Efficacy Study of Olaparib With Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Gastric Cancer Patients

July 13, 2023 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Randomised, Double Blinded, Multicentre Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy of Olaparib (AZD2281, KU-0059436) in Combination With Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Progress Following First-line Therapy

To assess the efficacy of olaparib when given in combination with paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel alone as defined by progression-free survival (PFS), in all patients with recurrent and metastatic gastric cancer who progress following first-line therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

124

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Goyang-si, Korea, Republic of, 410-769
        • Research Site
      • Jeonnam, Korea, Republic of, 519-763
        • Research Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
        • Research Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 134-791
        • Research Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
        • Research Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Research Site
      • Taegu, Korea, Republic of, 705-035
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 130 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer that has progressed following first line-therapy
  • Confirmed ATM protein status by IHC archival tumour sample
  • At least one lesion (measurable and/or non-measurable) that can be accurately assessed by imaging (CT/MRI) at baseline and follow up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than one prior chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of gastric cancer in the metastatic or recurrent setting
  • Any previous treatment with a PARP inhibitor, including olaparib
  • Patients with second primary cancer, except; adequately treated non melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in situ cancer of the cervix, or other solid tumours curatively treated with no evidence of disease for >5 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Olaparib + paclitaxel
100mg BID oral tablet continuous
iv infusion 80mg/m2 on Day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle
Other Names:
  • Taxol
Active Comparator: 2
paclitaxel + placebo
iv infusion 80mg/m2 on Day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle
Other Names:
  • Taxol
100mg BID oral tablet to match olaparib tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Tumour assessments were carried out at baseline and then follow up assessments taken every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and then every 16 weeks until objective disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed maximum up to 27 months
PFS is defined as the time from randomisation till objective progression or death. In absence of progression or death, the time is calculated from randomisation till last evaluable scanning visit.
Tumour assessments were carried out at baseline and then follow up assessments taken every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and then every 16 weeks until objective disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Patients With Tumours Defined as Homologous Recombination Deficient by Loss of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutation (ATM) Protein [ATM Negative Patients]
Time Frame: Tumour assessments are carried out at baseline and then follow up assessments taken every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and then every 16 weeks until objective disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed maximum up to 27 months
PFS is defined as the time from randomisation till objective progression or death. In absence of progression or death, the time is calculated from randomisation till last evaluable scanning visit.
Tumour assessments are carried out at baseline and then follow up assessments taken every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and then every 16 weeks until objective disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed maximum up to 27 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS) in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Survival follow up from randomisation till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Overall survival is defined as the duration from randomisation till death. In absence of death, the time is calculated from randomisation till the date subject last known to be alive.
Survival follow up from randomisation till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Overall Survival (OS) in ATM Negative Patients
Time Frame: Survival follow up from randomisation till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Overall survival is defined as the duration from randomisation till death. In absence of death, the time is calculated from randomisation till the date subject last known to be alive.
Survival follow up from randomisation till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Tumour assessments carried out at baseline, 28 days before randomisation then every 8 weeks until week 40, after week 40 assessments will be carried out every 16 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Objective response rate is the proportion of patients with at least one measurable lesion at baseline, who experienced complete or partial response at least once during the assessment period, according to the definitions of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1).
Tumour assessments carried out at baseline, 28 days before randomisation then every 8 weeks until week 40, after week 40 assessments will be carried out every 16 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the ATM Negative Patients
Time Frame: Tumour assessments carried out at baseline, 28 days before randomisation then every 8 weeks until week 40, after week 40 assessments will be carried out every 16 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Objective response rate is the proportion of ATM negative patients with at least one measurable lesion at baseline, who experienced complete or partial response at least once during the assessment period, according to the definitions of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1).
Tumour assessments carried out at baseline, 28 days before randomisation then every 8 weeks until week 40, after week 40 assessments will be carried out every 16 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Percentage Change in Tumour Size at Week 8 in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Tumour scans done at Baseline and week 8
Percentage change in tumour size from baseline to Week 8 calculated as 100 X (week 8 tumour size - baseline tumour size) / (baseline tumour size)
Tumour scans done at Baseline and week 8
Percentage Change in Tumour Size at Week 8 in the ATM Negative Patients
Time Frame: Tumour scans done at Baseline and week 8
Percentage change in tumour size from baseline to Week 8 calculated as 100 X (week 8 tumour size - baseline tumour size) / (baseline tumour size)
Tumour scans done at Baseline and week 8
Time to Deterioration in Global Quality of Life (QoL) Score in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of Global QoL score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data
Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time to Deterioration in QoL Fatigue Score in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of fatigue score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data
Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time to Deterioration in QoL Nausea & Vomiting Domain Score in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of nausea & vomiting domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data
Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time to Deterioration in QoL Pain Domain Score in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of pain domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data
Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time to Deterioration in QoL Dysphagia Domain Score in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of dysphagia domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data
Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time to Deterioration in QoL Eating Restriction Domain Score in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of eating restriction domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data
Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time to Deterioration in QoL Stomach Pain Domain Score in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of stomach pain domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data
Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time to Deterioration in QoL Reflux Domain Score in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of reflux domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data
Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time to Deterioration in QoL Anxiety Domain Score in the Overall Study Population
Time Frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of anxiety domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data
Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jane Robertson, BSc, MBCHB, MD, AstraZeneca
  • Principal Investigator: Yung-Jue Bang, MD, Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

February 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal.

All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment:

https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on olaparib

3
Subscribe