Telephone Support to Improve Adherence to Anti-HIV Medications

April 17, 2017 updated by: AIDS Clinical Trials Group

A Randomized Trial of Enhanced Nursing Telephone Support to Improve Medication Self-Management and Viral Outcomes of Antiretroviral Therapy-Experienced Patients

This study tested a system of nursing telephone support to determine if it improves adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in at-risk, treatment-experienced people.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is only successful in treating HIV when people take all the medications prescribed to them when and how they are instructed. However, a third or more of patients on ART are not able to adhere to their medication regimens. Therefore, making sure that these patients stay healthy involves making sure they are motivated and informed about the importance of adhering to their ART. Nurses can deliver interventions to motivate and inform patients through regularly scheduled phone calls. These calls allow nurses to check in between clinic visits, are convenient to patients, and are cost efficient. This study tested an enhanced telephone support intervention provided by nurses that aimed to improve ART adherence and treatment outcomes.

Follow-up for this study lasted 72 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either care as usual or the enhanced telephone support intervention plus care as usual. The telephone support intervention involved phone calls made weekly for the first 8 weeks of the study and then every 2 weeks for the next 40 weeks. Nurses made these calls at a time and place participants chose. During the calls, nurses provided information, motivational enhancement, and problem-solving skills.

Study assessments took place at study entry and after 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks. Assessments measured CD4 cell count, HIV viral load, adherence, and illness events. Adherence was measured through questionnaires and an electronic pill cap.

This study was closed early to both accrual and follow-up due to low recruitment. The study aimed to enroll 296 participants. The actual study accrual at the time of early closing was 59 participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Alabama Therapeutics CRS
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • Ucsd, Avrc Crs
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University CRS (2701)
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center ACTG
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital ACTG CRS
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Bmc Actg Crs (104)
    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper Univ. Hosp. CRS (31476)
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103
        • New Jersey Medical School-Adult Clinical Research Ctr. CRS
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10011
        • Cornell CRS
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • HIV Prevention & Treatment CRS
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • Unc Aids Crs
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center Adult CRS
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
        • MetroHealth CRS
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania CRS
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt Therapeutics CRS
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75208
        • 31443 Trinity Health and Wellness Center CRS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrollment in an AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) treatment study that is an approved A5251 parent or coenrolling partner study ("ACTG parent study participant") or not enrolled in one of the ACTG parent studies, but receiving routine HIV patient care at an institution that was also an ACTG-funded site ("ACTG clinic patient participant").
  • Virologic failure on combination antiretroviral therapy (ART), with an HIV-1 genotype conducted on or soon after the failure, within 16 weeks prior to entry. Availability of HIV-1 genotype results at entry.
  • History of prior nonadherence to ART during the past year documented either by patient self-report or recorded in the patient's medical record
  • Most recent HIV-1 RNA value of at least 200 copies/mL, obtained within 90 days prior to study entry and measured using any FDA-approved test for quantifying HIV-1 RNA
  • Initiating or restarting an ART regimen with 2 or more active ARV medications within 3 days after randomization. The regimen must have been selected for the participant prior to the time of randomization for A5251. An active ARV medication was defined as a medication to which the participant was expected to be susceptible based on HIV-1 resistance testing, as specified in the ACTG parent study, or determined by the participant's health care provider per standard of care.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No regular access to a phone. Candidates without phones may have elected to participate by calling the HIV nurse specialists using an 800 number, rather than being called by the HIV nurse specialist.
  • Coenrollment in another adherence trial, unless approved by the A5251 study chair
  • Current incarceration
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would have compromised the candidate's ability to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enhanced nursing telephone support with standard care
Participants received enhanced nursing telephone support plus care as usual.
Weekly phone calls by study nurses for 8 weeks and then calls every 2 weeks for 40 weeks; nurses could schedule more frequent calls at their discretion. Calls provided information, motivational enhancement, problem-solving skills, and affective support.
Usual ACTG site care.
Active Comparator: Standard care
Participants received care as usual.
Usual ACTG site care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Virologic Suppression
Time Frame: Week 48
Number of participants with virologic suppression, defined as HIV-1 RNA at less than 200 copies/mL at week 48.
Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Premature Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Regimen Discontinuation
Time Frame: From study entry to Week 72
Number of premature ART regimen discontinuations, defined as the first substitution, subtraction, or addition of one or more ARVs made to the initial study regimen.
From study entry to Week 72
Change in CD4 Cell Count at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change in CD4 cell count from baseline at week 12, calculated as Week 12 CD4 minus baseline CD4.
Baseline and Week 12
Change in CD4 Cell Count at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change in CD4 cell count from baseline at Week 24, calculated as Week 24 CD4 minus baseline CD4.
Baseline and Week 24
Change in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 48
Change in CD4 cell count from baseline at Week 48, calculated as Week 48 CD4 minus baseline CD4.
Baseline and Week 48
Confirmed Virologic Failure
Time Frame: Week 24 through Week 72
Number of participants with confirmed virologic failure. Virologic failure is defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL at or after the week 24 HIV-1 RNA evaluation (obtained at least 20 weeks after the date of randomization).
Week 24 through Week 72
Cost of the Adherence Telephone Interventions
Time Frame: Week 48
This outcome was planned to be analyzed if the intervention was found to be successful. However, the intervention was not determined to be successful.
Week 48
Number of Participants With Illness Events or Mortality
Time Frame: Measured from entry to Week 72 or premature study discontinuation
Number of participants who had acute illnesses and mortality during follow-up. The categories of illness events and mortality are not mutually exclusive.
Measured from entry to Week 72 or premature study discontinuation
Number of Participants With Virological Suppression
Time Frame: Measured from entry to Week 72 or premature study discontinuation
Number of participants with virological suppression, defined as HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL.
Measured from entry to Week 72 or premature study discontinuation
Number of Participants Who Received Last Telephone Call if Prior to the End of Defined Intervention Period
Time Frame: Measured from entry to Week 72 or premature study discontinuation
Number of participants whose last telephone call received occurred prior to the end of the defined intervention period.
Measured from entry to Week 72 or premature study discontinuation
Intervention Dosage Score for Enhanced Nursing Telephone Support (Total Percentage of Scheduled Calls Successfully Delivered)
Time Frame: Measured at Week 12
Intervention dosage score for enhanced nursing telephone support. This is the total percentage of scheduled calls successfully delivered.
Measured at Week 12
Intervention Dosage Score for Enhanced Nursing Telephone Support (Total Amount of Time Spent in Calls)
Time Frame: Week 12
Intervention dosage score for enhanced nursing telephone support. This is the total amount of time spent in calls overall.
Week 12
Number of Participants With Virologic Suppression, Defined as HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Number of participants with virologic suppression, defined as HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL, at week 12.
Week 12
Number of Participants With Virologic Suppression, Defined as HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Week 24.
Time Frame: Week 24
Number of participants with virologic suppression, defined as HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL, at week 24.
Week 24
Number of Participants With Virologic Suppression, Defined as HIV-1 RNA Less Than 1,000 Copies/mL at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Number of participants with virologic suppression, defined as HIV-1 RNA less than 1,000 copies/mL, at week 12.
Week 12
Number of Participants With Virologic Suppression, Defined as HIV-1 RNA Less Than 1,000 Copies/mL at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Number of participants with virologic suppression, defined as HIV-1 RNA less than 1,000 copies/mL, at week 24.
Week 24
Number of Participants With Virologic Suppression, Defined as HIV-1 RNA Less Than 1,000 Copies/mL at Week 48
Time Frame: Measured at Week 48
Number of participants with virologic suppression, defined as HIV-1 RNA less than 1,000 copies/mL, at week 48.
Measured at Week 48
Antiretroviral (ARV) Medication Adherence at Week 12 Using ACTG Adherence Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 12
ARV medication adherence at week 12, as measured by the ACTG adherence questionnaire index. This questionnaire index is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating higher adherence.
Week 12
Antiretroviral (ARV) Medication Adherence at Week 24 Using ACTG Adherence Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 24
ARV medication adherence at week 24, as measured by the ACTG adherence questionnaire index. The ACTG adherence questionnaire index is on a 0-100 scale where higher scores indicate better adherence.
Week 24
Antiretroviral (ARV) Medication Adherence at Week 12 Using Four Day Recall
Time Frame: Week 12
ARV medication adherence at week 12, as measured by four day recall, i.e. "Missed doses in last 4 days".
Week 12
Antiretroviral (ARV) Medication Adherence at Week 24 Using Four Day Recall
Time Frame: Week 24
ARV medication adherence, as measured by four day recall, i.e. "Missed doses in last 4 days".
Week 24
Antiretroviral (ARV) Medication Adherence at Week 12 Using Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Week 12
ARV medication adherence at week 12, as measured by the visual analog scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-100% scale that measures the percentage of HIV medication taken in the past month.
Week 12
Antiretroviral (ARV) Medication Adherence at Week 24 Using Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Week 24
ARV medication adherence at Week 24, as measured by the visual analog scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-100% scale that measures the percentage of HIV medication taken in the past month.
Week 24
Quality of Life Measured by Euro-QoL - Mobility
Time Frame: Week 24
Quality of life measured by Euro-QoL - Question 1: Mobility.
Week 24
Quality of Life Measured by Euro-QoL - Self-Care
Time Frame: Week 24
Quality of Life Measured by Euro-QoL - Question 2: Self-Care.
Week 24
Quality of Life Measured by Euro-QoL - Usual Activities
Time Frame: Week 24
Quality of Life Measured by Euro-QoL - Question 3: Usual activities.
Week 24
Quality of Life Measured by Euro-QoL - Pain/Discomfort
Time Frame: Week 24
Quality of Life Measured by Euro-QoL - Question 4: Pain/Discomfort.
Week 24
Quality of Life Measured by Euro-QoL - Anxiety/Depression
Time Frame: Week 24
Quality of Life Measured by Euro-QoL - Question 5: Anxiety/Depression.
Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nancy R. Reynolds, PhD, RN, NP, Yale University School of Nursing

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Enhanced nursing telephone support

Subscribe