- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00856440
Safety and Efficacy of Routine Colonoscopy Preparations
July 15, 2010 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs
Periodic screening for colon cancer has become the standard of care in individuals over the age of 50.
In this context, it is generally accepted that colonoscopy is the most sensitive modality for the detection of colon cancer and/or pre malignant colon pathology.
As currently performed, however, colonoscopy requires that stool be eliminated from the colon before the examination.
If stool remains in the colon, visualization of the bowel will be partially or completely impaired and limits the effectiveness of the screening.
A number of methods are employed for purging the bowel of waste material but they generally involve either administration of a lavage (like a flush) solution (such as Colyte or Golytely) or of an osmotic laxative (such as sodium phosphate or magnesium citrate).
Neither of these approaches is uniformly effective in all individuals and neither is without potential complications, especially on the kidneys.
It is the intent of the proposed research to study the relative efficacy and safety of these preparations in both able-bodied individuals as well as people with spinal cord injury.
To this end, we will randomize these groups to a lavage solution, a laxative or a combination of the two prior to a routine, clinically indicated colonoscopy.
The quality of the preparation will be directly assessed during the colonoscopy and the effect of these preparations on kidney function will be determined.
We suspect that when it comes to preparation for colonoscopy, one shoe does not fit all sizes.
The proposed research should allow us to determine which form of preparation is least harmful while achieving optimal effectiveness.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Colonoscopy is a routine evaluation for screening of colorectal cancer in people over 50 and for those at increased genetic risk.
Despite the large number of individuals requiring such screening, there has been little randomized, controlled research to determine the relative renal safety of oral colon preparation solutions that are used to evacuate the bowel in patients with "normal" kidney function, the best frequency of laxative dosing (e.g. 1 day vs. 2 day), and the quality of the colon cleansing that results from these different approaches.
Reports of acute renal failure, secondary to nephrocalcinosis, following the commonly used oral phosphosoda preparation are increasingly recognized.
It is our belief that this project will yield clinically relevant information that would have immediate clinical application for all persons receiving a colonoscopy.
Since preparation for screening colonoscopy involves vigorous purging of stool from individuals without GI complaints, it also represents an opportunity to study the prevalence of clostridium difficile (C.
diff) in this population.
This may reveal important information regarding the epidemiology of this increasingly virulent and common enteric pathogen.
A pilot screening program for asymptomatic C. diff, a common nosocomial pathogen, may reveal findings of clinical importance for preventing spread of this infection, and allow use of presumptive treatment during periods of increased risk.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
330
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10468
- VA Medical Center, Bronx
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Veterans, SCI and able-bodied
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patients already clinically indicated for colonoscopy examination
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are not a candidate for elective colonoscopy (i.e. those with recent myocardial infarction, terminal illness, etc.)
- Patients who have a contraindication for Colyte (i.e. those with colonic obstruction, etc.)
- Patients who have a contraindication for Fleet OSPS (i.e. those with poor renal function, class 2 or greater symptomatic heart failure, etc.)
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
2
Able-bodied
|
Osmotic preparation for colonoscopy
Other Names:
Lavage preparation for colonoscopy
Other Names:
Combined, two-day preparation utilizing both preparations
|
|
1
SCI
|
Osmotic preparation for colonoscopy
Other Names:
Lavage preparation for colonoscopy
Other Names:
Combined, two-day preparation utilizing both preparations
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Renal Function (GFR, creatinine clearance)
Time Frame: <30 days
|
<30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Quality of bowel preparation (Ottawa Score)
Time Frame: <30 days
|
<30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 4, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
March 5, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
July 16, 2010
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 15, 2010
Last Verified
July 1, 2010
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- B4162C-1
- 2380-06-031
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruitingChronic Spinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) | Spinal Cord Injury | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | SCI | Subacute Spinal Cord InjurySwitzerland
-
Lian-Cing Yan, MSPTNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Stimulation | Spinal Cord Injury/Damage | Spinal Cord Injury Thoracic | Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) | Spinal Cord Injury T1-L2 | Epidural Electrical StimulationTaiwan
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingBeijing Pins Medical Co., Ltd; Beijing Xinzhida Neural Technology Co., Ltd; Hangzhou...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Motor Deficits | Gait Impairment | Gait Training | Spinal Cord Injury Cervical | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Motor Impairment | Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic | Spinal Cord Injury Thoracic | Spinal Cord Injury (Quadraplegia)China
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanThe Industrial Technology Research InstituteUnknownSpinal Cord Injuries | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryTaiwan
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruitingSpine Injury | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury | Cord Injury, Spinal | Cord Infarction Spinal
-
University of FloridaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedSCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Jill M. Wecht, Ed.D.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruitingBlood Pressure | Spinal Cord Injuries | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Blood Pressure Disorders | Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury | Acute Spinal Cord Injury | Neuromodulation | Spinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
NervGen PharmaTerminatedSpinal Cord Injuries | Chronic Spinal Cord Injury | Subacute Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
MetroHealth Medical CenterNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury CervicalUnited States
-
Anne BrydenNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury Cervical | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Complete Lesion | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Incomplete LesionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Fleets Oral Sodium Phosphate Solution (OSPS)
-
Fundación SalutiaTecnoquimicas S.AUnknown
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesTerminatedFunctional ConstipationUnited States
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.CompletedColon CleansingUnited States
-
Taipei Medical University HospitalRecruiting
-
Taipei Medical University HospitalTerminated
-
University of StrathclydeUnknownOsteopenia of Prematurity | HypophosphataemiaUnited Kingdom
-
Inje UniversityCompletedBowel Preparation, Efficacy, Tolerability, SafetyKorea, Republic of
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Laboratoires Mayoly SpindlerCompletedColon CleansingSpain, France, Germany
-
G. d'Annunzio UniversityCompletedAcute Kidney Injury | Contrast Media ReactionItaly