PEARL Program: Empowerment Program for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (HK4) (PEARL)

August 23, 2015 updated by: Juliana Chan, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Peer Support, Empowerment and Remote Communication Linked by Information Technology (PEARL): A Multi-Component Program to Improve Community-Based Diabetes Care

Quality diabetes care requires informed-decisions of motivated care providers and diabetes patients. The investigators aim to use peer support and information technology to facilitate care providers to implement structured care and empower diabetes patients acquire self-management skills in a multi-component program.

The investigators will make use of the following tools: (1) The Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) Program. JADE Program uses a web-based electronic portal to establish a registry and stratify diabetes patients to care protocols based on their risk profiles with features of decision support and data management. (2) The Australasian Telephone Linked Care (TLC) system. TLC system utilizes an automatic, interactive, computer-controlled telephone system to monitor and promote diabetes self-management.

Amongst 600 diabetes patients receiving structured care in Hong Kong through the JADE Program, half of them will be randomized to receive peer support (n=300) including personal coaching by 30 trained mentors (1 mentor to 10 diabetes patients or mentees) through regular phone calls and sharing sessions, and the other half (n=300) will continue the usual diabetes care in their clinic. The 30 mentors are themselves diabetes patients who have good self care and are motivated to support their peers. The mentors will be trained to deliver peer support intervention under supervision by a program manager. The 300 diabetes patients (mentees) randomized to the peer support group are the intervention targets of these 30 mentors. They will be reminded to use the TLC for knowledge enhancement and motivational support.

The investigators will analyse the changes in risk factor control (blood glucose parameters, blood pressure, body weight, lipids), quality of life and cognitive-psychological-behavioral parameters after 12 months. Effects of various components of peer support on these outcomes as well as user acceptability and cost-effectiveness of these programs will be examined.

The investigators will test the hypothesis that in a multi-component program, the use of a peer support program delivered by diabetes patient-mentors, to influence and motivate other diabetes patients receiving structured care made possible through a web-based disease management program, delivered by a doctor-nurse team, will further improve metabolic control, QOL and self care compared to diabetes patients receiving the same standard of care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this global epidemic of diabetes and obesity, more than 60% of affected people will come from Asia with the most rapid increase in the young to middle aged group. This rapid increase in young onset diabetes will have major implications on health care costs, quality of life and societal productivity. Despite the amassing body of evidence supporting the highly preventable nature of diabetes and associated complications, there are multiple barriers in the implementation of quality diabetes care. Apart from issues relating to health care systems and reimbursement, the silent nature of diabetes and associated complications as well as the complex nature of care protocols which requires frequent evaluation of clinical and laboratory parameters and the need for diabetes patients to adhere to long term medications and self care are important factors.

Diabetes is a prototype of chronic diseases covering the full spectrum of health promotion, disease prevention, management and rehabilitation. To achieve these inter-dependent goals, multiple levels of expertise and support are needed to preserve health, prevent complications and enhance quality of life. A successful diabetes care program depends on informed decisions of motivated care providers and diabetes patients who require periodic comprehensive assessments for risk stratification and individualized management which include education, assessments, feedback and technologies.

According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) global guidelines (www.idf.org), standard diabetes care include the delivery of culturally sensitive care, cultivation of relationship between care providers and diabetes patients, offer of annual surveillance, goal setting on care plans and targets, adherence to protocol, provision of access to patient-centred care using a multidisciplinary team, establishment of a registry for recall, provision of telephone contact and patient support group and a quality assurance and improvement program. Comprehensive care includes all components of standard of care together with access of diabetes patients to their own data and decision support.

To achieve this ambitious goal, delivery of chronic care must be integrated with effective self management on a long term basis. People with diabetes need to acquire knowledge, skills and attitudes to exercise self discipline on food choices, physical activity, self monitoring and management of negative emotions. To this end, experts have identified 6 key resources and support for self management including 1) individualized assessment, 2) collaborative goal setting, 3) skills enhancement, 4) follow-up and support, 5) access to resources, and 6) continuity of quality clinical care.

However, most studies which use cognitive and psychological strategies to effect behavioral changes have reported high rates of relapse despite initial success, often due to negative external or social influences. Thus, to enhance self management, there is a need to take into consideration both internal needs (assessment of individual needs, learning skills and goal setting) and external support (e.g. families, organizations, neighborhoods, and communities) to encourage and reinforce the use of learned skills to sustain positive behavior and self management on a long term basis. Adding to these emerging concepts in behavioral medicine is equifinality, i.e. diverse approaches may achieve similar end. Thus, a multi-component program offering a broad range of intervention approaches may tailor the pluralistic needs of people with diabetes or chronic disease.

Aims of the Study:

  1. To quantify the impacts of peer support on self management skills, quality of life (QOL) and cognitive-psychological-behavioral parameter.
  2. To quantify effects of various components of self management skills and cognitive- psychological-behavioral parameters on metabolic control, care processes and QOL.
  3. To examine the user acceptability (including health care team and diabetes patients) and cost effectiveness of this multi-component system in improving diabetes care in the community..

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

632

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Hong Kong, China
        • Asia Diabetes Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Type 2 diabetic patients with medium or moderate risk for complications (stratified by JADE Program, Care Levels 2 to 4) and followed up 3-4 monthly according to the JADE Program. Based on our 6000-patient registry, these risk levels clearly separate diabetes patients based on risk of future clinical events.
  • 2) Men/women aged 18-70 years (inclusive), functionally independent and with informed written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Patients with one or no risk factors (low risk, Care Level 1 by JADE Program) as stratified by the JADE Risk Engine.

    2) Patients with reduced life expectancy and unstable mood or major psychiatric conditions.

    3) Patients who cannot communicate in Chinese language.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual care
The 'control arm' will receive standard usual care with clinicians' follow-up and referral with education to diabetes nurses if deemed necessary at in-charge clinicians' discretion.
Behavioral: Usual Care
Subjects in Usual CAre will receive standard care with clinicians' usual follow-up and referral with education to diabetes nurses if deemed necessary at in-charge clinicians' discretion.
Active Comparator: Patient Peer Support and Empowerment
30 mentors are themselves diabetes patients who have good self care and are motivated to support their peers. The mentors will be trained to deliver peer support intervention under supervision by a program manager. The 300 diabetes patients (mentees) randomized to the peer support group are the intervention targets of these 30 mentors. Telephone-Linked-Communication (TLC) system will be a tool of the mentors for education to the mentees. TLC system utilizes an automatic, interactive, computer-controlled telephone system to monitor and promote diabetes self-management.
Behavioral: Patient Peer Support and Empowerment
30 mentors are themselves diabetes patients who have good self care and are motivated to support their peers. The mentors will be trained to deliver peer support intervention under supervision by a program manager. The 300 diabetes patients (mentees) randomized to the peer support group are the intervention targets of these 30 mentors. Telephone-Linked-Communication (TLC) system will be a tool of the mentors for education to the mentees. TLC system utilizes an automatic, interactive, computer-controlled telephone system to monitor and promote diabetes self-management.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Blood pressure
Time Frame: one year
one year
Body weight
Time Frame: one year
one year
Glycemic control
Time Frame: one year
one year
Lipid levels
Time Frame: one year
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cognitive-psychological-behavioral assessments: a) Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS21). b) Diabetes Empowerment Scale (C-DES). c) Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities (SDSCA, Chinese version).
Time Frame: One year
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Collaborators

Asia Diabetes Foundation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 3, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRE-2009-079

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Usual Care

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Estonia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe