Efficacy of Ferric Carboxymaltose With or Without EPO Reducing Red-cell Transfusion Packs in Hip Fracture Perioperative Period (PAHFRAC)

Multicenter Double-bind Randomized Trial of Ferric Carboxymaltose With or Without Erythropoietin for the Prevention of Red-cell Transfusion in Hip Fracture Perioperative Period.

In order to evaluate the efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose + erythropoietin versus ferric carboxymaltose versus placebo in reducing the percentage of patients who receive red-cell transfusion in the perioperative period of hip fracture, a multicenter, randomized, parallel groups, double-blind clinical trial in adult patients admitted for osteoporotic hip fracture is designed. Required sample size is of 87 patients per arm (87x3 = 261). Primary efficacy variable is the percentage of patients who receive red-cell transfusion during hospitalization; secondary end-points: average red-cell packs per patient,haemoglobin at 24 h and 72h after the intervention, at the time of hospital discharge and 60 days after hospital discharge, hospital stay and mortality during hospital-stay and 60 days afterwards. Adverse clinical events and side effects are assessed as safety variables. In addition health related quality of life will be measured at inclusion and after 60 days. A cost-efficacy analysis (by means of incremental cost-efficacy method using as a primary endpoint each patient not requiring transfusion, and as secondary end-point every patient who survived the index admission is performed). The investigators would like to demonstrate a double benefits: optimizing precious resource such as blood products and reducing complications arising from their use.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Three arms of treatments: A: ferric carboxymaltose and erythropoietin, B: ferric carboxymaltose and placebo, arm C: two placebos. Primary objective:reduction of red-cell packs needed for elderly patients with osteoporotic hip fracture which requires surgical intervention in the perioperative period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

303

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Albacete, Spain, 02006
        • Hospital Universitario de Albacete
      • Huelva, Spain, 21080
        • Hospital Infanta Elena
      • Lugo, Spain, 27004
        • Hospital Lucus Augusti
      • Seville, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
      • Valladolid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega
    • Alicante
      • Elche, Alicante, Spain
        • Hospital General Universitario de Elche
      • Orihuela, Alicante, Spain, 03314
        • Hospital de La Vega Baja
    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, 08915
        • Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
      • Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
        • Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
    • España
      • Sevilla, España, Spain, 41013
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
    • Guipúzcoa
      • San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
        • Hospital Donostia
    • Malaga
      • Ronda, Malaga, Spain, 29400
        • Hospital de la Serranía de Ronda
    • Málaga
      • Vélez-Málaga, Málaga, Spain
        • Hospital Comarcal de la Axarquia
    • Sevilla
      • Bormujos, Sevilla, Spain, 41930
        • Hospital San Juan de Dios del Aljarafe

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 65 years and older.
  • Osteoporotic hip fracture which require surgical intervention
  • Haemoglobin levels between 90-120 g/L
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bone marrow diseases which could interfere in the erythropoietic process (acute or chronic myelodysplastic syndromes or myeloproliferative diseases, and/or infiltration of the bone marrow due to solid or lymphatic neoplasms)
  • Blood coagulation diseases or currently treated with oral anticoagulants and/or heparin at therapeutic doses.
  • Documented allergy and/or previous intolerance and/or contraindication of erythropoietin use and/or intravenous iron.
  • Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and/or another demonstrated origin of inflammatory anemia and/or not controlled arterial hypertension.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Two placebos: placebo for ferric carboxymaltose and placebo for erythropoietin

Placebo for ferric carboxymaltose: 250 mL normal saline for intravenous administration.

Placebo for erythropoietin: 1 mL normal saline for subcutaneous injection.

Experimental: FE
Ferric carboxymaltose and placebo for erythropoietin

Ferinject®: Ferric carboxymaltose: 2 vials of 10 mL containing each 500 mg iron, diluted in 250 mL normal saline for injection. Study drug to be administered by infusion immediately after preparation.

Placebo for erythropoietin: 1 mL normal saline for subcutaneous injection.

Other Names:
  • Intravenous iron
Experimental: EPOFE
Ferric carboxymaltose and erythropoietin

Ferinject®: Ferric carboxymaltose: 2 vials of 10 mL containing each 500 mg iron, diluted in 250 mL normal saline for injection. Study drug to be administered by infusion immediately after preparation.

Placebo for erythropoietin: 1 mL normal saline for subcutaneous injection.

Other Names:
  • Intravenous iron
Erythropoetin: 40,000 units subcutaneous (unique dose).
Other Names:
  • EPO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduce red-cell transfusion packs
Time Frame: 60 days after hospital discharge
percentage of patients who receive red-cell transfusion during hospitalization
60 days after hospital discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average red-cell packs per patient
Time Frame: end of study
end of study
Haemoglobin level
Time Frame: 24 h and 72h after the intervention, at the time of hospital discharge and 60 days after hospital discharge
24 h and 72h after the intervention, at the time of hospital discharge and 60 days after hospital discharge
Number of hospitalization days
Time Frame: end of study
number of days inhospital
end of study
Death rate with all causes mortality
Time Frame: end of study
end of study
Adverse Events
Time Frame: end of study
adverse clinical events, side effects, Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction(SUSAR)
end of study
Quality of life
Time Frame: end of study
health related quality of life
end of study
cost-efficacy analysis
Time Frame: end of study
means of incremental cost-efficacy method (using as a primary endpoint each patient not requiring transfusion, and as secondary end-point every patient who survived the index admission)
end of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Máximo Bernabeu-Wittel, MD, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio. Sevilla

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe