Bad Breath Response to Tongue Scraper and Rinses

Bad Breath Response to Tongue Scraper and Rinses, a Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Clinical Trial.

Medical center personnel were screened organoleptically for bad breath by 2 investigators using Rosenberg scale 0-5, and measurement of breath sample in portable gas chromatograph. With a threshold score of 2 or more, or 75parts per billion(ppb) hydrogen sulfide(H2S), subjects invited to enter clinical trial of the mechanical effect of daily tongue scraping with the adjunctive use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash or 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide mouthwash. Subjects randomly assigned in double-blind trial for one week. The null hypothesis is there will be no difference between the two rinses as adjuncts to tongue scraping.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects in trial had oral and periodontal exam and scored the Ramfjord teeth(#3, 9, 12, 19, 25, 28) for Plaque Index(PlI), Gingival Index(GI), probing depth (PD), recession. A tongue coating index is scored and sample of coating on dorsum taken for culture of total viable count and percentage of black sulfide-producing colonies on anaerobe agar with lead acetate added. Subjects given hygiene instruction and instruction on use of scraper, then rinse with 20ml assigned mouthwash 30sec. Breath assessed by organoleptic means and mouth air sample concentration of hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan in portable gas chromatograph at 0, 1, 2, and 4 hours. Subjects use scraper and mouthwash twice daily for one week and return for final exam.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • UCaliforniaSF

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult with threshold score of 2 on organoleptic halitosis evaluation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking another experimental drug, or antibiotic.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Chlorhexidine gluconate and scraper
The intervention was accomplished by subject after instructions from investigator: twice a day a tongue scraper was used with 4 or more strokes, followed by 20ml of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash used for 30 sec, for one week.
The intervention was accomplished by subject after instructions by investigator: twice a day the scraper was used for 4 strokes then 20ml 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate rinse for 30sec, for one week.
Other Names:
  • "Peridex"
Experimental: Chlorine dioxide and scraper
The intervention was accomplished by subject after instructions by investigator: twice a day the scraper was used for 4 strokes then 20ml 0.1% stabilized chlor8ine dioxide rinse for 30sec, for one week.
20ml of mouthwash used for 30sec as adjunct to tongue scraper twice a day
Other Names:
  • "CloSYS"

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Rosenberg Score at Indicated Time Points
Time Frame: baseline, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 1 week
2 investigators are trained to evaluate smell using the Rosenberg scale which measures foul smelling breath. The Rosenberg scale is validated and is scored 0-5 with 0= no bad breath, 5=worst bad breath. A score of 2 is the threshold at which bad breath is determined.
baseline, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) in Mouth Air at 1 Hour
Time Frame: 1hr
Using portable gas chromatograph
1hr
Concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) in Mouth Air at 2 Hours
Time Frame: 2hr
Using portable gas chromatograph
2hr
Concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) in Mouth Air at 4 Hours
Time Frame: 4 hours
Using portable gas chromatograph
4 hours
Concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) in Mouth Air at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
Using portable gas chromatograph
1 week
Concentration of Methyl Mercaptan (MM) in Mouth Air at 1 Hour
Time Frame: 1 hour
Using portable gas chromatograph
1 hour
Concentration of Methyl Mercaptan (MM) in Mouth Air at 2 Hours
Time Frame: 2 hours
Using portable gas chromatograph
2 hours
Concentration of Methyl Mercaptan (MM) in Mouth Air at 4 Hours
Time Frame: 4 hours
Using portable gas chromatograph
4 hours
Concentration of Methyl Mercaptan (MM) in Mouth Air at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
Using portable gas chromatograph
1 week
Number of Bacteria on Tongue at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
Total viable count(TVC) in colony forming units(CFU) on anaerobe agar
1 week
Percentage of Sulfide-producing Black Colonies Out of Total Viable Count(TVC) on Anaerobe Agar Containing Lead Acetate
Time Frame: 1 week
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Milton R Wirthlin, DDS, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 23, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe