Intra-operative Ketamine Infusions in Opioid-dependent Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain

September 21, 2018 updated by: Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Intra-operative Ketamine Infusions in Patients With Chronic Lower Back Discomfort Undergoing Laminectomies.

Noxious stimuli occurring intraoperatively and postoperatively generate central sensitization, decreasing pain thresholds and ultimately increasing analgesic requirements. The pathophysiology of central sensitization is thought to involve excitatory amino acid receptors such as N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) (1, 2). Ketamine is a N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that has been shown to be useful in the reduction of acute postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in a variety of surgical interventions (3).

Spine surgery provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the preemptive and preventative impact of ketamine on the primary end points of postoperative 24 and 48 hour opioid consumption in patients with chronic pain. The goal of this double blinded, prospective, randomized placebo controlled trial is to quantify the preemptive and preventative analgesic effects of ketamine infusions in this patient population. Such insight may lead to better pain control, improved satisfaction, and ultimately a reduction in side-effects related to postoperative opioid use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Noxious stimuli occurring intra-operatively and post-operatively generate central sensitization, decreasing pain thresholds and ultimately increasing analgesic requirements. The pathophysiology of central sensitization is thought to involve excitatory amino acid receptors that have been implicated in the prolongation of painful states in animal models. The N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor is one such excitatory amino acid receptor (1, 2).

The underlying mechanism of central sensitization is thought to involve c-fiber associated injury occurring with incision. Crile and Wall brought about the concept that attenuation of central sensitization could be accomplished via the provision of analgesic interventions (opioids, local anesthesia) prior to the noxious insult. They termed the central sensitization attenuation preemptive analgesia. The concept of preemptive analgesia was later expanded to implicate both pre and post-incisional noxious stimuli as part of this process, resulting in studies designed to provide interventions throughout the surgical intervention (peri-procedural) (3). Reduction in analgesic requirements or pain scores for more than five half-lives (1st order kinetics) following the provision of the intervening analgesic agent peri-procedurally is now known as preventative analgesia. The term preemptive analgesia is now reserved for interventions that occur only before the noxious stimuli.

Multiple studies have investigated the concepts of preemptive analgesia and preventative analgesia by providing a variety of analgesic interventions at various times throughout the surgical insult in addition to more conventional means of anesthesia provision, including opioids, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAID)s, Cyclooxygenase-II (COX-2) inhibitors, alpha-2 agonists, and ketamine (4, 5, 6). Preemptive and preventative analgesia using a variety of pharmacological agents with at least partially known mechanisms of actions has provided some insight into potential mechanisms of central sensitization.

Ketamine is a N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that has been shown to be useful in the reduction of acute postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in a variety of surgical interventions with variable routes of administration. It has also been shown to be effective in the presence and absence of opioids, suggesting that it has more than one mechanism of action in preemptive and preventative analgesia, including but not limited to decreasing central excitability, decreasing acute post-operative opioid tolerance, and a possible modulation of opioid receptors (7). Ketamine is a common anesthetic agent and has been in use since the Vietnam War. Clinically, ketamine provides pain relief with minimal respiratory depression, and at higher doses (1-2mg/kg) can induce general anesthesia while maintaining blood pressure and cardiac output.

Recently, a qualitative systematic review of the role of NMDA receptor antagonists was completed. Twenty-four studies investigating the role of ketamine met the inclusion criteria of the study, 58% of which demonstrated a preemptive or preventative analgesic effect. Patients underwent a variety of surgical procedures, both ambulatory and inpatient, and there was no obvious effect of either surgical type or dose of ketamine (range 0.15 to 1mg/kg) on the success of preventative intervention. However, the authors were unable to quantify the degree of reduction in primary end-points (opioid consumption, pain scores, both) due to variability in recording of such data. In addition, most inpatient studies were limited to abdominal procedures while the outpatient studies investigated mainly knee arthroscopies, providing no insight into the degree of impact of NMDA receptor antagonism in the setting of high pre-operative opioid tolerance combined with surgical procedures known to be associated with an invariably high degree of post-operative pain. Of note, only 1/24 studies documented a significant difference in side effects related to ketamine provision in patients who had received 20mg of epidural ketamine (7).

Laminectomy procedures provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the preemptive and preventative impact of ketamine on the primary end points of acute post-operative pain scores and opioid consumption in a patient population with opioid dependence and a high degree of post-operative and intra-operative noxious stimuli. The goal of this double blinded, randomized placebo controlled trial will be to test for the presence of, and quantify, the preemptive and preventative analgesic effects of ketamine infusions in this patient population. Such insight may lead to better pain control, improved satisfaction, and ultimately a reduction in side-effects related to post-operative opioid use including but not limited to respiratory depression, constipation, and delirium.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Laminectomy procedures.
  • History of chronic back pain.
  • Daily opioid use.
  • Capable of providing informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intolerance/allergy to ketamine.
  • Intolerance/true allergy to morphine.
  • Elevated intra-ocular pressure.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension.
  • Elevated intra-cranial pressure.
  • Any history of a psychosis.
  • Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ketamine
Peripheral provision of 0.5mg/kg of ketamine on induction followed by a 10mcg/kg/min infusion until surgical wound closure
Placebo Comparator: Normal saline
Normal saline at same rate as the previously described ketamine infusion (10mcg/kg/min), same amount of ketamine/placebo syringe on induction (0.5mg/kg).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine Consumption in the First 48 Hours After Surgery
Time Frame: 48 hours
Total morphine(mg)consumed at 48 hours.
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Duration
Time Frame: Discharge from hospital, approximately 2 days after surgery
Discharge from hospital, approximately 2 days after surgery
Hemodynamic Changes - Heart Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Inoperative (approximately) 48 hours
Hemodynamic change (Heart Rate) from baseline in the intraoperative and 48-h postoperative periods
Baseline, Inoperative (approximately) 48 hours
Hemodynamic Changes - Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, Inoperative (approximately) 48 hours
Hemodynamic change (Blood Pressure) from baseline in the intraoperative and 48-h postoperative periods
Baseline, Inoperative (approximately) 48 hours
Percentage of Participants With Complications/Adverse Events
Time Frame: 48 hours and 6 weeks
Adverse events
48 hours and 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey A Clark, MD, DHMC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 1. Wall PD. The prevention of postoperative pain. Pain 1988; 33: 289-90. 2. Katz J. George Washington Crile, anoci-association, and preemptive analgesia. Pain 1993;53: 243-5. 3. McQual HJ. Pre-emptive analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1992;69: 1-3. 4. Moiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology 2002;96: 725-41. 5. Katz J. Pre-emptive analgesia: evidence, current status and future directions. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl 995;10:8-13. 6. Katz J, McCartney CJ. Update on pre-emptive analgesia. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2002; 15: 435-41. 7. McCartney et al. A qualitative systematic review of the role of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor antagonists in preventative analgesia. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1385-1400. 8. Wu CT, Yeh CC, Yu JC, et al. Pre-incisional epidural ketamine, morphine and bupivacaine combined with epidural and general anesthesia provides pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44: 63-8.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Normal saline

Subscribe