- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01027442
The Use of Bone-, Tooth- and Mucosa- Supported Stereolithographic Guides for Dental Implant Placement (stereolitho)
Conventional Versus Computer Aided Implantology
Introduction:
The use stereolithographic (SLA) guides may provide significant benefits in simultaneous placement of multiple implants, especially in large edentulous areas lacking anatomic landmarks for surgical reference. Planning of the implant positions prior to surgery may shorten the duration of the surgery spent by exploring and determining the suitable implant location on the edentulous alveolar crest in the standard technique . Previous studies have demonstrated the use of many SLA guide in this manner, however; most were designed to be used as placed on the alveolar crest (bone-supported) following a flap exposure, and there was no depth-control of the osteotomy drills. Further advances in stereolithography allowed flapless surgeries to be performed via mucosa-supported guides (Rosenfeld, et al. 2006c, Tardieu, et al. 2007). The use of these guides eliminates not only the time required for incision and flap exposure but post-operative patient morbidity and discomfort may also be reduced, due to the non-invasive nature of the procedure. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy, surgical and post-operative complications and post-loading outcomes of implants placed by the conventional and aforementioned computer-aided methods.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Capa
-
Istanbul, Capa, Turkey, 34390
- Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, ıstnabul University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy patient with at leat one edentuşous jaw
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with at least one edentulous jaw with healthy systemic and oral status without severe alveolar bone athrophy, major alveolar hard and/or soft tissue deficiency, mouth opening restriction, heavy smoking (> 10 /per day) and parafunctional habits were included in the study.
- All patients were initially evaluated for the suitability of an implant supported fixed prosthesis and any patients unsuitable for such prosthetic superstructure (i.e. severe hard and soft tissue athrophy, insufficient hygiene practice etc.) were excluded.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Conventional implant placement method
The patients in ths group will be treated by conventional, "free-hand" implant placement
|
Dental implants placed via conventional free-hand method
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Computer-guidedimplant placement
In this group, the patients will be treated by implants placed via computer generated SLA guides
|
Compute generated Mucosa-supported single-type guides
Other Names:
Computer generated, Multiple type Bone-supported guides
Other Names:
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Tayfun Ozdemir, Prof.Dr., Section head: Department of Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istabul University
- Principal Investigator: Volkan Arısan, Dr.Med.Dent, Department of Oral Implantology, Istanbul University
- Study Director: Cuneyt Z Karabuda, Prof.Dr., Department of Oral Implantology, Istanbul University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol. 2010 Jan;81(1):43-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090348.
- Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Sep;21(9):980-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01957.x. Epub 2010 May 24.
- Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Mumcu E, Ozdemir T. Implant positioning errors in freehand and computer-aided placement methods: a single-blind clinical comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):190-204. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2691.
- Arisan V, Bolukbasi N, Oksuz L. Computer-assisted flapless implant placement reduces the incidence of surgery-related bacteremia. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Dec;17(9):1985-93. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0886-y. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- Stereolithographic guides
- Implant with SLA (Other Identifier: Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prosthesis
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedAmputation | Prosthesis | Prosthesis UserUnited States
-
University Medical Center GroningenZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentRecruitingAmputation | Prosthesis | Prosthesis UserNetherlands
-
University Medical Center GroningenZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentCompletedAmputation | Prosthesis | Prosthesis UserNetherlands
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Completed
-
University of SharjahEnrolling by invitationComplete Edentulism | Survival, Prosthesis | Failure, Prosthesis | Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported | Complication;ProsthesesUnited Arab Emirates
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesActive, not recruitingDental Prosthesis Failure | Dental Prosthesis ComplicationUnited States
-
Cukurova UniversityCompletedSurvival, Prosthesis | Clinical Acceptability, ProsthesisTurkey
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesActive, not recruitingDental Prosthesis Failure | Dental Prosthesis ComplicationUnited States
-
Menoufia UniversityRecruiting
-
Peking University Third HospitalPeking University First Hospital; Peking University People's Hospital; Beijing... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Dental Implants
-
Z-SystemsRecruitingMissing TeethSwitzerland, Germany
-
National Research Centre, EgyptCompleted
-
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and...RecruitingDental ImplantsUnited Arab Emirates
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingMarginal Bone Loss | One-piece Implants Versus Two-piece Implants During the Osseointegration PhaseEgypt
-
The Campbell Clinic, UKRecruiting
-
University of MilanCompletedDental Implant | Edentulism | Dental Implant TherapyItaly
-
NeodentCompleted
-
BranemarkklinikenCompleted
-
University of CopenhagenRigshospitalet, Denmark; ITI Foundation; GigtforeningenCompletedDental Implant | Primary Sjögren Syndrome