- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01041404
ToGA Study - A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab) in Combination With Chemotherapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With HER2-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer
October 31, 2014 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of First-line Herceptin in Combination With a Fluoropyrimidine and Cisplatin Versus Chemotherapy Alone on Overall Survival in Patients With HER2-positive Advanced Gastric Cancer
This parallel, randomized, open-label, multi-centre study will evaluate the effect on overall survival of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in combination with a chemotherapy compared to the chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.
Trastuzumab (Herceptin) will be administered as intravenous infusion of 6 mg/kg (loading dose 8 mg/kg) every 3 weeks.
The chemotherapy consists of a combination of 6 cycles of fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks), or capecitabine (Xeloda, 1000 mg/m2 po twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks).
Treatment with trastuzumab (Herceptin) will continue until disease progression.
The target sample size is 300-600 patients.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
584
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Adelaide, Australia, 5011
-
Kurralta Park, Australia, 5037
-
Melbourne, Australia, 3128
-
Milton, Australia, 4064
-
Perth, Australia, 6008
-
Sydney, Australia, 2217
-
-
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
-
-
-
-
-
Barretos, Brazil, 14784-400
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20231-050
-
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05403-010
-
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04023-900
-
-
-
-
-
Beijing, China, 100021
-
Beijing, China, 100071
-
Beijing, China, 100853
-
Beijing, China, 100036
-
Guangdong, China, 510515
-
Guangzhou, China, 510060
-
Jiangsu, China, 210009
-
Nanjing, China, 210002
-
Shanghai, China, 200032
-
Shanghai, China, 200025
-
Shanghai, China, 200433
-
Shanghai, China, 200080
-
Shanghai, China, 200003
-
Shanghai, China, 200092
-
Suzhou, China, 215006
-
Wuhan, China, 430030
-
-
-
-
-
San Jose, Costa Rica, 10103
-
San José, Costa Rica
-
-
-
-
-
Herlev, Denmark, 2730
-
Odense, Denmark, 5000
-
-
-
-
-
Tampere, Finland, 33520
-
-
-
-
-
Brest, France, 29609
-
Caen, France, 14076
-
Colmar, France, 68024
-
Lille, France, 59020
-
Marseille, France, 13273
-
Reims, France, 51092
-
Rouen, France, 76031
-
Strasbourg, France, 67098
-
-
-
-
-
Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
-
Mainz, Germany, 55101
-
München, Germany, 81675
-
Trier, Germany, 54290
-
Witten, Germany, 58455
-
-
-
-
-
Guatemala City, Guatemala, 01015
-
-
-
-
-
Hyderabad, India, 500 033
-
Kochi, India, 682304
-
Mumbai, India, 400026
-
New Delhi, India, 110 029
-
-
-
-
-
Ancona, Italy, 60121
-
Firenze, Italy, 50139
-
Napoli, Italy, 80131
-
Parma, Italy, 43100
-
Roma, Italy, 00168
-
Udine, Italy, 33100
-
-
-
-
-
Aichi, Japan, 464-8681
-
Chiba, Japan, 277-8577
-
Ehime, Japan, 791-0280
-
Fukuoka, Japan, 812-8582
-
Hyogo, Japan, 650-0017
-
Nagano, Japan, 384-0392
-
Osaka, Japan, 569-8686
-
Osaka, Japan, 589-8511
-
Saitama, Japan, 350-1298
-
Saitama, Japan, 362-0806
-
Shizuoka, Japan, 411-8777
-
Tochigi, Japan, 320-0834
-
Tokyo, Japan, 113-8677
-
Tokyo, Japan, 135-8550
-
Tokyo, Japan, 135-8577
-
Yamagata, Japan, 990-8520
-
-
-
-
-
Buchun, Korea, Republic of, 420-021
-
Bundang City, Korea, Republic of, 463-802
-
Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 702-210
-
Goyang-si, Korea, Republic of, 410-769
-
Pusan, Korea, Republic of, 602-715
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-720
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-170
-
-
-
-
-
Guadalajara, Mexico, 44280
-
Merida, Mexico, 97500
-
Mexico City, Mexico, 14000
-
Mexico City, Mexico, 06760
-
Monterrey, Mexico, 64020
-
-
-
-
-
Panama City, Panama
-
-
-
-
-
Callao, Peru
-
Lima, Peru, 11
-
Lima, Peru, 18
-
-
-
-
-
Braga, Portugal, 4700
-
Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-075
-
Faro, Portugal, 8000
-
Guimaraes, Portugal, 4810-055
-
Lisboa, Portugal, 1649-035
-
Lisboa, Portugal, 1099-023
-
Porto, Portugal, 4200-319
-
Porto, Portugal, 4099-001
-
Porto, Portugal, 4200-072
-
-
-
-
-
Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454 087
-
Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620905
-
Ivanovo, Russian Federation, 153040
-
Kazan, Russian Federation, 420029
-
Moscow, Russian Federation, 125284
-
Moscow, Russian Federation, 115478
-
Moscow, Russian Federation, 129128
-
Moscow, Russian Federation, 117837
-
Ryazan, Russian Federation, 390011
-
Samara, Russian Federation, 443031
-
St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
-
St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 195067
-
St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197758
-
UFA, Russian Federation, 450054
-
Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150054
-
-
-
-
-
Cape Town, South Africa, 1925
-
Cape Town, South Africa, 7506
-
Durban, South Africa, 4091
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08036
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08907
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08041
-
Girona, Spain, 17007
-
Madrid, Spain, 28041
-
Valencia, Spain, 46009
-
Valencia, Spain, 41014
-
-
-
-
-
Changhua, Taiwan, 500
-
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 00112
-
-
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34300
-
Izmir, Turkey, 35100
-
Izmir, Turkey, 35340
-
Shhiye, Ankara, Turkey, 06100
-
-
-
-
-
Birmingham, United Kingdom, B9 5SS
-
Denbigh, United Kingdom, LL18 5UJ
-
Dundee, United Kingdom, DD1 9SY
-
Glasgow, United Kingdom, G12 0YN
-
Manchester, United Kingdom, M2O 4BX
-
Weston Super Mare, United Kingdom, BS23 4TQ
-
Wirral, United Kingdom, CH63 4JY
-
Wolverhampton, United Kingdom, WV10 0QP
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients >=18 years of age
- Inoperable locally advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic cancer of the stomach or gastro-esophageal junction
- Adenocarcinoma
- HER2-positive tumors
