- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00946101
A Study to Evaluate the Safety of HIN1 Monovalent Vaccine (MEDI3414) in Children 2 to 17 Years of Age (MI-CP217)
July 15, 2011 updated by: MedImmune LLC
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety of MEDI3414 in Children
The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and descriptive immunogenicity of the H1N1 influenza vaccine in healthy children.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and descriptive immunogenicity of a monovalent influenza virus vaccine containing a new 6:2 influenza virus reassortant in healthy children.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
326
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36608
- Coastal Clinic Research, Inc.
-
-
California
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
- Benchmark Research
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92103-6204
- California Research Foundation
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94102
- Benchmark Research
-
-
Kentucky
-
Bardstown, Kentucky, United States, 40004
- Kentucky Pediatric Research Center
-
Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40509
- Central Kentucky Research Associates, Inc.
-
-
Missouri
-
St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
- Sundance Clinical Research
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68134
- Meridian Clinical Research
-
-
Nevada
-
Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89105
- Clinical Research Center of Nevada
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14069
- Rochester Clinical Research Inc.
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15241
- Primary Physicians Research, Inc.
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Warwick, Rhode Island, United States, 02886
- Omega Medical Research
-
-
South Carolina
-
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 29303
- Spartanburg Medical Research
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
- Benchmark Research
-
Ft. Worth, Texas, United States, 76135
- Benchmark Research Ft. Worth
-
San Angelo, Texas, United States, 76904
- Benchmark Research San Angelo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
2 years to 17 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female, 2 to 17 years of age (not yet reached their 18th birthday) at the time of randomization
- Healthy by medical history and physical exam
- Written informed consent and any locally required authorization (eg, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA] in the United States of America [USA], European Union [EU] Data Privacy Directive in the EU and written informed assent) obtained from the subject/legal representative prior to performing any protocol-related procedures, including screening evaluations
- Females of child-bearing potential, (ie, unless premenarchal, surgically sterile [eg, bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy], has sterile male partner, or practices abstinence) must use an effective method of avoiding pregnancy (including oral, transdermal, or implanted contraceptives, intrauterine device, female condom with spermicide, diaphragm with spermicide, cervical cap, or use of a condom with spermicide by the sexual partner) for 30 days prior to the first dose of investigational product, and must agree to continue using such precautions for 60 days after the second dose of investigational product. In addition, the subject must also have a negative urine or blood pregnancy test at screening and, if screening and Day 1 do not occur on the same day, on the day of vaccination prior to randomization. Investigator judgment is required to assess the childbearing potential of a pre-adolescent or adolescent girl.
- Males, unless not sexually active, must use an effective method of birth control with a female partner and must agree to continue using such contraceptive precautions for at least 30 days after the second dose of investigational product (from Day 1 through Day 59 of the study)
- Subject's legal representative available by telephone
- Subject/subject's legal representative is able to understand and comply with the requirements of the protocol, as judged by the investigator
- Ability to complete follow-up period of 180 days after Dose 2 as required by the protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational product including egg or egg protein, gelatin or arginine, or serious, life-threatening, or severe reactions to previous influenza vaccinations
- History of hypersensitivity to gentamicin
- Any condition for which the inactivated influenza vaccine is indicated, including chronic disorders of the pulmonary or cardiovascular systems (eg, asthma), chronic metabolic diseases (eg, diabetes mellitus), renal dysfunction, or hemoglobinopathies that required regular medical follow-up or hospitalization during the preceding year
- Acute febrile (> 100.0°F oral or equivalent) and/or clinically significant respiratory illness (eg, cough or sore throat) within 14 days prior to randomization
- History of asthma, or in children < 5 years of age, history of recurrent wheezing
- Any known immunosuppressive condition or immune deficiency disease, including human immunodeficiency virus infection, or ongoing immunosuppressive therapy
- History of Guillain-Barré syndrome
- A household contact who is severely immunocompromised (eg, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient, during those periods in which the immunocompromised individual requires care in a protective environment); subject should additionally avoid close contact with severely immunocompromised individuals for at least 21 days after receipt of investigational product
- Receipt of any investigational agent within 30 days prior to randomization, or expected receipt through 30 days after the second dose of investigational product (use of licensed agents for indications not listed in the package insert is permitted)
- Use of aspirin or salicylate-containing products within 30 days prior to randomization or expected receipt through 30 days after final vaccination
- Expected receipt of antipyretic or analgesic medication (non-salicylate-containing) on a daily or every other day basis from randomization through 14 days after receipt of each dose of investigational product
- Administration of intranasal medications within 14 days prior to randomization, or expected receipt through 14 days after administration of each dose of investigational product
- Receipt of any nonstudy vaccine within 30 days before or after Dose 1 or expected receipt of any nonstudy vaccine within 30 days before or after Dose 2
- Known or suspected mitochondrial encephalomyopathy
- Adolescent subject is pregnant or a nursing mother
- Any condition (eg, chronic cough, allergic rhinitis) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with evaluation of the investigational product or interpretation of subject safety or study results
- Subject, legal representative, or immediate family member of subject is an employee of the clinical study site or is otherwise in involved with the conduct of the study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: MEDI3414 [Influenza A (H1N1) vaccine]
MEDI3414- Monovalent vaccine was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing a total volume of 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer, egg allantoic fluid, and approximately 10^7 FFU (fluorescent focus units) of influenza virus type A/California/07/2009.
