ToGA Study - A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab) in Combination With Chemotherapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With HER2-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer

October 31, 2014 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of First-line Herceptin in Combination With a Fluoropyrimidine and Cisplatin Versus Chemotherapy Alone on Overall Survival in Patients With HER2-positive Advanced Gastric Cancer

This parallel, randomized, open-label, multi-centre study will evaluate the effect on overall survival of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in combination with a chemotherapy compared to the chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) will be administered as intravenous infusion of 6 mg/kg (loading dose 8 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. The chemotherapy consists of a combination of 6 cycles of fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks), or capecitabine (Xeloda, 1000 mg/m2 po twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Treatment with trastuzumab (Herceptin) will continue until disease progression. The target sample size is 300-600 patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

584

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Adelaide, Australia, 5011
      • Kurralta Park, Australia, 5037
      • Melbourne, Australia, 3128
      • Milton, Australia, 4064
      • Perth, Australia, 6008
      • Sydney, Australia, 2217
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
      • Barretos, Brazil, 14784-400
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20231-050
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05403-010
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04023-900
      • Beijing, China, 100021
      • Beijing, China, 100071
      • Beijing, China, 100853
      • Beijing, China, 100036
      • Guangdong, China, 510515
      • Guangzhou, China, 510060
      • Jiangsu, China, 210009
      • Nanjing, China, 210002
      • Shanghai, China, 200032
      • Shanghai, China, 200025
      • Shanghai, China, 200433
      • Shanghai, China, 200080
      • Shanghai, China, 200003
      • Shanghai, China, 200092
      • Suzhou, China, 215006
      • Wuhan, China, 430030
      • San Jose, Costa Rica, 10103
      • San José, Costa Rica
      • Herlev, Denmark, 2730
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
      • Tampere, Finland, 33520
      • Brest, France, 29609
      • Caen, France, 14076
      • Colmar, France, 68024
      • Lille, France, 59020
      • Marseille, France, 13273
      • Reims, France, 51092
      • Rouen, France, 76031
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
      • Mainz, Germany, 55101
      • München, Germany, 81675
      • Trier, Germany, 54290
      • Witten, Germany, 58455
      • Guatemala City, Guatemala, 01015
      • Hyderabad, India, 500 033
      • Kochi, India, 682304
      • Mumbai, India, 400026
      • New Delhi, India, 110 029
      • Ancona, Italy, 60121
      • Firenze, Italy, 50139
      • Napoli, Italy, 80131
      • Parma, Italy, 43100
      • Roma, Italy, 00168
      • Udine, Italy, 33100
      • Aichi, Japan, 464-8681
      • Chiba, Japan, 277-8577
      • Ehime, Japan, 791-0280
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 812-8582
      • Hyogo, Japan, 650-0017
      • Nagano, Japan, 384-0392
      • Osaka, Japan, 569-8686
      • Osaka, Japan, 589-8511
      • Saitama, Japan, 350-1298
      • Saitama, Japan, 362-0806
      • Shizuoka, Japan, 411-8777
      • Tochigi, Japan, 320-0834
      • Tokyo, Japan, 113-8677
      • Tokyo, Japan, 135-8550
      • Tokyo, Japan, 135-8577
      • Yamagata, Japan, 990-8520
      • Buchun, Korea, Republic of, 420-021
      • Bundang City, Korea, Republic of, 463-802
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 702-210
      • Goyang-si, Korea, Republic of, 410-769
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of, 602-715
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-720
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-170
      • Guadalajara, Mexico, 44280
      • Merida, Mexico, 97500
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 14000
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 06760
      • Monterrey, Mexico, 64020
      • Panama City, Panama
      • Callao, Peru
      • Lima, Peru, 11
      • Lima, Peru, 18
      • Braga, Portugal, 4700
      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-075
      • Faro, Portugal, 8000
      • Guimaraes, Portugal, 4810-055
      • Lisboa, Portugal, 1649-035
      • Lisboa, Portugal, 1099-023
      • Porto, Portugal, 4200-319
      • Porto, Portugal, 4099-001
      • Porto, Portugal, 4200-072
      • Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454 087
      • Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620905
      • Ivanovo, Russian Federation, 153040
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420029
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 125284
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 115478
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 129128
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117837
      • Ryazan, Russian Federation, 390011
      • Samara, Russian Federation, 443031
      • St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
      • St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 195067
      • St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197758
      • UFA, Russian Federation, 450054
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150054
      • Cape Town, South Africa, 1925
      • Cape Town, South Africa, 7506
      • Durban, South Africa, 4091
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08907
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08041
      • Girona, Spain, 17007
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
      • Valencia, Spain, 46009
      • Valencia, Spain, 41014
      • Changhua, Taiwan, 500
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 00112
      • Istanbul, Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34300
      • Izmir, Turkey, 35100
      • Izmir, Turkey, 35340
      • Shhiye, Ankara, Turkey, 06100
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B9 5SS
      • Denbigh, United Kingdom, LL18 5UJ
      • Dundee, United Kingdom, DD1 9SY
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G12 0YN
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M2O 4BX
      • Weston Super Mare, United Kingdom, BS23 4TQ
      • Wirral, United Kingdom, CH63 4JY
      • Wolverhampton, United Kingdom, WV10 0QP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients >=18 years of age
  • Inoperable locally advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic cancer of the stomach or gastro-esophageal junction
  • Adenocarcinoma
  • HER2-positive tumors

