Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Local Anaesthesia (TENS-LA)

November 29, 2023 updated by: University Hospitals, Leicester

The Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Local Anaesthetic Cream in Alleviating the Pain of Local Anaesthetic Injections in Adults - A Randomised Controlled Trial

TENS-LA trial is a randomised control trial to assess the possible efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on eliminating or reducing the pain of local anaesthetic injection for minor surgical procedures. Comparison is done with a mixture of local anaesthetic cream (EMLA) which is used at times for the same purpose. Though local procedures are carried out in various parts of the body, this trial will be conducted specifically on patients undergoing a split skin graft harvest from the thigh. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria and are willing to participate will be randomised to receive either TENS or EMLA.

Results will be analysed based on the pain score records at the end of the trial

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing a split skin graft harvest will be selected from theatre lists and will be given complete information regarding the nature of trial, possible complications, risks and advantages by sending them a Patient Information Sheet at least a week prior to the procedure when they are send an appointment. On the day of procedure, either the Chief Investigator or one of the other two Investigators will see the patient in the Theatre Arrivals Area and have a full discussion on the details of the trial and will answer all their questions. Patients willing to take part and are within the inclusion criteria and does not have any of the exclusion criteria will be randomised to either the study group or the control group after obtaining informed consent.

The trial group will have the TENS to the area planned for injection for 30 minutes before injection of the local anaesthetic (a combination of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 1% lignocaine with 1/200,000 adrenaline). The control group will have EMLA applied on the site planned for local anaesthetic injection and after 1 hour , will be removed and immediately injected with the same anaesthetic solution (this is already a procedure practised by some of the surgeons).

Pain perception will be evaluated using two Numeric Pain Rating Scales in the study and control groups- one to assess the pain of needle penetration and the second to assess the pain of local infiltration. The Numeric pain scale is filled in by the doctor as indicated by the patient. Pulse rate and Blood Pressure monitoring will be carried out as an objective measurement of response to pain (these are routinely recorded when patient is in the theater for a procedure). Patient involvement in the study ends at this point.

Analysis of the outcome will be done at the end of the trial period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leicester, United Kingdom, LE1 5WW
        • University Hospitals of Leicester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Both interventions will be carried out in adult patients. For the purpose of standardisation and avoiding the variations from different sites in the body, and different surgical procedures, the site will be the thigh in both groups which is the donor site for a split skin graft.

Inclusion criteria:

• Adult patients aged 18 to 90 years undergoing a split skin graft harvest under local anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients below 18 and above 90 years of age
  • Patients with dementia or other mental abnormalities causing incapacity.
  • Pregnant ladies
  • Patients with pace maker or ICD
  • Patients with history of epilepsy or aneurysm
  • Patients with undiagnosed skin or pain conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TENS arm (trial arm)
The trial group will have the TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator) to the area planned for injection for at least 30 minutes before injection of the local anaesthetic solution.

The trial group will have the TENS to the area planned for injection for at least 30 minutes before injection of the local anaesthetic solution.

Pain perception will be evaluated using two Numeric Pain Rating Scales in the study and control groups- one to assess the pain of needle penetration and the second to assess the pain of local infiltration.

Other: EMLA arm (Control arm)
The control group will have EMLA (Eutatic mixture of local anaesthetic) applied on the site planned for local anaesthetic injection and after 1 hour, will be removed and immediately injected with the same anaesthetic solution.

The control group will have EMLA applied on the site planned for local anaesthetic injection and after 1 hour, will be removed and immediately injected with the same anaesthetic solution (this is already a procedure practised by many of the surgeons).

Pain perception will be evaluated using two Numeric Pain Rating Scales in the study and control groups- one to assess the pain of needle penetration and the second to assess the pain of local infiltration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary outcome is pain of local anaesthetic injection after application of TENS or LA cream as measured by two Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes

Pain perception will be evaluated using two Numeric Pain Rating Scales in the study and control groups. One scale will assess the pain caused by needle piercing the skin and the second will do so for the pain caused by infiltration of local anaesthetic agent.

The scale used is "Numeric Pain rating scale" which shows a transverse line with values from 0 to 10 from left to right where 0 indicates no pain and 10 worst possible pain. The middle, which is 5 indicates moderate pain. Outcome of the intervention is better towards the left indicating less pain and worse towards the right indicating more pain.

No sub scales are used.

10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in blood pressure in response to injection of local anaesthetic
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Blood Pressure (BP) monitoring will be carried out as an objective measurement of response to pain. The unit of measurement is mm of Hg (millimetres of Mercury). This measurement is to assess if there is a rise in BP in response to the local anaesthetic injection after application of either TENS or EMLA and if present, to what extent. The changes will be analysed with respect to the baseline BP recording of the patient.
10 minutes
Changes in heart rate in response to injection of local anaesthetic
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Heart rate (HR) monitoring will be carried out as an objective measurement of response to pain. The unit of measurement is number per minute. This measurement is to assess if there is a rise in HR in response to the local anaesthetic injection after application of either TENS or EMLA and if present, to what extent. The changes will be analysed with respect to the baseline HR recording of the patient.
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rajshree Jayarajan, University Hospitals, Leicester

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 18, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 18, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skin Graft

Clinical Trials on TENS machine

3
Subscribe