Augmented Infant Resuscitator to Enhance Newborn Ventilation (AIR)

March 26, 2021 updated by: Kristian R. Olson, M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Augmented Infant Resuscitator (AIR): Transitioning a Novel Behavior Change Innovation to Drive Newborn Ventilation Skills Enhancement

Augmented Infant Resuscitator (AIR) is an inexpensive add-on, compatible with nearly every existing bag-valve mask and many types of ventilation equipment. AIR monitors ventilation quality and provides real-time objective feedback and actionable cues to clinicians to both shorten training times and improve resuscitation quality, adoption, retention, and confidence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Longitudinal, randomized control trial that examined the effectiveness of AIR among 270 participants, with 1,080 recorded ventilation scenarios, and across 20 sites in Uganda and the U.S. Birth attendants - including a mix of midwives, nurses, respiratory therapists, pediatricians, and neonatologists - with recent HBB and/or NRP training were recruited to participate in this randomized control trial. Participants ventilated training mannequins for a fixed duration of time. Participants were randomized to receive visual feedback from AIR (intervention) or have the AIR feedback covered (control). They were then requested to administer effective ventilation and verbally assess the mannequin condition. All mannequins appeared to be identical, but each session's mannequin was randomly selected with an upper airway that was normal, partially leaking, or partially obstructed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Midwives, nurses, respiratory therapists, pediatricians, and neonatologists working as birth attendants in select hospitals in Uganda and the U.S. who are either previous trained in Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) and/or have a current Newborn Resuscitation Program (NRP) certification.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Blinded to visual feedback from AIR device
Providers did not receive AIR device feedback during newborn mannequin ventilation
Device provides no visual feedback to clinician but records data on ventilation effectiveness
Experimental: Not blinded to visual feedback from AIR device
Providers did receive AIR device feedback during newborn mannequin ventilation
Device provides visual feedback related to air leak, obstruction, hyperventilation, hypoventilation, and harsh breaths
Other Names:
  • AIR device with feedback

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effective bag-mask ventilation
Time Frame: 2 minutes
Duration of effective bag-mask ventilation by clinician during a 2-minute trial. [This will be a cumulative duration of the two minutes. This is measured internally from the AIR device. "Effective ventilation" is defined as having all three of the following conditions simultaneously: (1) Correct rate (30-60 breaths per minute); (2) Absence of significant leak (compliance >4.0mL/cm H2O); and (3) Absence of a significant airway blockage (defined as compliance <0.10 mL/cm H2O or resistance >90 cmH2O/L/s). These measurements are determined by sensors in the AIR device for both arms of the study. Their accuracy for manikin use was determined to be 100% in the following trial: Bennett el al. Anesth Analgesia. 2018 Mar;126(3):947-955. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.]
2 minutes
Time to effective bag-mask ventilation
Time Frame: 2 minutes
How long it takes for clinician to achieve effective ventilation during 2-minute trial. [This is time from when the mask first touches the face of the manikin until all three icons are green. This is measured by a Research Assistant using a stop-watch. Again, "Effective ventilation" is defined as having all three of the following conditions simultaneously and is indicated to the RA by all three icons on the AIR device turning green: (1) Correct rate (30-60 breaths per minute); (2) Absence of significant leak (compliance >4.0mL/cm H2O); and (3) Absence of a significant airway blockage (defined as compliance <0.10 mL/cm H2O or resistance >90 cmH2O/L/s). These measurements are determined by sensors in the AIR device for both arms of the study. Their accuracy for manikin use was determined to be 100% in the following trial: Bennett et al. Anesth Analgesia 2018 Mar;126(3):947-955. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.]
2 minutes
Clinician's correct assessment of mannequin airway issues
Time Frame: 2 minutes
Ability of clinician to correctly assess three different manikin airway issues: normal, air leak, or obstruction. [Manikin "conditions" are blinded to the participants and were either normal (as supplied by the manufacturer, had a "leak" insert (introduced compliance >4mL/cm H2O), or had an "obstruction" insert (introduced a reduction in compliance <0.10mL/cm H2O and resistance >90 cm H2O/L/s. As per the parameters in the following paper: Bennett et al. Anesth Analgesia. 2018 Mar;126(3):947-955. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.]
2 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2013P002204

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perinatal Asphyxia

Clinical Trials on AIR device without feedback

3
Subscribe