- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01046175
Effect of Air-stacking on Peak Cough Flow in Patients With Acute Cervical or High Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury
November 11, 2010 updated by: Ullevaal University Hospital
Effect of Two Different Air-stacking Techniques, Combined With Manually Assisted Cough, on Peak Cough Flow (PCF) in Patients With Acute Cervical or High Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury
Respiratory complications continue to be one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in people with spinal cord injury, especially among cervical and higher thoracic injuries.
Both inspiratory and expiratory function are often severely decreased, leading to respiratory complications, such as atelectasis, pneumonia and ventilatory failure.
The prevention of these respiratory complications needs to begin immediately after injury.
To achieve effective expelling of secretions before they form mucus plugs, it is essential to improve patients ability to cough.
Manually assisting the cough is one way of increasing cough flow, but an effective cough also requires adequate lung volumes.
The emphasis should therefore be on expansion of the lungs before coughing.
One way of expanding the lungs is by air-stacking.
In air-stacking insufflations are stacked in the lungs to maximally expand them.
Cough can be valued by measuring Peak Cough Flow (PCF).
By combining air-stacking with manually assisted cough the PCF can be increased sufficiently.
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of two different air-stacking techniques on PCF, air-stacking on a respirator versus air-stacking with a manual resuscitator.
Study Overview
Status
Withdrawn
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
10
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway, 0407
- Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- acute cervical or high thoracic spinal cord injury admitted to the ICU
Exclusion Criteria:
- substantial abdominal or thoracic injury
- substantial brain damage
- intubated or tracheostomized patients
- not able to cooperate
- pregnant women
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Airstacking with manual resuscitator
Air-stacking is a type of lung volume recruitment technique where insufflations are stacked in the lungs to maximally expand them, here done with a manual resuscitator.
|
Stacking air into the lungs up to maximal insufflation capacity (MIC)with a manual resuscitator
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Air-stacking with ventilator
Air-stacking is a type of lung volume recruitment technique where insufflations are stacked in the lungs to maximally expand them, here done with a ventilator.
|
Stacking air into the lungs to maximal insufflation capacity (MIC) with ventilator
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Peak cough flow (PCF)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Patient preference of air-stacking technique
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
|
Physiotherapist preference of air-stacking technique
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Helene L Soberg, PhD, Oslo University Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
February 1, 2011
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
June 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 8, 2010
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
January 11, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
November 15, 2010
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 11, 2010
Last Verified
December 1, 2009
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- S-09326b
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.