Acute and Chronic Effect of His-pacing in Consecutive Patients With AV-block

May 14, 2012 updated by: Mads Brix Kronborg, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Conventional right ventricular (RV) apical pacing may result in asynchronous ventricular contraction with delayed left ventricular activation, interventricular motion abnormalities, and worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction. His pacing is preserving a synchronous contraction and may prevent a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction.

Hypothesis: His-pacing preserves left ventricular function and is a feasable alternative compared to RV septal septal pacing in patients with AV-block.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Conventional right ventricular apical pacing may result in asynchronous ventricular contraction with delayed left ventricular activation, interventricular motion abnormalities, and worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction. His pacing is preserving a synchronous contraction and may prevent a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction.

The aims of our crossover, double-blinded, randomized study is to evaluate the feasibility and long-term safety of permanent His pacing and to compare the effects on left ventricular ejection fraction of permanent His pacing with those of conventional right septal stimulation after 12 months treatment in patients with 2nd or 3rd degree AV-block.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • AArhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Dept. of cardiology Skejby Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 2nd or 3rd degree Av block

Exclusion Criteria:

  • QRS > or = 120 ms
  • Indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
  • chronic atrial fibrillation
  • Pregnant
  • Expected heart surgery < 2 years
  • Expected survival > 2 years
  • Patients that have been His ablated
  • Serious comorbidity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Septal pacing
Septal lead will be activated.
Septal lead activated
Other Names:
  • Septal lead
Experimental: His-pacing
His lead will be activated 80 ms before septal lead
His lead will be activated 80 ms before septal lead
Other Names:
  • His lead

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Synchrony by echocardiography
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
New York Heart Association (NYHA) class
Time Frame: 12
12
6-minute hall walk test
Time Frame: 12
12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Torsten T Nielsen, Professor, Dept. B Skejby Hospital
  • Study Chair: Jens C Nielsen, Phycisian, Aarhus university Hospital Skajby
  • Principal Investigator: Mads B Kronborg, Phycisian, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrioventricular Block

Clinical Trials on Septal pacing

Subscribe