Topical Lidocaine: Predictors of Response in Peripheral Nerve Injury

August 26, 2011 updated by: Danish Pain Research Center

Evaluation of Predictors of Response for the Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine Patch (Versatis) on Chronic Neuropathic Pain After Peripheral Nerve Injury

The primary purpose is to study the predictive value of preserved nociceptors and large afferent fibers and dynamic mechanical allodynia on the effect of lidocaine patch. The primary outcome measure is the predictive role for these three measures for obtaining a response to lidocaine. A responder is defined as a person with at least a 2-point pain reduction to lidocaine (change in median pain intensity (measured on a 10 point numeric rating scale) of pain from the baseline week to the last week of lidocaine treatment). Secondary effect variable will be efficacy of lidocaine on pain reduction (baseline week versus last week of each treatment) and pain relief (complete, good, moderate, slight, none, or worse) for spontaneous and evoked pain, and effect on ongoing pain, brush evoked allodynia, cold and warm allodynia, and pinprick hyperalgesia evaluated on each visit.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus C, Denmark, 8000
        • Danish Pain Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged 18 or more with neuropathic pain after a peripheral nerve injury with a pain intensity of at least 4 on a 0-10 point numeric rating scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or lactation,
  • allergy to lidocaine,
  • alcohol abuse,
  • psychiatric disorders,
  • skin diseases in the area where the patches are to be applied,
  • treatment with class I antiarrhythmic agents,
  • any treatment within the past one month or concomitantly with Na2+-channel blockers (e.g., mexiletine, phenytoine, propafenone),
  • any topical treatment with capsaicin within the last three months before entering the study, or any other topical treatment in the area of neuropathic pain,
  • concomitant therapy with TENS or acupuncture.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain intensity (measured daily on a 10 point NRS)of spontaneous pain from baseline week to last week of treatment
Time Frame: 4 or 12 weeks
The primary purpose is to study the predictive value of preserved nociceptors and large afferent fibers and dynamic mechanical allodynia on the effect of lidocaine patch. The primary outcome measure is the predictive role for these three measures for obtaining a response to lidocaine. A responder is defined as a person with at least a 2-point pain reduction to lidocaine (change in median pain intensity (measured on a 10 point NRS) of pain from the baseline week to the last week.
4 or 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain relief (complete, good, moderate, slight, none, or worse) for spontaneous and evoked pain
Time Frame: 4 or 12 weeks
4 or 12 weeks
Effect on ongoing pain, brush-evoked allodynia, cold and warm allodynia, and pinprick hyperalgesia
Time Frame: 4 or 12 weeks
4 or 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nanna B. Finnerup, MD, DMSc., Danish Pain Research Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 29, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2011

Last Verified

August 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Topical lidocaine patch

Subscribe