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease
- Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome
- History of cardiac disease
- Dyspnoea at rest, due to complications of advanced malignancy or other disease, or patients who require supportive oxygen therapy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Trastuzumab, Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin
Participants received an initial loading dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) trastuzumab i.v. on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v.
every 3 weeks until disease progression; 800 mg/m2 fluorouracil i.v. on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.
|
Initial loading dose 8 mg/kg i.v.
infusion on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v.
infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression
Other Names:
800 mg/m2 i.v.
infusion on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
Other Names:
80 mg/m2 i.v.
infusion on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
1000 mg/m2 p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin
Participants received 800 milligrams per square meter (mg/m2) fluorouracil intravenous (i.v.) on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine orally (p.o.) twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.
|
800 mg/m2 i.v.
infusion on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
Other Names:
80 mg/m2 i.v.
infusion on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
1000 mg/m2 p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: Baseline (BL), Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
|
Baseline (BL), Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Overall Survival - Time to Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
The median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of an OS event.
Participants were censored at the last date tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
|
BL, Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or date of death, whichever occurs first.
For target lesions (TL), PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of one or more lesions.
For non-target lesions (NTL), PD was defined as an unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
|
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Progression-Free Survival - Time to Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
The median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of a PFS event.
Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
|
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Time to Progression (TTP) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization and the date of the first occurrence of PD.
Participants were censored at the last date of tumor assessment, the last date in the study drug log, or the last date of follow-up.
|
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Time to Progression - Time to Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
The median time, in months, from the date of randomized to the date of a TTP event.
Participants were censored at the last date of tumor assessment, the last date in the study drug log, or the last date of follow-up.
|
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) Determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
For TLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD.
For NTLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels.
|
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Duration of Response - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
Duration of response was defined for responders as the time from the date on which the CR or PR was first recorded to the date on which PD is first noted.
Participants were censored on the date of death, the date of last tumor measurement, the last date in study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
|
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Duration of Response
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
The median time, in months, of the duration of response.
Participants were censored at the date of death, the date of last tumor measurement, the last date in study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
|
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
Time Frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
Clinical benefit was defined as stable disease (SD), CR, or PR for 6 weeks or longer as determined by RECIST.
For TLs, SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as a reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment had started.
For NTLs, SD was defined as a persistence of one or more NTLs and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above the normal limits.
|
BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
European Organisation For the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ C-30) Questionnaire Scores
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties).
Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent').
Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score equals (=) better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
|
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (QLQ STO22) Questionnaire Scores
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
The QLQ-STO22 is a gastric cancer quality of life questionnaire.
There are 22 questions concerning disease, treatment related symptoms, side effects, dysphagia, nutritional aspects, and questions about the emotional problems of gastric cancer (dysphagia, pain, reflux, eating restrictions, anxiety, dry mouth, body image, and hair loss).
The questions are grouped into five scales and 4 single items which are related to the symptoms of the disease.
Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 1 question was a yes or no answer).
A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
|
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Pain Intensity Scores as Assessed By Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
The participant assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS.
The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain".