|
0.5 mL: (intranasal sprayer)
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo - Placebo was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing a total volume of 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer
|
Placebo was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Fever Post Dose 1 (Days 1-8), Defined as an Axillary Temperature ≥ 101°F (38.3°C).
Time Frame: Days 1- 8
|
The number of participants with fever between the two treatment groups was compared based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% exact confidence intervals for the rate difference (Vaccine minus Placebo).
The upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence intervals was evaluated against the prespecified equivalence criterion of 10% which corresponded to the following hypotheses: H0 (null): rate difference ≥ 10%, HA (alternative): rate difference < 10%.
|
Days 1- 8
|
|
Number of Participants Who Experience a Post Dose 1 (Day 15) Seroresponse Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants Regardless of Baseline Serostatus
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 15
|
Seroresponse is described as greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titer from baseline.
All immunogenicity analyses was based on the immunogenicity population.
|
Day 1, Day 15
|
|
Number of Participants Who Experience a Post Dose 1 (Day 29) Seroresponse Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants Regardless of Baseline Serostatus
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 29
|
Seroresponse is described as greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline.
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
|
Day 1, Day 29
|
|
Number of Participants Who Experience a Post Dose 2 (Day 57) Seroresponse Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants Regardless of Baseline Serostatus
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 57
|
Seroresponse is described as greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline.
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
|
Day 1, Day 57
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Symptoms Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time Frame: Days 1-8
|
Other solicited symptoms include fever (> 100°F [37.8°C] axillary), runny/stuffy nose, sore throat, cough, headache, generalized muscle aches, decreased activity level (lethargy) or tiredness/weakness, decreased appetite.
|
Days 1-8
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time Frame: Days 1-8
|
Days 1-8
|
|
|
Number of Participants Using Anti-pyretic and Analgesic Agents Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time Frame: Days 1-8
|
Days 1-8
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Symptoms Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time Frame: Days 1-15
|
Days 1-15
|
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting AEs Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time Frame: Days 1-15
|
Days 1-15
|
|
|
Number of Participants Using Anti-pyretic and Analgesic Agents Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time Frame: Days 1-15
|
Days 1-15
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Symptoms Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time Frame: Days 29-36
|
Days 29-36
|
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting AEs Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time Frame: Days 29-36
|
Days 29-36
|
|
|
Number of Participants Using Anti-pyretic and Analgesic Agents Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time Frame: Days 29-36
|
Days 29-36
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Symptoms Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time Frame: Days 29-43
|
Days 29-43
|
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting AEs Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time Frame: Days 29-43
|
Days 29-43
|
|
|
Number of Participants Using Anti-pyretic and Analgesic Agents Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time Frame: Days 29-43
|
Days 29-43
|
|
|
Number of Participants With New Onset Chronic Diseases (NOCDs) Within 28 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1.
Time Frame: Days 1-29
|
An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition that was of a chronic, ongoing nature and was assessed by the investigator as medically significant.
Examples of NOCDs included, but were not limited to, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disease (eg, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), and neurological disease (eg, epilepsy, autism).
Examples of events not considered NOCDs were mild eczema, diagnosis of a congenital anomaly present at study entry, or acute illness (eg, otitis media, bronchitis).
|
Days 1-29
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 28 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time Frame: Days 1-29
|
SAEs were those AEs that resulted in death; were immediately life threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly in the offspring of a participant; or were an important medical event that may not have resulted in death, threatened life, or required hospitalization and that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
|
Days 1-29
|
|
Number of Participants With NOCDs Within 28 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2.
Time Frame: Days 29-57
|
An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition that was of a chronic, ongoing nature and was assessed by the investigator as medically significant.
