Open-Label Study to Assess Lacosamide Safety as Add-on Therapy for Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Epilepsy

June 20, 2018 updated by: UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.

An Open-Label Pilot Study to Assess the Safety of Oral Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy for Uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy

The purpose is to assess the safety of Lacosamide in subjects with uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) seizures with Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Phase 2

Expanded Access

No longer available outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Alabaster, Alabama, United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
      • Rome, Georgia, United States
    • Idaho
      • Boise, Idaho, United States
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
    • Maine
      • Scarborough, Maine, United States
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States
    • Missouri
      • Chesterfield, Missouri, United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
      • Houston, Texas, United States
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States
    • Washington
      • Renton, Washington, United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a diagnosis of uncontrolled epilepsy with primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures and idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Diagnosis should have been established by an electroencephalogram (EEG) with generalized spike-wave discharges within 5 years of the screening visit
  • Subject has ≥1 PGTC seizure within the 12 weeks prior to the screening visit
  • Subject has a stable dose regimen of 1 to 3 marketed antiepileptic drug(s) (AEDs) with or without additional concurrent stable Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS). The VNS must have been in place for at least 6 months prior to study entry with constant settings for at least 28 days prior to the screening visit and during the Baseline Phase. Benzodiazepines will be counted as an AED

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a history of partial-onset seizures or EEG findings consistent with partial onset seizures
  • Subject has a history of status epilepticus within the 5-year Period prior to Visit 1
  • Subject has a current or previous diagnosis of pseudoseizures, conversion disorders, or other non-epileptic ictal events
  • Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition
  • Subject has any history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Subject is currently taking felbamate
  • Subject has ever taken vigabatrin and has no visual fields examination report available or if results of the examination are abnormal
  • Subject is on a ketogenic diet
  • Subject has a known sodium channelopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lacosamide
Lacosamide is supplied as 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg tablets. Subjects will begin a Dose-Titration Phase of Lacosamide at 100 mg/day (50 mg bid, approx. 12 hours apart, once in the morning and once in the evening) for 1 week. Three (3) weekly increases will follow until the subject reaches a dosage of 200 mg/day, 300 mg/day, or 400 mg/day, as deemed clinically appropriate. The final titration will be followed by a 6-week Maintenance Phase. Subjects who complete the Maintenance Phase have the opportunity to enroll in an open-label extension study; those who do not enroll will begin a 3-week End-of-Study Phase when Lacosamide will be tapered off gradually at a recommended rate of 200 mg/day/week.
Other Names:
  • Vimpat®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Absence Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase
Time Frame: From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)

During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded:

  • Seizure type
  • Seizure frequency

A negative value in change of seizure days with absence seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with absence seizures.

From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)
Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Myoclonic Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase
Time Frame: From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)

During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded:

  • Seizure type
  • Seizure frequency

A negative value in change of seizure days with myoclonic seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with myoclonic seizures.

From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Count of Generalized Spike-wave Discharges on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)
Time Frame: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)
Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with > 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The general spike-wave discharges are calculated per interpretable hours.
From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)
Changes in Count of 3 Hertz (Hz) Spike-wave Discharges (During Waking Hours) on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)
Time Frame: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)
Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with > 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The 3 Hertz (Hz) spike-wave discharges are calculated per awake hours.
From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period
Time Frame: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)
Number of Subjects Withdrawn From the Study Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period
Time Frame: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on Lacosamide

3
Subscribe