A negative change indicated improvement.
|
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Analgesic Medication During the Study
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
Analgesic medications were recorded throughout the study until disease progression.
|
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Body Weight (Kilograms [kg]) at BL
Time Frame: BL
|
BL
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Body Weight by Percentage Change in Weight
Time Frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
Change in body weight was categorized as an increase of greater than (>)5 percent (%), no change (plus or minus [±]5%), decrease of >5-10%, or a decrease of >10% from BL to the end of study.
Time windows were applied in order to assign visits to weight measurements, and the lowest post-screening value recorded was used for the analysis.
The percentage change in weight from screening was summarized over time.
|
BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
|
|
Steady State Trastuzumab Area Under the Concentration (AUC)
Time Frame: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
|
Individual steady state predicted exposure, as assessed by median AUC (measured as mg multiplied by [*] day per liter [L]) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion.
Individual steady state AUC was calculated using all available PK samples from all timepoints.
|
Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
|
|
Trastuzumab Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin)
Time Frame: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
|
Median Cmin (measured as milligrams per liter [mg/L]) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion.
|
Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
|
|
Trastuzumab Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
|
Median Cmax (measured as mg/L) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion.
|
Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, Feng-Yi F, Xu JM, Lee KW, Jiao SC, Chong JL, Lopez-Sanchez RI, Price T, Gladkov O, Stoss O, Hill J, Ng V, Lehle M, Thomas M, Kiermaier A, Ruschoff J. HER2 screening data from ToGA: targeting HER2 in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jul;18(3):476-84. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0402-y. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
- Satoh T, Bang YJ, Gotovkin EA, Hamamoto Y, Kang YK, Moiseyenko VM, Ohtsu A, Van Cutsem E, Al-Sakaff N, Urspruch A, Hill J, Weber HA, Chung HC; ToGA Trial Investigators. Quality of life in the trastuzumab for gastric cancer trial. Oncologist. 2014 Jul;19(7):712-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0058. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
- Satoh T, Omuro Y, Sasaki Y, Hamamoto Y, Boku N, Tamura T, Ohtsu A. Pharmacokinetic analysis of capecitabine and cisplatin in combination with trastuzumab in Japanese patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Apr;69(4):949-55. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1783-9. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
- Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Ruschoff J, Kang YK; ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. Epub 2010 Aug 19. Erratum In: Lancet. 2010 Oct 16;376(9749):1302.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2010
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 29, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
December 31, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 5, 2014
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2014
Last Verified
October 1, 2014
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Stomach Diseases
- Stomach Neoplasms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Antimetabolites
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
- Trastuzumab
- Fluorouracil
- Capecitabine
Other Study ID Numbers
- BO18255
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer
-
City of Hope Medical CenterCompletedGastric Cancer | Gastric Adenocarcinoma | Gastric Cancer Stage IV | Gastric Neoplasm | Gastric Cancer Metastatic to Lung | Gastric Cancer Stage | Gastric Cancer Metastatic to Liver | Gastric Cancer Stage III | Gastric Cancer Stage II | Gastric Lesion | Gastric Cancer in Situ | Gastric Cancer Stage IIIB | Gastric... and other conditionsUnited States, Japan
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Clinical Stage III Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage 0 Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Clinical Stage III Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IVA Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage IB Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic... and other conditionsUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterCompletedAdenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Recurrent Gastric Cancer | Diffuse Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Intestinal Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Mixed Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIC Gastric Cancer and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedGastric Adenocarcinoma | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Stage II Gastric Cancer | Stage III Gastric CancerUnited States
-
Lin LiuRecruitingGastric Carcinoma | Gastric Neoplasm | Gastric Cancer Adenocarcinoma Metastatic | Gastric (cardia, Body) CancerChina
-
Ukrainian Society of Clinical OncologyRecruitingGastric Cancer | Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer | Gastric Cancer Stage III | Gastric Cancer Stage IIUkraine
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Epstein-Barr Virus Positive | Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency | Stage IB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage III Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedGastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma | Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma | Stage IB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7United States
-
Shanghai Changzheng HospitalNot yet recruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
Clinical Trials on Trastuzumab
-
Henan Cancer HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterAstraZenecaRecruitingNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIB | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage II | Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIAUnited States, Canada
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)NRG OncologyCompletedBreast Ductal Carcinoma In SituUnited States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Korea, Republic of
-
Fudan UniversityNot yet recruitingHER2-positive Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer With Brain Metastasis
-
Tanvex BioPharma USA, Inc.CompletedBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasms | HER2-positive Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Early-stage Breast CancerBelarus, Chile, Georgia, Hungary, India, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Russian Federation, Ukraine
-
Fudan UniversityNot yet recruitingMetastatic Breast Cancer
-
Spanish Breast Cancer Research GroupCompleted
-
Fudan UniversityHoffmann-La RocheUnknown
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedMale Breast Carcinoma | Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer AJCC v7United States, Puerto Rico