Examples of NOCDs included, but were not limited to, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disease (eg, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), and neurological disease (eg, epilepsy, autism).
Examples of events not considered NOCDs were mild eczema, diagnosis of a congenital anomaly present at study entry, or acute illness (eg, otitis media, bronchitis).
|
Days 29-57
|
|
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 28 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time Frame: Days 29-57
|
SAEs were those AEs that resulted in death; were immediately life threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly in the offspring of a participant; or were an important medical event that may not have resulted in death, threatened life, or required hospitalization and that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
|
Days 29-57
|
|
Number of Participants With NOCDs Within 180 Days Post Final Dose of Investigational Product.
Time Frame: Days 1-209
|
An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition that was of a chronic, ongoing nature and was assessed by the investigator as medically significant.
Examples of NOCDs included, but were not limited to, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disease (eg, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), and neurological disease (eg, epilepsy, autism).
Examples of events not considered NOCDs were mild eczema, diagnosis of a congenital anomaly present at study entry, or acute illness (eg, otitis media, bronchitis).
|
Days 1-209
|
|
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 180 Days Post Final Dose of Investigational Product.
Time Frame: Days 1-209
|
SAEs were those AEs that resulted in death; were immediately life threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly in the offspring of a participant; or were an important medical event that may not have resulted in death, threatened life, or required hospitalization and that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
|
Days 1-209
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve a Post Dose 1 (Day 15) HAI Titer Greater Than or Equal to 32 Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus.
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 15
|
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
|
Day 1, Day 15
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve a Post Dose 1 (Day 29) HAI Titer Greater Than or Equal to 32 Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus.
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 29
|
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
|
Day 1, Day 29
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve a Post Dose 2 (Day 57) HAI Titer Greater Than or Equal to 32 Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus.
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 57
|
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
|
Day 1, Day 57
|
|
Serum HAI Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus, Dose 1 (Day 15)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 15
|
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
|
Day 1, Day 15
|
|
Serum HAI GMTs in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus, Dose 1 (Day 29)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 29
|
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
|
Day 1, Day 29
|
|
Serum HAI GMTs in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus, Dose 2 (Day 57)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 57
|
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
|
Day 1, Day 57
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
August 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 23, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
July 24, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
August 11, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 15, 2011
Last Verified
July 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- MI-CP217
- HHS/ASPR (Other Grant/Funding Number: HHSO100200900002I)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Influenza
-
Novartis VaccinesCompletedInfluenza | Seasonal Influenza | Human Influenza | Influenza Due to Unspecified Influenza VirusBelgium
-
Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and...CompletedInfluenza A | Influenza A Virus Infection | Influenza Epidemic | Influenza H5N1Russian Federation
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterHuman Vaccines ProjectCompletedVaccine Reaction | Influenza | Influenza, Human | Influenza A | Influenza Type B | Influenza A H3N2 | Influenza A H1N1United States
-
NPO PetrovaxCompletedVaccine Reaction | Influenza | Influenza, Human | Influenza A | Acute Respiratory Infection | Influenza Type B | Flu | Influenza A H3N2 | Influenza A H1N1 | Flu, Human | Influenza EpidemicRussian Federation
-
Canadian Immunization Research NetworkCHU de Quebec-Universite Laval; McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingAvian Influenza | H5N1 Virus | H5N1 Influenza | Avian Influenza A VirusCanada
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...CompletedInfluenza Immunisation | Avian InfluenzaUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...CompletedInfluenza | Influenza Immunisation | Avian InfluenzaUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...CompletedInfluenza Immunisation | Avian InfluenzaUnited States
Clinical Trials on MEDI3414 [Influenza A(H1N1) live attenuated, intranasal]
-
MedImmune LLCDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCompleted
-
University of RochesterNational Institutes of Health (NIH)Withdrawn2009 H1N1 InfluenzaUnited States
-
University of RochesterCompleted
-
University of RochesterNational Institutes of Health (NIH)Completed
-
WCCT GlobalNational Institutes of Health (NIH); Stanford UniversityCompleted
-
Jiangsu Province Centers for Disease Control and...Completed
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedAcute Respiratory Infection | Influenza-like Illness | Influenza Virus InfectionHong Kong
-
Changchun BCHT Biotechnology Co.He Bei province Center for Disease control and preventionNot yet recruitingInfluenza PreventionChina
-
MedImmune LLCCompleted
-
Changchun BCHT Biotechnology Co.He Bei province Center for Disease control and preventionRecruitingInfluenza PreventionChina