- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00867035
Bad Breath Response to Tongue Scraper and Rinses
May 15, 2013 updated by: University of California, San Francisco
Bad Breath Response to Tongue Scraper and Rinses, a Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Clinical Trial.
Medical center personnel were screened organoleptically for bad breath by 2 investigators using Rosenberg scale 0-5, and measurement of breath sample in portable gas chromatograph.
With a threshold score of 2 or more, or 75parts per billion(ppb) hydrogen sulfide(H2S), subjects invited to enter clinical trial of the mechanical effect of daily tongue scraping with the adjunctive use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash or 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide mouthwash.
Subjects randomly assigned in double-blind trial for one week.
The null hypothesis is there will be no difference between the two rinses as adjuncts to tongue scraping.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Subjects in trial had oral and periodontal exam and scored the Ramfjord teeth(#3, 9, 12, 19, 25, 28) for Plaque Index(PlI), Gingival Index(GI), probing depth (PD), recession.
A tongue coating index is scored and sample of coating on dorsum taken for culture of total viable count and percentage of black sulfide-producing colonies on anaerobe agar with lead acetate added.
Subjects given hygiene instruction and instruction on use of scraper, then rinse with 20ml assigned mouthwash 30sec.
Breath assessed by organoleptic means and mouth air sample concentration of hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan in portable gas chromatograph at 0, 1, 2, and 4 hours.
Subjects use scraper and mouthwash twice daily for one week and return for final exam.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
22
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
- UCaliforniaSF
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult with threshold score of 2 on organoleptic halitosis evaluation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Taking another experimental drug, or antibiotic.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Chlorhexidine gluconate and scraper
The intervention was accomplished by subject after instructions from investigator: twice a day a tongue scraper was used with 4 or more strokes, followed by 20ml of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash used for 30 sec, for one week.
|
The intervention was accomplished by subject after instructions by investigator: twice a day the scraper was used for 4 strokes then 20ml 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate rinse for 30sec, for one week.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Chlorine dioxide and scraper
The intervention was accomplished by subject after instructions by investigator: twice a day the scraper was used for 4 strokes then 20ml 0.1% stabilized chlor8ine dioxide rinse for 30sec, for one week.
|
20ml of mouthwash used for 30sec as adjunct to tongue scraper twice a day
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Rosenberg Score at Indicated Time Points
Time Frame: baseline, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 1 week
|
2 investigators are trained to evaluate smell using the Rosenberg scale which measures foul smelling breath.
The Rosenberg scale is validated and is scored 0-5 with 0= no bad breath, 5=worst bad breath.
A score of 2 is the threshold at which bad breath is determined.
|
baseline, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 1 week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) in Mouth Air at 1 Hour
Time Frame: 1hr
|
Using portable gas chromatograph
|
1hr
|
|
Concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) in Mouth Air at 2 Hours
Time Frame: 2hr
|
Using portable gas chromatograph
|
2hr
|
|
Concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) in Mouth Air at 4 Hours
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Using portable gas chromatograph
|
4 hours
|
|
Concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) in Mouth Air at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Using portable gas chromatograph
|
1 week
|
|
Concentration of Methyl Mercaptan (MM) in Mouth Air at 1 Hour
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Using portable gas chromatograph
|
1 hour
|
|
Concentration of Methyl Mercaptan (MM) in Mouth Air at 2 Hours
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Using portable gas chromatograph
|
2 hours
|
|
Concentration of Methyl Mercaptan (MM) in Mouth Air at 4 Hours
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Using portable gas chromatograph
|
4 hours
|
|
Concentration of Methyl Mercaptan (MM) in Mouth Air at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Using portable gas chromatograph
|
1 week
|
|
Number of Bacteria on Tongue at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Total viable count(TVC) in colony forming units(CFU) on anaerobe agar
|
1 week
|
|
Percentage of Sulfide-producing Black Colonies Out of Total Viable Count(TVC) on Anaerobe Agar Containing Lead Acetate
Time Frame: 1 week
|
1 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Milton R Wirthlin, DDS, University of California, San Francisco
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 20, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
March 23, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
May 16, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 15, 2013
Last Verified
May 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PGP1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.