MiDAS I (Mild® Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): Vertos Mild Patient Evaluation Study (MiDAS I)

February 21, 2013 updated by: Vertos Medical, Inc.
This is a multi-center, prospective, clinical study to assess the clinical application and outcomes of MILD® Interlaminar Decompression in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States, 72401
        • NEA Clinic
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA
      • Napa, California, United States, 94558
        • Napa Pain Institute
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92037
        • UCSD
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92037
        • Scripps, Division of Orthopedic Surgery
      • Temecula, California, United States, 92591
        • Your Pain Care
    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209
        • Coastal Orthopedics & Sports Medicine
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33140
        • South Florida Spine Institute
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21211
        • The Spine Center
    • Nevada
      • Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89074
        • Rainer Vogel, MD LTD
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89149
        • Lab2Marche, LLC
    • Ohio
      • Mansfield, Ohio, United States, 44903
        • MedCentral Health System
    • Pennsylvania
      • Easton, Pennsylvania, United States, 18045
        • Orthopedic Associates of the Greater Lehigh Valley

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) primarily caused by dorsal element hypertrophy.
  • Prior failure of conservative therapy.
  • Radiologic evidence of LSS (L3-L5), Ligamentum flavum > 2.5mm, confirmed by pre-op MRI and/or CT.
  • Central canal cross sectional area ≤ 100 square mm.
  • Anterior listhesis ≤ 5.0mm.
  • Able to walk at least 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain.
  • Available to complete 12 weeks of follow-up.
  • Consistent with the intended labeling statement for use.
  • Able to use all package components to perform the procedure.
  • A signed Informed Consent Form is obtained from the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior surgery at intended treatment level.
  • History of recent spinal fractures with concurrent pain symptoms.
  • Disabling back or leg pain from causes other than LSS (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
  • Significant / symptomatic disk protrusion or osteophyte formation.
  • Excessive / symptomatic facet hypertrophy.
  • Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti-coagulants.
  • Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) within 5 days of treatment.
  • Epidural steroids within prior three weeks.
  • Inability of the patient to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, etc.).
  • Any potential wound healing pathologies that may compromise outcomes, including diabetes, excessive smoking history, cancer, connective tissue diseases, recent spine radiation and severe COPD.
  • Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Intended treatment that is defined by the product labeling contraindications.
  • On Workman's Compensation or considering litigation associated with back pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: interlaminar decompression
Commercially available product (mild® Device Kit) used to perform interlaminar decompression
The MILD® devices used in this study are specialized surgical instruments intended to be used to perform percutaneous lumbar decompression.
Other Names:
  • mild® Device Kit
  • percutaneous decompression

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Back Pain as Measured by a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: Baseline and Six Months
The 10-point Visual Analog Scale rates 'no pain' as zero and 'worst pain imaginable' as ten. Visual analog scores of mean improvement greater than or equal to 2.0 are clinically relevant. The change from baseline to six months is reported below, where a positive value represents the baseline value minus the 6 month value.
Baseline and Six Months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Function Measure Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Measures Permanent Functional Disability Through Questions Which Characterize Disturbance of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Resulting From Chronic Back Pain. Higher Scores Indicate Greater Disability.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months
Change from baseline to month six is reported below, where a positive value represents baseline value minus 6 month value. The questionnaire is divided into 10 topics including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling and employment/homemaking. Each topic is rated 0 (no pain or no limitation)to 5 (high pain or very limited physically) based on typical pain and/or physical limitations. The worst possible score is 50 (100 % disability) and best would be zero (0% disability).
Baseline and Six months
Quality of Life Physical Component Score (PCS) as Measured by the 12-question Short Form Survey Version 2 (SF-12v2). Change From Baseline Mean to Six Month Mean is Reported Below. A Positive Value Represents the 6 Month Value Minus the Baseline Value.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six Months
Minimally Important Difference (MID) is a measure of true clinical relevance of a difference. The MID for mean Physical Component Score (PCS) improvement is 2 to 3 points. SF-12v2 is a validated tool that uses norm-based scoring to determine treatment outcomes & is a generic measure, as opposed to one that targets a specific age, disease, or treatment group. The SF-12v2 asks for patient views about their health to determine how they feel & how well they are able to conduct their usual activities. The data for the 2 summary scales and 8 survey scales are normalized so each scale has the same mean (50 points) & the same standard deviation (10 points) in the general 1998 U.S. population. By using this method, anytime a scale is below 50, health status is below average, & each point is one-tenth of a standard deviation. The PCS summary measure takes into account the correlations among the Health Survey scales, & shows the broad impact which was of interest in this study.
Baseline and Six Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bohdan W Chopko, MD, MedCentral Health System
  • Principal Investigator: David Caraway, MD, The Center for Pain Relief Tri-State, PLLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Interlaminar Decompression

3
Subscribe