- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00859768
The Effectiveness of the Screening Inventory of Psychosocial Problems (SIPP) in Cancer Patients
The Effectiveness of the Screening Inventory of Psychosocial Problems (SIPP) in Cancer Patients Treated With Radiotherapy.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: The Screening Inventory of Psychosocial Problems (SIPP) is a short, validated self-administered questionnaire to identify psychosocial problems in cancer patients. The one page 24-item questionnaire assesses physical complaints, psychological complaints, and social and sexual problems. There is very little known about the effectiveness of using the SIPP in consultation settings.
Aim: The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that using the SIPP may prevent underdiagnosis of early symptoms reflecting psychosocial problems, should facilitate communication between physicians and patients about psychosocial distress and may contribute to adequate referral to relevant psychosocial caregivers.
Methods: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trail (CRCT) is developed using a Solomon four-group design (two intervention and two control groups) to evaluate the effects of using the SIPP. Radiotherapists instead of patients are at random allocated to experimental or control groups. All included patients are randomized into the groups with and without pre-measurement. Psychosocial distress, quality of life, patients' satisfaction about communication with their radiotherapist during first consultation and the number and type of referred patients to psychosocial caregivers are assessed. Self-administered assessments are conducted at four times: pre-test before first consultation (T1), and post-tests directly following the first consultation (T2), three months (T3) and one year after (T4) the first measurement. Medical information are gathered from patients' medical records. Furthermore, a process evaluation is carried out.
Relevance: Using the SIPP may lead to a reduction of psychosocial problems and better quality of life, both on the short and long term. If the SIPP proves to be effective, the results of this project may contribute to motivate health care workers to use the SIPP as a standard method for early detection of psychosocial distress in oncology departments in the Netherlands and abroad.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Brabant
-
Tilburg, Brabant, Netherlands, 5042 SB
- Institute Verbeeten
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Breast Cancer
- Lung Cancer
- Prostate cancer
- Bladder Cancer
- Colorectal Cancer
- Cervix Cancer
- Cancer of endometrium
- Cancer of Skin
- Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Must receive radiotherapy treatment (RT)
- 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria:
- Metastases
- Less than 10 fractions of radiotherapy treatment (RT)
- Unable to read, and speak Dutch
- Unable to complete questionnaires
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group 1
Pre-test measures are assessed.
The patient receives the SIPP twice during their RT period.
The first time is before the first consultation with the radiotherapist and the second time is before the last consultation at the end of the RT period.
At both time points, the SIPP is handed over to the radiotherapist at the start of the consultation.
The radiotherapist screens the scores of the SIPP to get an overview of potential psychosocial problems and patient's needs of psychosocial care.
Follow-up measures are directly after first consultation (T2) and at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
|
The patient receives the SIPP at two different time points during their RT period.
The first time point is before the first consultation with the radiotherapist (before starting RT) and the second time point is before the last consultation with the radiotherapist at the end of the RT period.
At both time points, the SIPP is handed over to the radiotherapist at the start of the consultation.
The radiotherapist screens the scores of the SIPP to get an overview of potential psychosocial problems and patient's needs of psychosocial care.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Intervention group 2
No pre-test measures are assessed.
The patient receives the SIPP twice during their RT period.
The first time is before the first consultation with the radiotherapist and the second time is before the last consultation at the end of the RT period.
At both time points, the SIPP is handed over to the radiotherapist at the start of the consultation.
The radiotherapist screens the scores of the SIPP to get an overview of potential psychosocial problems and patient's needs of psychosocial care.
Follow-up measures are directly after first consultation (T2) and at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
|
The patient receives the SIPP at two different time points during their RT period.
The first time point is before the first consultation with the radiotherapist (before starting RT) and the second time point is before the last consultation with the radiotherapist at the end of the RT period.
At both time points, the SIPP is handed over to the radiotherapist at the start of the consultation.
The radiotherapist screens the scores of the SIPP to get an overview of potential psychosocial problems and patient's needs of psychosocial care.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Control group 1
Pre-test measures are assessed.
Enhanced usual care.
Follow-up measures are directly after first consultation (T2) and at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
|
|
|
No Intervention: Control group 2
No pre-test measures are assessed.
Enhanced usual care.
Follow-up measures are directly after first consultation (T2) and at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
The primary effect outcome measurement is the number and type of referred patients with psychosocial problems to psychosocial caregivers and type of referrals with respect to psychosocial problems.
Time Frame: Is measured at three (T3) and twelve (T4) months after first measurement
|
Is measured at three (T3) and twelve (T4) months after first measurement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
The secondary outcome measurements are patients' satisfaction with the radiotherapist-patient communication, psychosocial distress and quality of life.
Time Frame: Patients' satisfaction with the radiotherapist-patient communication is measured after first consultation with radiotherapist (T2) and psychosocial distress and quality of life is measured at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
|
Patients' satisfaction with the radiotherapist-patient communication is measured after first consultation with radiotherapist (T2) and psychosocial distress and quality of life is measured at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lilian Lechner, PhD, Netherlands Open University, Faculty of Psychology
- Principal Investigator: Gertrudis I Kempen, PhD, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and life Sciences, Department of Health Care and Nursing Science, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI)
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Braeken AP, Kempen GI, Eekers D, van Gils FC, Houben RM, Lechner L. The usefulness and feasibility of a screening instrument to identify psychosocial problems in patients receiving curative radiotherapy: a process evaluation. BMC Cancer. 2011 Nov 8;11:479. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-479.
- Braeken AP, Lechner L, van Gils FC, Houben RM, Eekers D, Ambergen T, Kempen G. The effectiveness of the Screening Inventory of Psychosocial Problems (SIPP) in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: design of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2009 Jun 9;9:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-177.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MB254
- Dutch Cancer Society (Registry Identifier: 2008-4008)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer
-
Baylor Breast Care CenterRecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasm | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms | HER2-positive Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer Stage II | Breast Cancer Female | Breast Cancer Stage III | Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer InvasiveUnited States
-
Innocrin PharmaceuticalCompletedBreast Cancer | Advanced Breast Cancer | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | ER+ Breast Cancer | Cancer of the BreastUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityEisai Inc.UnknownMale Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative...United States
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedInflammatory Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-positive Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedStage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedMale Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedMale Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerCanada
-
Mayo ClinicMarker Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedHER2-positive Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Central FloridaFlorida Department of HealthRecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Cancer Female | Breast Cancer Diagnosis | Breast Cancer Survivors | Breast Cancer Detection | Breast Cancer AwarenessUnited States
Clinical Trials on Questionnaire administration
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompleted
-
Centre Oscar LambretCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconTerminated
-
Istanbul Aydın UniversityCompleted
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedHealth Status UnknownUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedBreast Carcinoma | Fallopian Tube Carcinoma | Endometrial Carcinoma | Ovarian Carcinoma | Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma | Deleterious CDH1 Gene Mutation | Deleterious DICER1 Gene Mutation | Deleterious SMARCA4 Gene Mutation | Deleterious STK11 Gene MutationUnited States
-
Université Catholique de LouvainRecruiting
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingHematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm | Malignant Solid NeoplasmUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingCOVID-19 InfectionUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingEndometrial Carcinoma | Malignant Uterine Neoplasm | Uterine Corpus Cancer | Uterine Corpus SarcomaUnited States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)CompletedBreast Cancer | Prostate CancerUnited States