Evaluation of Loteprednol Etabonate Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery

December 8, 2011 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group Clinical Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Loteprednol Etabonate, 0.5% Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery

This study is being conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of loteprednol etabonate to vehicle for the treatment of postoperative inflammation and pain following cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

407

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14609
        • Bausch & Lomb

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are at least 18 years of age.
  • Subjects who are candidates for routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the study drug or components.
  • Subjects with a severe/serious ocular condition, or any other unstable medical condition, that in the investigator's opinion may preclude study treatment or follow-up.
  • Subjects with elevated intraocular pressure (>/=21mm Hg), uncontrolled glaucoma, or being treated for glaucoma in the study eye.
  • Subjects who are monocular or have pinholed Snellen visual acuity (VA) 20/200 or worse in the non-study eye.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Loteprednol etabonate
Loteprednol etabonate 0.5% ophthalmic suspension
Topical administration of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 1-2 drops in study eye four times a day (QID), postoperative day 1-14.
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle
Vehicle of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension
Topical administration of vehicle of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 1-2 drops in study eye QID, postoperative day 1-14.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution of Anterior Chamber Cells.
Time Frame: Visit 5 (Postoperative day 8)
Participants with complete resolution of anterior chamber cells(ACC). Cells were graded on a 0-4 scale, where 0=no cells and 4=>30 cells
Visit 5 (Postoperative day 8)
Grade 0 Pain
Time Frame: Visit 5 (Postoperative day 8)
Participants with no pain, graded on a 0-5 scale, 0=no pain and 5=severe pain
Visit 5 (Postoperative day 8)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution of Anterior Chamber Cells
Time Frame: Visit 4-7 (postoperative day 3-18)
Participants with complete resolution of anterior chamber cells(ACC). Cells were graded on a 0-4 scale, where 0=no cells and 4=>30 cells
Visit 4-7 (postoperative day 3-18)
Grade 0 Pain
Time Frame: Visits 4-7 (Postoperative days 3-18)
Participants with no pain, graded on a 0-5 scale, 0= no pain and 5=severe pain
Visits 4-7 (Postoperative days 3-18)
Resolution of Anterior Chamber Flare
Time Frame: Visit 4-7 (postoperative day 3-18)
Complete resolution of flare, scored on a scale of 0-4 were 0=none and 4=very severe.
Visit 4-7 (postoperative day 3-18)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Laura Trusso, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 2, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2011

Last Verified

December 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Loteprednol etabonate

3
Subscribe