overall assessment of the lead and results were categorized as acceptable or unacceptable.
The number of acceptable responses are summarized.
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Efficacy: Bipolar Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Subjects' voltage threshold in the bipolar configuration was collected at the one month visit.
The Model 4396 was considered effective if the mean voltage threshold (at 0.5 milliseconds [ms]) is less than or equal to 4.0 Volts.
|
1 month
|
|
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Tip Electrode: Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Tip electrode voltage threshold at 0.5 ms was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits.
Voltage threshold values at the 6 month visit are summarized.
|
6 month
|
|
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Tip Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Subjects' tip electrode pacing impedance (a measure of electrical resistance) was measured at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits.
Pacing impedance at the 6 month visit is presented here.
|
6 month
|
|
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Tip Electrode: Sensing
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Tip electrode sensing, measured by R-wave amplitude, for the Model 4396 was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits.
Measurements at the 6 month visit are presented here.
Sensing is the minimum energy produced by the left ventricle of the heart that the device can sense.
|
6 month
|
|
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Ring Electrode: Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Ring electrode voltage threshold at 0.5 ms was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits.
Voltage threshold at the 6 month visit is presented here.
|
6 month
|
|
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Ring Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Subjects' ring electrode pacing impedance was measured at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits.
Pacing impedance at the 6 month visit is presented here.
|
6 month
|
|
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Ring Electrode: Sensing
Time Frame: During implant procedure.
|
Ring electrode sensing, measured by R-wave amplitude, for the Model 4396 was collected only at the implant procedure because the devices allowed in this study are not programmable to collect sensing measurements using the ring electrode.
The analyzer was used to collect measurements.
|
During implant procedure.
|
|
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Bipolar Configuration: Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Bipolar voltage threshold at 0.5 ms was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits.
Voltage threshold at the 6 month visit is reported here.
|
6 month
|
|
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Bipolar Configuration: Pacing Impedance
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Subjects' bipolar pacing impedance was measured at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits.
Pacing impedance at the 6 month visit is presented here.
|
6 month
|
|
Characterize Model 4396 Electrical Performance- Bipolar Configuration: Sensing
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Bipolar sensing, measured by R-wave amplitude, for the Model 4396 was collected at implant, pre-hospital discharge and all scheduled follow-up visits.
Measurements at the 6 month visit are presented here.
|
6 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Derek Exner, MD, Foothills Hospital (University of Calgary)
- Principal Investigator: Daniel Gras, MD, Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 27, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
March 2, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 18, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 31, 2019
Last Verified
January 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 116
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Umeå UniversityRegion NorrbottenNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureSweden
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicJapan, Netherlands, United States, Moldova, Romania
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Pacing Lead
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeActive, not recruiting
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedLeft Bundle-Branch Block | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionDenmark
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterMedtronic Bakken Research CenterCompletedHeart Failure | Sick Sinus Syndrome | Left Ventricular Dysfunction | Cardiac Conduction DefectNetherlands
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompleted
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompleted
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompleted
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompleted
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompletedHeart FailureItaly, Netherlands, Austria, Germany, Finland, India, Slovakia, Norway
-
Aarhus University Hospital SkejbyDanish Heart FoundationCompletedAtrioventricular BlockDenmark
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted