Cosmetic Outcome of Electrocautery, Scalpel and PEAK PlasmaBlade for Surgical Breast Incisions (SCPPB)

March 19, 2024 updated by: Carol Dingee, University of British Columbia

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Cosmetic Outcome of Electrocautery, Scalpel and PEAK PlasmaBlade for Surgical Breast Incisions

This study will compare the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, electrocautery, and pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade (PPB) for the initial skin incision for total mastectomy procedures without immediate breast reconstruction.

It is hypothesized that there will be no significant difference in mastectomy scar cosmesis.

The purpose and objectives of this study are:

  1. To evaluate and compare the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, standard electrocautery, or PEAK PlasmaBlade for initial incision for total mastectomy procedures without immediate breast reconstruction.
  2. To inform future equipment choices for breast surgery including potential elimination of scalpels and their attendant risks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Scalpel, electrocautery, and PEAK PlasmaBlade (PPB) have all been shown to be safe techniques for surgical incision, but no study has proven the superiority for cosmesis for PPB incision when compared to conventional electrocautery or scalpel.

The investigators propose a double blind prospective randomized controlled study of consecutive patients scheduled for total mastectomy +/- axilla staging without immediate breast reconstruction to evaluate the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, standard electrocautery or PEAK PlasmaBlade.

Scar cosmesis will be evaluated postoperatively at two-to-four weeks, six months, and twelve months by two independent observers blinded to the equipment used, and patient reported outcomes will be reported using the validated SCAR-Q questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 3N4
        • Mount Saint Joseph Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carol K Dingee, MC, FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Amy K Bazzarelli, MD, FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Melina Deban, MD, FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Elaine C McKevitt, MD, FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jieun Newman-Bremang, MD, FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jin-Si Pao, MD, FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rebecca Warburton, MD, FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kathryn Isaac, MD, FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lisa Aird, MD, FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yuwei Yang, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Bennett B Westmore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having a total mastectomy with or without axilla surgical staging

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having immediate breast reconstruction
  • Patients with a diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer
  • History of keloid scar formation
  • History of connective tissue disorder (scleroderma or rheumatoid arthritis with skin involvement)
  • Patients with prior incision at the planned mastectomy site.
  • Patients with known suture hypersensitivity
  • Patients with evidence of current infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
The Standard of Care arm will consist of the scalpel for the initial skin incision and further randomization to have completion of the surgery with standard electrocautery or PEAK PlasmaBlade.
Scalpel followed by completion of surgery with standard electrocautery or PEAK PlasmaBlade.
Experimental: PEAK PlasmaBlade
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the surgery, including the initial skin incision.
PEAK PlasmaBlade for entire surgery.
Experimental: Standard Electrocautery
Standard electrocautery will be used for the entirety of the surgery, including the initial skin incision.
Standard Electrocautery for entire surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scar cosmesis (SCAR scale)
Time Frame: 2-4 weeks post-operatively
Mastectomy site scar cosmesis will be evaluated 2-4 weeks post-operatively by two independent observers blinded to the equipment used for the surgery using photo evaluation with the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale. The SCAR scale yields scores ranging from a minimum score of 0 (best possible scar) to a maximum score of 15 (worst possible scar).
2-4 weeks post-operatively
Scar cosmesis (Vancouver Scar Scale)
Time Frame: 2-4 weeks post-operatively
Mastectomy site scar cosmesis will be evaluated 2-4 weeks post-operatively by the treating surgeon using the Vancouver Scar Scale for physical examination. The Vancouver Scar Scale yields scores ranging from 0 (best) to 13 (worst).
2-4 weeks post-operatively
Scar cosmesis (SCAR-Q)
Time Frame: 2-4 weeks post-operatively
Patient reported outcomes will be reported 2-4 weeks post-operatively using the SCAR-Q scale, a comprehensive scar appearance scale with independently functioning domains for scar appearance, scar symptoms and psychosocial impact, which each yield transformed scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
2-4 weeks post-operatively
Scar cosmesis (SCAR scale)
Time Frame: 6 months post-operatively
Mastectomy site scar cosmesis will be evaluated 6 months post-operatively by two independent observers blinded to the equipment used for the surgery using photo evaluation with the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale. The SCAR scale yields scores ranging from a minimum score of 0 (best possible scar) to a maximum score of 15 (worst possible scar).
6 months post-operatively
Scar cosmesis (Vancouver Scar Scale)
Time Frame: 6 months post-operatively
Mastectomy site scar cosmesis will be evaluated 6 months post-operatively by the treating surgeon using the Vancouver Scar Scale for physical examination. The Vancouver Scar Scale yields scores ranging from 0 (best) to 13 (worst).
6 months post-operatively
Scar cosmesis (SCAR-Q)
Time Frame: 6 months post-operatively
Patient reported outcomes will be reported 6 months post-operatively using the SCAR-Q scale, a comprehensive scar appearance scale with independently functioning domains for scar appearance, scar symptoms and psychosocial impact, which each yield transformed scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
6 months post-operatively
Scar cosmesis (SCAR scale)
Time Frame: 12 months post-operatively
Mastectomy site scar cosmesis will be evaluated 12 months post-operatively by two independent observers blinded to the equipment used for the surgery using photo evaluation with the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale. The SCAR scale yields scores ranging from a minimum score of 0 (best possible scar) to a maximum score of 15 (worst possible scar).
12 months post-operatively
Scar cosmesis (Vancouver Scar Scale)
Time Frame: 12 months post-operatively
Mastectomy site scar cosmesis will be evaluated 12 months post-operatively by the treating surgeon using the Vancouver Scar Scale for physical examination. The Vancouver Scar Scale yields scores ranging from 0 (best) to 13 (worst).
12 months post-operatively
Scar cosmesis (SCAR-Q)
Time Frame: 12 months post-operatively
Patient reported outcomes will be reported 12 months post-operatively using the SCAR-Q scale, a comprehensive scar appearance scale with independently functioning domains for scar appearance, scar symptoms and psychosocial impact, which each yield transformed scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
12 months post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of post-operative seroma
Time Frame: within 12 months post-operatively
Development of post-operative seroma, graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system for surgical complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications ranges from Grade I (any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions) to Grade V (death of a patient).
within 12 months post-operatively
Development of post-operative hematoma
Time Frame: within 12 months post-operatively
Development of post-operative hematoma, graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system for surgical complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications ranges from Grade I (any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions) to Grade V (death of a patient).
within 12 months post-operatively
Development of excessive bruising
Time Frame: within 12 months post-operatively
Development of post-operative excessive bruising, graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system for surgical complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications ranges from Grade I (any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions) to Grade V (death of a patient).
within 12 months post-operatively
Development of flap necrosis
Time Frame: within 12 months post-operatively
Development of post-operative flap-necrosis, graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system for surgical complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications ranges from Grade I (any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions) to Grade V (death of a patient).
within 12 months post-operatively
Development of wound dehiscence
Time Frame: within 12 months post-operatively
Development of post-operative wound dehiscence, graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system for surgical complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications ranges from Grade I (any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions) to Grade V (death of a patient).
within 12 months post-operatively
Development of cellulitis
Time Frame: within 12 months post-operatively
Development of post-operative cellulitis, graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system for surgical complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications ranges from Grade I (any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions) to Grade V (death of a patient).
within 12 months post-operatively
Delayed healing
Time Frame: within 12 months post-operatively
Delayed healing post-operatively, graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system for surgical complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications ranges from Grade I (any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions) to Grade V (death of a patient).
within 12 months post-operatively
Wound infection rate
Time Frame: within 12 months post-operatively
Development of wound infection post-operatively.
within 12 months post-operatively
Length of operative procedure
Time Frame: beginning to end of operative procedure
The duration of the operative procedure.
beginning to end of operative procedure
Intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame: beginning to end of operative procedure
Volume of blood loss during the operative procedure.
beginning to end of operative procedure
Peri-operative pain
Time Frame: from end of operative procedure to 2 weeks post-operatively
Peri-operative pain will be indicated by the medication prescribed and/or taken during post-anesthesia recovery (PAR) and surgical daycare.
from end of operative procedure to 2 weeks post-operatively
Duration of drain
Time Frame: from drain placement to drain removal, up to 1 month
The total time between drain placement and removal. Drain removal will occur when less than 30 mL of drainage accumulates for two consecutive days.
from drain placement to drain removal, up to 1 month
Volume of measured drainage
Time Frame: from drain placement to drain removal, up to 1 month
Volume of drainage measured throughout drain duration. Drain removal will occur when less than 30 mL of drainage accumulates for two consecutive days.
from drain placement to drain removal, up to 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carol K Dingee, MD, FRCSC, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on Scalpel and standard electrocautery or PEAK PlasmaBlade

3
Subscribe