Treatment Duration for Abdominal Tuberculosis (RNTCP-DOTS)

July 2, 2015 updated by: Govind K Makharia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

A Multi-centric Study on Treatment of Abdominal Tuberculosis (Intestinal or Peritoneal): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the 6 Months of Cat I Treatment With 9 Months of Cat I Treatment (Extension for 3 Months) in Abdominal Tuberculosis Under the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program

Most of the guidelines on the treatment of tuberculosis suggest that 6 months treatment is sufficient for extrapulmonary tuberculosis except for bone tuberculosis and tubercular meningitis. Despite these recommendations, most physicians treating abdominal tuberculosis use antituberculous therapy for 9 months, sometimes even 12 months without any scientific justification. In a randomized controlled trial, Balasubramaniam et al reported no difference in success rate of 6mo (99%) vs 12 months (94%) antituberculous drugs (conventional strategy) in the treatment of abdominal tuberculosis.

Although Directly Observed Therapy (DOTs) have been proved to be effective in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, lymph nodal tuberculosis, however, there is a lack of data on efficacy of DOTS in other extra-pulmonary disease including abdominal tuberculosis. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish the efficacy of DOTs strategy of antituberculous therapy in the treatment of abdominal tuberculosis.

Therefore, the investigators planned to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial to determine the difference in the recurrence of disease after only observation for three months and three months extension of DOTs in a subset of patients with definite clinical response after 6 months of DOTs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale Most of the guidelines on the treatment of tuberculosis suggest that 6 months treatment is sufficient for extrapulmonary tuberculosis except for bone tuberculosis and tubercular meningitis. Despite these recommendations, most physicians treating abdominal tuberculosis use antituberculous therapy for 9 months, sometimes even 12 months without any scientific justification. In a randomized controlled trial, Balasubramaniam et al reported no difference in success rate of 6mo (99%) vs 12 months (94%) antituberculous drugs (conventional strategy) in the treatment of abdominal tuberculosis.

Although DOTS have been proved to be effective in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, lymph nodal tuberculosis, however, there is a lack of data on efficacy of DOTS in other extra-pulmonary disease including abdominal tuberculosis. The aim of the present study is not to assess the efficacy of DOTs but whether the Cat I regimen for 6 months is effective in the treatment of abdominal tuberculosis. We, therefore planned to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial to determine the difference in the efficacy and recurrence rate in 6months and 9 months of intermittent short course category I regimen under RNTCP.

Hypothesis There may not be a significant difference in the efficacy and recurrence rate of abdominal tuberculosis in those treated for six months vs those treated for 9 months with intermittent short course category I regimen under RNTCP.

Objectives

Primary objectives:

  1. To determine the efficacy of intermittent short course chemotherapy for 6 months under Directly Observed Therapy (Category I under RNTCP) in treatment of abdominal tuberculosis (proportion of patients responding to treatment)
  2. To determine difference in the recurrence of disease between the two randomized groups after only observation for three months and extension of RNTCP Cat I for three months in a subset of patients with definite clinical response after 6 months of DOTs Secondary objective

1. To study the effect of anti-tubercular drugs on the natural history of intestinal stricture due to tuberculosis Outcomes

Outcome measures:

Primary:

  1. Response to treatment (6 months and nine months of RNTCP Cat I treatment) as defined earlier
  2. Recurrence of symptoms of abdominal tuberculosis (intestinal and peritoneal) after 1 year of follow up in those who receive 6 months or 9 months of Cat I treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

197

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110029
        • Dr Govind K Makharia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed patients with Intestinal TB or Peritoneal TB
  • Has not received ATT for Tuberculosis any where in the body during past 5 years
  • Patients having good general health and not too sick.
  • Patients willing and likely to comply with the study procedures and follow up
  • Patients should give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eighteen year is a cut off age for definition of adult and pediatric and adolescent medicine. The dosing of drugs are different in these two age groups. Therefore we plan to include patients of more than 18 years of age with abdominal TB in this study.
  • Intake of ATT during the past 5 years
  • Doubtful diagnosis
  • Crohn's disease
  • Patients with HIV and AIDS may have another systemic opportunistic infections including GI infections like cryptosporidiosis, Microsporidiosis or isosporiasis. There may be an overlap of GI manifestations such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, anemia, fever. Therefore, assessment of response to anti-tuberculosis therapy may be blurred. In order to keep the study group homogenous for comparison, we plan to exclude all those with HIV infection
  • Chronic Liver Disease
  • Associated significant co-morbidities
  • H/O Sensitivity
  • Peritoneal carcinomatosis
  • Patients must not been used investigational agents during the past 6 months
  • Unwilling patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1: Category I treatment for 6 months
Anti-tuberculosis drugs
2H3R3Z3 E3 + 4H3R3
Active Comparator: Arm 2: Category I treatment for 9 months
Anti-tuberculosis drugs,
2H3R3Z3 E3 + 7H3R3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response to treatment (after 6 months and nine months of RNTCP Category I treatment)
Time Frame: 1 year

Intestinal tuberculosis:

Complete response to treatment: Resolution of clinical manifestations, Healing of demonstrable lesions, Microbiological response (Conversion of positive to negative)

Clinical failure: Failure of response to treatment:

Persistence of clinical manifestations Persistence of morphological lesions

Peritoneal tuberculosis: Definition for response Complete response: Complete resolution of ascites within 6 months No response: Persistence of ascites

1 year
Recurrence of symptoms of abdominal tuberculosis (intestinal and peritoneal) after 1 year of follow up in those who receive 6 months or 9 months of Cat I treatment
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr Govind K Makharia, MD, DM, DNB, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 3, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tuberculosis

Clinical Trials on RNTCP Category I treatment for 6 months

3
Subscribe