- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02555280
Coflex PS3 Actual Conditions for Use Study (PAS003)
June 30, 2026 updated by: Companion Spine, LLC
A 2 and 5 Year Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Degenerative Spinal Stenosis With Concomitant Low Back Pain by Decompression With Additional Stabilization Using the Coflex® Interlaminar Technology for FDA Actual Conditions for Use Study.
A 2 and 5 year evaluation of clinical outcomes in the treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis with concomitant low back pain by decompression with additional stabilization using the coflex® Interlaminar Technology for FDA Actual Conditions of Use Study.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A prospective, multi center, concurrently enrolled, propensity score controlled through Month 60.
The purpose is to fully characterize safety and efficacy then the coflex device is used in the intended subject population under actual conditions of use.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
40
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85020
- Desert Institute for Spine Care (DISC)
-
-
California
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
- Sutter Health
-
San Luis Obispo, California, United States, 93401
- Central Cost Neurological Surgery
-
Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
- Cervical Disc Center of Los Angeles
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- UC Health Spine Center
-
-
Florida
-
Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308
- Tallahassee Neurological Clinic
-
-
Illinois
-
Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
- 01L_Northshore University Health System
-
-
Indiana
-
Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47905
- 24_Unity Surgical Center, LLC
-
-
Louisiana
-
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71101
- Spine Institute of Louisiana
-
-
New York
-
Great Neck, New York, United States, 11021
- Northwell Health Physician Partners Orthopaedic Institute at Great Neck
-
-
Oregon
-
Medford, Oregon, United States, 97504
- Southern Oregon Orthpaedics
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97225
- Summit Spine
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- 03L_Thomas Jefferson University
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78746
- Austin Neurosurgeons
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Radiographic confirmation of at least moderate lumbar stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L1-L5 that require surgical decompression.
- Visual Analog Scale back pain score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm scale.
- Neurogenic claudication as defined by leg/buttocks or groin pain that can be relieved by flexion such as sitting in a chair.
- Subject has undergone at least one lumbar injection at any prior time point, AND/OR at least 6 months of prior conservative care without adequate and sustained symptom relief.
- Skeletally mature
- Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score of at least 20/50 (40%).
- Psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to fully comply with this protocol, including adhering to scheduled visits, treatment plan, completing forms, and other study procedures.
- Personally signed and dated informed consent document prior to any study-related procedures indicating that the patient has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior fusion or decompressive laminectomy at index lumbar level.
- Radiographically compromised vertebral bodies at any lumbar level(s) caused by current or past trauma or tumor (e.g., compression fracture).
- Severe facet hypertrophy that requires extensive bone removal which would cause instability.
- Isthmic spondylolisthesis or spondylolysis (pars fracture).
- Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (Cobb angle of greater than 25°).
- Osteoporsis or is at increased risk of osteoporosis.
- Back or leg pain of unknown etiology.
- Axial back pain only, with no leg, buttock, or groin pain.
- Morbid obesity defined as a body mass index > 40.
- Known allergy to titanium, titanium alloys, or MR contrast agents.
- Active or chronic infection - systemic or local.
- Cauda equina syndrome, defined as neural compression causing neurogenic bowel (rectal incontinence) or bladder (bladder retention or incontinence) dysfunction.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: The coflex® Interlaminar Technology
The coflex device was designed to address the clinical needs of spinal stenosis patients by providing stabilization of the affected level without fusion.
The coflex is an interspinous process functional dynamic implant designed to impart a stabilizing effect at the treated level(s).
The coflex device was approved by FDA in 2012.
|
Decompression plus coflex® Interlaminar Technology
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Decompression
Lumbar decompression back surgery is when a small portion of the bone over the nerve root and/or disc material from under the nerve root is removed to give the nerve root more space and provide a better healing environment.
|
Decompression alone
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
coflex performance compared to IDE
Time Frame: 24and 60 Months
|
Evaluation of coflex device performance in conjunction with surgical decompression in an actual conditions of use study.
|
24and 60 Months
|
|
coflex performance compared to decompression alone from ESCADA study.
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
To compare clinical status of patients implanted with the coflex device in conjunction with surgical decompression relative to surgical decompression alone from ESCADA study.
|
24 Months
|
|
Composite Clinical Success (CCS)
Time Frame: 24 Month
|
|
24 Month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 and 60 months
|
Quality of life as determined by ODI.
In terms of achieving at least a 15 point improvement.
|
Baseline, 24 and 60 months
|
|
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 and 60 Months
|
Low back pain reduction evaluated by use of VAS for back pain.
In terms of achieving at least a 20 point improvement.
|
Baseline, 24 and 60 Months
|
|
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 and 60 Months
|
Leg pain reduction evaluated by use of VAS for leg pain.
In terms of achieving at least a 20 point improvement.
|
Baseline, 24 and 60 Months
|
|
Neurological Status
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 Months
|
Assessment of maintenance of improvement after surgery.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 Months
|
|
Radiographic Assessments
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 12, 24, 60 Months
|
|
6 weeks, 12, 24, 60 Months
|
|
Modified CCS
Time Frame: 24 Month
|
CCS will be modified to include no use of a narcotic (opioids or opiates).
|
24 Month
|
|
Medication Usage
Time Frame: 24 Month
|
No use of narcotic (opioids and/or opiates)
|
24 Month
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety Evaluation
Time Frame: Procedure, 6 week, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 Months
|
Safety will be evaluated by assessing the incidence of device and/or procedure related adverse events, revision, additional stabilizations
|
Procedure, 6 week, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 9, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2026
Study Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 18, 2015
First Posted (Estimated)
September 21, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 2, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 30, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PS3/P110008
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Stenosis Lumbar
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridHospital San Carlos, Madrid; FUNDACION PARA LA INVESTIGACION HOSPITAL CLINICO...RecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) | Lumbar Canal StenosisSpain
-
4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic,...Medtronics, Inc.Not yet recruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Spinal Instability | Degenerative Lumbar Spine DiseasesPoland
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisItaly
-
University of ValenciaHospital General Universitario de ValenciaCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Neurogenic ClaudicationSpain
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNorth American Spine SocietyCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spinal InstabilityUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityWithdrawnLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Disc Disease | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityTurkey
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandKlinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, University Hospital BaselCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal StenosisSwitzerland
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingRecruitingLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar SpondylosisChina
-
Bursa City HospitalCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityTurkey
-
The First People's Hospital of LianyungangNot yet recruitingSpinal Stenosis Lumbar
Clinical Trials on coflex® Interlaminar Technology
-
Paradigm SpineMCRACompleted
-
Paradigm SpineMCRACompleted
-
Vertos Medical, Inc.CompletedLumbar Spinal StenosisUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkZimmer BiometActive, not recruiting
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...CompletedOsteoarthritis, Knee | Osteoarthritis, Hip | Balance; Distorted | Gait Disorders in Old AgeItaly
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...CompletedStroke | Gait Disorders, Neurologic | BalanceItaly
-
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSuspendedUtilising Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) Technology to Monitor Tacrolimus and CreatinineKidney Transplant Rejection | Kidney ReplacementUnited Kingdom
-
Hospices Civils de LyonTerminatedLow Grade Glioma (LGG), High Grade Glioma (HGG)France
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.Completed
-
Stryker South PacificCompletedKnee Replacement | Arthroplasties