Cost Effectiveness Of Sunitinib In Central America And Caribbean

April 17, 2012 updated by: Pfizer

Cost Effectiveness Of Sunitinib Vs IFN-Alfa Or Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa As First-Line Treatment In MRCC In Central America And The Caribbean

Primary Hypothesis: The therapy with Sunitinib represents better cost-effectiveness than IFN-α in first-line treatment for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) in Central America and Caribbean countries

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study was terminated on 03Feb2011 due to the fact that the anticipated number of patients expected was not reached. The date of cessation of the drug was January 27, 2011. There was no intervention in the treatment or administration of the drug; the study only observed the treatment and collected data. As the study was dependent on the arrival of new patients with metastatic renal cancer, which was of a very low incidence, the study was terminated. Efficacy, adverse events or other safety issues were not factors in terminating the study. Lack of patients was the only reason.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Panama City, Panama
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult men and women with mRCC will be evaluated for entering the study. The decision to use Sunitinib, IFN-α or Bevacizumab + IFN must be a joint decision made by the subject and the investigator. The investigator must discuss product information with the subject as per usual practice.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of a personally signed (or legally acceptable representative) and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
  • Adult (18 years old or older) men and women with confirmed diagnosis of mRCC treated with Sutent, IFN-α or Bevacizumab + IFN ; on the selected institutions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adult men or women with RCCm treated with any other medication that is not Sutent, IFN-α or Bevacizumab + IFN.
  • Adult men or women with mRCC with palliative care.
  • Adult men or women with RCC without metastasis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Central America and Caribbean
Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Panama, Costa Rica, Honduras, Trinidad & Tobago
Treatment for mRCC as indication approved and physician criterium

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of patients that present metastasis when consulting for first time
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Rate of use of Sutent, IFN-α and Bevacizumab + IFN-α as first-line treatment
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Hospitalization average with Sutent, with IFN-α, and with Bevacizumab + IFN-α
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Rate of success in first-line treatment with Sutent, in first-line treatment with IFN-α and in first-line treatment with Bevacizumab + IFN-α
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Average number of cycles of Sutent, IFN-α and Bevacizumab + IFN in first-line treatment
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of adverse effects with the use of Sunitinib, IFN-α and Bevacizumab + IFN
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Quality of life in patients using an approved quality questionnaire
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Costs-benefit of each treatment
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
PFY (progression free years) with each treatment
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
LY (life years) with each treatment
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
QALYs (quality adjusted life years) with each treatment
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
ICER (incremental cost effectiveness ratio) of PFY and LY with each treatment
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Sunitinib

3
Subscribe