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease
  • Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome
  • History of cardiac disease
  • Dyspnoea at rest, due to complications of advanced malignancy or other disease, or patients who require supportive oxygen therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Trastuzumab, Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin
Participants received an initial loading dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) trastuzumab i.v. on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks until disease progression; 800 mg/m2 fluorouracil i.v. on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.
Initial loading dose 8 mg/kg i.v. infusion on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v. infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression
Other Names:
  • Herceptin
800 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
Other Names:
  • 5-FU
80 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
1000 mg/m2 p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
Other Names:
  • Xeloda
Active Comparator: Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin
Participants received 800 milligrams per square meter (mg/m2) fluorouracil intravenous (i.v.) on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine orally (p.o.) twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.
800 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
Other Names:
  • 5-FU
80 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
1000 mg/m2 p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
Other Names:
  • Xeloda

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: Baseline (BL), Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
Baseline (BL), Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Overall Survival - Time to Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
The median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of an OS event. Participants were censored at the last date tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
BL, Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or date of death, whichever occurs first. For target lesions (TL), PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of one or more lesions. For non-target lesions (NTL), PD was defined as an unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Progression-Free Survival - Time to Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
The median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of a PFS event. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Time to Progression (TTP) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization and the date of the first occurrence of PD. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor assessment, the last date in the study drug log, or the last date of follow-up.
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Time to Progression - Time to Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
The median time, in months, from the date of randomized to the date of a TTP event. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor assessment, the last date in the study drug log, or the last date of follow-up.
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) Determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
For TLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD. For NTLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels.
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Duration of Response - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Duration of response was defined for responders as the time from the date on which the CR or PR was first recorded to the date on which PD is first noted. Participants were censored on the date of death, the date of last tumor measurement, the last date in study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Duration of Response
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
The median time, in months, of the duration of response. Participants were censored at the date of death, the date of last tumor measurement, the last date in study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Clinical benefit was defined as stable disease (SD), CR, or PR for 6 weeks or longer as determined by RECIST. For TLs, SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as a reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment had started. For NTLs, SD was defined as a persistence of one or more NTLs and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above the normal limits.
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
European Organisation For the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ C-30) Questionnaire Scores
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score equals (=) better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (QLQ STO22) Questionnaire Scores
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
The QLQ-STO22 is a gastric cancer quality of life questionnaire. There are 22 questions concerning disease, treatment related symptoms, side effects, dysphagia, nutritional aspects, and questions about the emotional problems of gastric cancer (dysphagia, pain, reflux, eating restrictions, anxiety, dry mouth, body image, and hair loss). The questions are grouped into five scales and 4 single items which are related to the symptoms of the disease. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 1 question was a yes or no answer). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Pain Intensity Scores as Assessed By Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
The participant assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement.
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Analgesic Medication During the Study
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Analgesic medications were recorded throughout the study until disease progression.
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Body Weight (Kilograms [kg]) at BL
Time Frame: BL
BL
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Body Weight by Percentage Change in Weight
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Change in body weight was categorized as an increase of greater than (>)5 percent (%), no change (plus or minus [±]5%), decrease of >5-10%, or a decrease of >10% from BL to the end of study. Time windows were applied in order to assign visits to weight measurements, and the lowest post-screening value recorded was used for the analysis. The percentage change in weight from screening was summarized over time.
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Steady State Trastuzumab Area Under the Concentration (AUC)
Time Frame: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Individual steady state predicted exposure, as assessed by median AUC (measured as mg multiplied by [*] day per liter [L]) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion. Individual steady state AUC was calculated using all available PK samples from all timepoints.
Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Trastuzumab Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin)
Time Frame: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Median Cmin (measured as milligrams per liter [mg/L]) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion.
Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Trastuzumab Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Median Cmax (measured as mg/L) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion.
Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Trastuzumab

Subscribe