Comparison Between Erythromycin and Neomycin Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy

April 27, 2010 updated by: UPECLIN HC FM Botucatu Unesp

Erythromycin Versus Neomycin Treatment for Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy: a Double-blind, Randomised, Controlled Trial.

Comparison between the efficacy of two different antibiotics in patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy. The study is randomized, controlled and double-blinded.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil, 18618970
        • Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - Universidade Estadual Paulista

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hepatic cirrhosis or portal hypertension
  • Hepatic Encephalopathy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute liver failure
  • Neuropsychiatric diseases
  • Inflammatory bowel diseases
  • Intestinal obstruction
  • Shock
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Alcoholic hepatitis
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Antibiotic premedication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Erythromycin
250 mg orally q.i.d.
Active Comparator: Neomycin
1 g orally q.i.d.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recovery of hepatic encephalopathy
Time Frame: three years
comparison of efficacy between two drugs for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy
three years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of hospitalization caused by hepatic encephalopathy
Time Frame: three years
comparison of efficacy between two drugs for reducing the length of hospitalization during treatment of hepatic encephalopathy
three years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fernando G Romeiro, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Unesp
  • Study Chair: Carlos A Caramori, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Unesp

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

April 2, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2010

Last Verified

April 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Cirrhosis

Clinical Trials on Erythromycin

Subscribe