Dose Response Study of Aerobic Exercise in Older Adults

January 14, 2016 updated by: Jeff Burns, MD

Dose Response Study of Exercise for Age-related Cognitive Changes

This is a randomized, 26-week study of supervised exercise assessing three doses of exercise in sedentary individuals 65 years of age and over with age-related cognitive changes. A total of 100 subjects (n=25 in each of four groups) will be randomized to a non-aerobic control group, 75 minutes, 150 minutes, or 225 minutes a week of moderate intensity aerobic exercise spread over 3 to 5 days a week for 26 weeks. These exercise doses represent 50%, 100%, or 150% of the recommended exercise dose. Participants will be directly supervised during all exercise sessions for the first two months after which direct supervision will occur during at least one session a week. This is intended to provide increased flexibility while also maintaining direct contact with the participant to enhance adherence. Aerobic fitness, physical function, and cognition will be assessed at baseline and 26 weeks to examine the dose-response relationships.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent
  • Age 65 years or older
  • Underactive or sedentary based on the Telephone Assessment of Physical Activity
  • Community dwelling with a caregiver willing to accompany the participant to visits to the screening evaluation. The caregiver must visit with the subject more than five times a week.
  • Nondemented: Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) 0
  • Adequate visual and auditory abilities to perform all aspects of the cognitive and functional assessments
  • Stable doses of medications for at least 30 days prior to screening.
  • Likely to participate in all scheduled evaluations and complete the exercise program over 52 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia
  • CDR > 0
  • Current clinically significant major psychiatric disorder (e.g., Major Depressive Disorder) according to Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV criteria or Geriatric Depression score of 5 or greater.
  • Significant psychiatric symptoms (e.g., hallucinations) that could impair the completion of the study
  • Current clinically-significant systemic illness likely to result in deterioration of the patient's condition or affect the patient's safety during the study
  • History of clinically-evident stroke
  • Clinically-significant infection within the last 30 days
  • Myocardial infarction or symptoms of coronary artery disease (e.g., angina) in the last two-years.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension within the last 6 months
  • History of cancer within the last 5 years (except non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma)
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse as defined by DSM-IV criteria within the last 2 years
  • Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
  • Significant pain or musculoskeletal disorder that would prohibit participation in an exercise program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Nonexercise control group
Participants randomized to the nonexercise control group will be asked to maintain their current level of physical activity during the 26-week active study period. They will perform outcome assessments and receive the same telephone checks as the exercise group at baseline, 26 and 52 weeks. The purpose of including a non-exercise control group is to allow adequate comparisons with the low, medium and high exercise dose groups on changes in cognitive and physiologic outcome measures.
Experimental: Aerobic Exercise Group 1
The 50% group will perform 75 minutes a week of moderate intensity exercise spread over 3 days.
Experimental: Aerobic Exercise Group 2
The 100% group will perform 150 minutes a week of exercise over 3 - 5 days
Experimental: Aerobic Exercise Group 3
The 150% group will perform 225 minutes a week of exercise over 4 - 5 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visuospatial Processing
Time Frame: 26 weeks

Visuospatial Processing is a latent derived variable derived estimated mean.The reported latent means for this trial are created from the well-known neuropsychological tests: Block Design, Stroop Color Reading, Digit Symbol Substitution and Trailmaking Test A.

Latent variables cannot be measured directly but are derived from a theory-driven confirmatory factor analysis in a structural equation model framework. The latent scores are centered around a mean of 0 and standardized so each value represents a fraction of the standard deviation. There are no limits to the scores. Positive number indicate improved performance. Negative numbers indicate worsening performance.

26 weeks
Change in Maximal Oxygen Consumption
Time Frame: 26 weeks
Maximal Oxygen consumption (VO2 max) is the standard, quantitative measure of aerobic fitness. The physiologic range of scores is approximately 3.5 milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute (ml/kg/min) to approximately 90 (ml/kg/min). Higher numbers indicate greater fitness and positive change indicates increasing fitness. Lower number indicate worse fitness
26 weeks
Change in Physical Performance Test
Time Frame: 26 Week
The Physical Performance Test is a 9-item measure of physical function. The range of scores is 0-34. Higher numbers indicate better physical function. Positive change indicates improving function. Negative change indicates decreasing function.
26 Week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Verbal Memory
Time Frame: 26 weeks

Verbal Memory is a latent derived variable derived estimated mean. The reported latent means for this trial are created from the well-known neuropsychological tests: Logical Memory, Delayed Logical Memory, Selective Reminding Task - Free Recall Total, Boston Naming Test.

Latent variables cannot be measured directly but are derived from a theory-driven confirmatory factor analysis in a structural equation model framework. The latent scores are centered around a mean of 0 and standardized so each value represents a fraction of the standard deviation. There are no limits to the scores. Positive number indicate improved performance.Negative numbers indicate worsening performance.

26 weeks
Simple Attention
Time Frame: 26 Weeks

Simple Attention is a latent derived variable derived estimated mean. The reported latent means for this trial are created from the well-known neuropsychological tests: Digit span Forward and Backward, Letter Numbers Sequencing.

Latent variables cannot be measured directly but are derived from a theory-driven confirmatory factor analysis in a structural equation model framework. The latent scores are centered around a mean of 0 and standardized so each value represents a fraction of the standard deviation. There are no limits to the scores. Positive number indicate improved performance. Negative numbers indicate worsening performance.

26 Weeks
Set Maintenance & Shifting
Time Frame: 26 Weeks

Set Maintenance and Switching is a latent derived variable derived estimated mean. The reported latent means for this trial are created from the well-known neuropsychological tests: DKEFS Card Sort, Animal and Vegetable Category Fluency.

Latent variables cannot be measured directly but are derived from a theory-driven confirmatory factor analysis in a structural equation model framework. The latent scores are centered around a mean of 0 and standardized so each value represents a fraction of the standard deviation. There are no limits to the scores. Positive number indicate improved performance. Negative numbers indicate worsening performance.

26 Weeks
Reasoning
Time Frame: 26 Weeks

Reasoning is a latent derived variable derived estimated mean. The reported latent means for this trial are created from the well-known neuropsychological tests:Letter and Word Inductive Reasoning, Matrix Reasoning.

Latent variables cannot be measured directly but are derived from a theory-driven confirmatory factor analysis in a structural equation model framework. The latent scores are centered around a mean of 0 and standardized so each value represents a fraction of the standard deviation. There are no limits to the scores. Positive number indicate improved performance. Negative numbers indicate worsening performance.

26 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Burns, MD, University of Kansas Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on Nonexercise control group

Subscribe