- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01107405
Loteprednol Ophthalmic Base Compared to Loteprednol Ophthalmic Suspension vs Placebo in an Allergen Challenge
February 14, 2012 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Efficacy of Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Base Compared to Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Suspension vs Placebo in a Modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge(CAC) Model
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic base, compared to loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, and vehicle in the prevention of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis in a modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge model and in an environmental model during pollen season.
Comparisons will be made following 2 weeks of dosing.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
101
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14603
- Bausch & Lomb
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Positive history of ocular allergies and positive skin test reaction to cat hair, cat dander, grasses, ragweed, and/or trees within the past 24 months.
- Calculated best-corrected visual acuity of 0.70 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using the ETDRS chart.
- Positive bilateral conjunctival allergen challenge(CAC)reaction within 10 minutes of instillation of the last titration of allergen at visit 1.
- Positive bilateral CAC reaction in 1 out of 3 time points for the initial and re-challenge at visit 2.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known contraindications or sensitivities to the study medication or its components.
- Any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subjects safety or trial parameters.
- Use of disallowed medications during the period indicated prior to study enrollment or during the study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Loteprednol etabonate base (QD)
Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic base dosed once/day.
|
Loteprednol Etabonate ophthalmic base once daily dosing for 2 weeks
|
|
Active Comparator: Loteprednol etabonate base (BID)
Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic base dosed two times/day
|
Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic base BID dosing for 2 weeks
|
|
Active Comparator: Loteprednol etabonate base (QID)
Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic base dosed four times/day.
|
Loteprednol Etabonate ophthalmic base four times/day dosing for 2 week
|
|
Active Comparator: Loteprednol etabonate suspension (QID)
Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension dosed four times/day
|
Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension dosed four times daily for 2 weeks.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle of loteprednol etabonate
Vehicle of loteprednol etabonate, dosed either QD, BID, or QID
|
Vehicle of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic dosed once, twice or four times daily for 2 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ocular Itching
Time Frame: Visit 4 (8 hr re-challenge)
|
Evaluated by subject at 3, 5, and 7 min post challenge on a scale of 0-4 where 0=no itching and 4=incapacitating itch.
|
Visit 4 (8 hr re-challenge)
|
|
Conjunctival Redness
Time Frame: Visit 4 (8 hr re-challenge)
|
Evaluated by investigator at 7, 15 and 20 minutes post challenge on a scale of 0-4 where 0= no redness and 4=extremely severe redness.
|
Visit 4 (8 hr re-challenge)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ocular Itching
Time Frame: Visit 3 (initial challenge)
|
Evaluated by the subject at 3, 5 and 7 min post-challenge on a scale of 0-4 where 0=no itching and 4=incapacitating itch.
|
Visit 3 (initial challenge)
|
|
Conjunctival Redness
Time Frame: Visit 3 (initial challenge)
|
Evaluated by investigator at 7, 15 and 20 minutes post challenge on a scale of 0-4 where 0= no redness and 4=extremely severe redness.
|
Visit 3 (initial challenge)
|
|
Ocular Itching
Time Frame: Visit 4 (initial challenge)
|
Evaluated by the subject at 3, 5 and 7 min post-challenge on a scale of 0-4 where 0=no itching and 4=incapacitating itch.
|
Visit 4 (initial challenge)
|
|
Conjunctival Redness
Time Frame: Visit 4 (initial challenge)
|
Evaluated by investigator at 7, 15 and 20 minutes post challenge on a scale of 0-4 where 0= no redness and 4=extremely severe redness.
|
Visit 4 (initial challenge)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2010
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 19, 2010
First Posted (Estimate)
April 21, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
March 21, 2012
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 14, 2012
Last Verified
February 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 584
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Allergic Conjunctivitis
-
Laboratoires TheaCompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisFrance
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisSingapore
-
Zhaoke (Guangzhou) Ophthalmology Pharmaceutical...CompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisChina
-
NovartisAlcon ResearchCompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisChina
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisUnited States
-
Eleven BiotherapeuticsCompletedAllergic Conjunctivitis (AC)United States
-
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.ORA, Inc.CompletedChronic Allergic Conjunctivitis
-
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.ORA, Inc.CompletedChronic Allergic Conjunctivitis
-
ORA, Inc.CompletedChronic Allergic ConjunctivitisUnited States
-
Aciex Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedAtopic Disease (Including Allergic Conjunctivitis)United States
Clinical Trials on Loteprednol etabonate base (QD)
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedPain | InflammationUnited States
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompleted
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedPain | InflammationUnited States
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedOcular InflammationUnited States
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedPain | Inflammation | CataractUnited States
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.Completed
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedPain | Ocular Inflammation | CataractUnited States
-
Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedDiabetic Macular Edema | Retinal Vein OcclusionUnited States
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedPain | Inflammation | CataractUnited States
-
Price Vision GroupKala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedCorneal Edema | Corneal Endothelial DystrophyUnited States