Feasibility Study of Barrier Enhancement for Eczema Prevention (BEEP)

August 4, 2011 updated by: Oregon Health and Science University

Feasibility Study of Barrier Enhancement for Eczema Prevention (BEEP)

The purpose of this protocol is to determine the feasibility of doing larger follow-up studies examining whether emollients used from birth can prevent eczema in high-risk babies and to help investigators find out if emollients (moisturizing skin creams) used from birth can prevent eczema in high-risk babies. Hypothesis: Enhancing the skin barrier from birth using emollients will prevent or delay the onset of eczema, especially in predisposed infants.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 minute to 6 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant must have a parent or sibling with a history of at least one of the following: eczema, allergic rhinitis or asthma
  2. Infant in overall good health
  3. Mother between the ages of 16 and 45 years of age at delivery; infant from birth thru 6 months of age
  4. Capable of giving informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Preterm birth defined as birth prior to 37 weeks gestation
  2. Major congenital anomaly
  3. Hydrops fetalis
  4. Significant dermatitis at birth not including seborrheic dermatitis ("cradle cap")
  5. Any immunodeficiency disorder or severe genetic skin disorder
  6. Any other serious condition that would make the use of emollients inadvisable
  7. Any other major medical problems that the investigator deems may increase the risk of adverse events with the intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention (moisturizer group)
One group will be instructed to use a choice of 3 FDA-approved moisturizers and soap substitutes on their newborn infants.
One group will be instructed to use FDA-approved moisturizers and soap substitutes on their newborn infants.
Other Names:
  • Moisturizers
One group will be instructed to use FDA-approved moisturizers and soap substitutes on their newborn infants.
One group will be instructed to use FDA-approved moisturizers and soap substitutes on their newborn infants.
Active Comparator: Control group (no moisturizers)
This group will be asked NOT to use any skin moisturizers and use only soap substitutes on their infants.
This group will be asked NOT to use any skin moisturizers and use only soap substitutes on their infants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of families willing to be randomized.
Time Frame: 6 months
Determine proportion of families willing to be randomized in order to design larger study in the future.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of families eligible for the trial, willing to participate
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Proportion of families who found the interventions acceptable
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Reported adherence with intervention
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Proportion of families for whom the blinding of the assessor to the allocation ostatus was not compromised
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Amount of contamination as a result of increased awareness in the control group
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Percentage of missing data and early withdrawal rates
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Incidence of emollient-related adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Incidence of eczema at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Age at onset of eczema
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Filaggrin mutation status
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric L. Simpson, M.D., M.C.R., Oregon Health and Science University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 14, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 5, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2011

Last Verified

June 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BEEP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eczema

Clinical Trials on Sunflower oil

Subscribe