- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01055925
Clinical Comparative Trial of a Modified Polyurethane Dressing and Aquacel
January 25, 2010 updated by: Klinik Bogenhausen
The almost single disadvantage of conventional polyurethane film dressings, an uncontrolled leakage, is probably as often described as its numerous advantages for split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites.
This shortcoming can be overcome by perforating the polyurethane dressing (MPD), which permits a controlled leakage into a secondary absorbent dressing.
The study was conducted to compare the MPD-system and Aquacel® (ConvaTec), a hydrofiber wound dressing, which also seems to fulfill all criteria of an ideal donor site dressing.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Study Type
Interventional
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Bavaria
-
Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81925
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Academic Hospital Munich Bogenhausen, Technical University Munich
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- skin graft donor site anterolateral thigh
- men and women > 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- informed consent missing
- repeated skin graft take or prior injury at the observed site
- Subject unlikely to comply with protocol, e.g., uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and unlikelihood of completing the study
- History of hypersensitivity to the investigational products
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: MPV
|
|
Active Comparator: Aquacel
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
reepithelialization rate
Time Frame: 10th day postoperative
|
10th day postoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
pain, scar formation, complications (e.g. infection), costs
Time Frame: pain until and during dressing removal, scar formation 60 days following surgery
|
pain until and during dressing removal, scar formation 60 days following surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 25, 2010
First Posted (Estimate)
January 26, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 26, 2010
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 25, 2010
Last Verified
January 1, 2010
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MPV-AQUACEL
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Reepithelialization of Skin Graft Donor Sites
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalMedline IndustriesCompletedSplit-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites
-
Lee's Pharmaceutical LimitedGuangzhou First People's Hospital; Ruijin HospitalCompletedSplit-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalWithdrawnBurns | Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterWithdrawnSplit-thickness Skin Graft Donor SitesUnited States
-
Rambam Health Care CampusWithdrawnTreatment of Skin Graft Donor SiteIsrael
-
ULURU Inc.CompletedPartial-thickness Skin Donor SitesUnited States
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalUnknownEvaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Conditioned Medium-derived Pleiotropic Factor in Treating Donor SitesChina
-
Tang-Du HospitalCompletedDisorder of Skin Donor Site | Skin Graft Disorder | Wound Healing Disturbance of
-
University Hospitals, LeicesterTerminatedSkin Graft | Donor Site ComplicationUnited Kingdom
-
NYU Langone HealthCompleted
Clinical Trials on modified polyurethane film dressing (OpSite, Smith&Nephew, London, UK)
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityWithdrawn