Prioritising and Optimising Multi-medication in Multimorbidity (PRIMUM)

October 29, 2017 updated by: Christiane Muth, Goethe University

Prioritising and Optimising Multiple Medications in Elderly Multimorbid Patients in General Practice. - A Pragmatic Cluster-randomised Controlled Trial.

Objective: To investigate whether the complex intervention will improve the appropriateness of prescriptions in elderly multi-morbid patients with multi-medication in general practices.

Study hypothesis: The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the complex intervention will improve the appropriateness of prescriptions compared to usual care. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) score from baseline (T0) to 6 months after baseline (T1), i.e. the difference MAI T1-T0.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Key elements (1 to 4) of the complex intervention:

  1. Basic assessment of medicines that were actually taken (brown bag review) by a general practice based health care assistant (HCA) and
  2. Checklist-based (MediMoL - Medication-Monitoring-List) pre-consultation interview on problems relating to medicines (technical handling, potential adverse drug reactions) and patient's therapeutic aims by HCA provides structured information in the Medication-Monitoring-List (MediMoL) for the general practitioner (GP) and enables patients to discuss their problems with the GP.
  3. GP uses a computerized decision support system (pharmaceutical information system, AiD+) to optimize medication (reducing number of inappropriate prescriptions, e.g. pharmaceutical interactions, renal dose adjustments, duplicate prescriptions) and
  4. prioritizes medication in the physician-patient consultation taking into consideration patient's preferences.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

505

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hesse
      • Frankfurt / Main, Hesse, Germany, D-60590
        • Institute for General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt / Main, Germany

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 60 years old of both sexes
  • at least three chronic diseases affecting two or more organ systems, which require pharmaceutical treatment
  • at least five long-term prescriptions with systemic effects
  • health care provided by GP (at least one contact in most recent quarter)
  • patient is legally competent to sign any documents
  • ability to understand and participate in trial of own free will, to fill out questionnaires and participate in telephone interviews
  • written informed consent to participate in trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diseases cause life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • abuse of alcohol or illegal drugs and visible clinical signs or symptoms thereof
  • cognitive impairment that prevents trial participation (MMSE < 26)
  • emotional stress that prevents trial participation
  • participation in a clinical trial within the last 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control

Usual care in accordance with recommended standard#

#Recommended standard: clinical practice guideline "Geriatrie" of the guideline group of Hesse (part 1 and 2)

Experimental: Intervention arm

Intervention: Healthcare assistant (HCA) and computer assisted optimization of multi-medication (complex intervention) in accordance with recommended standard#

#Recommended standard: clinical practice guideline "Geriatrie" of the guideline group of Hesse (part 1 and 2)

Healthcare assistant (HCA) and computer assisted optimization of multi-medication (complex intervention) in accordance with recommended standard#

#Recommended standard: clinical practice guideline "Geriatrie" of the guideline group of Hesse (part 1 and 2)

Other Names:
  • Intervention arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI)-Score
Time Frame: 6 months from baseline
Difference in Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI)-Score 6 months from baseline minus baseline (MAI T1-T0)
6 months from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MAI-Score
Time Frame: 9 months from baseline
Difference in Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI)-Score 9 months from baseline minus baseline (MAI T1-T0)
9 months from baseline
Generic health related quality of life: EQ-5D
Time Frame: 6 months from baseline
Change in generic health related quality of life measured as the difference in the EQ-5D-Score 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0)
6 months from baseline
Generic health related quality of life: EQ-5D
Time Frame: 9 months
Change in generic health related quality of life measured as the difference in the EQ-5D-Score 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)
9 months
Functional disability: Vulnerable Elderly Survey (VES-13)
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in functional disability measured as the difference in the VES-13-Score 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0)
6 months
Functional disability: Vulnerable Elderly Survey (VES-13)
Time Frame: 9 months
Change in functional disability measured as the difference in the VES-13-Score 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)
9 months
Change in all cause hospitalisation
Time Frame: 6 months and 9 months
6 months and 9 months
"Observed" adherence
Time Frame: 6 months from baseline and 9 months from baseline
Change in observed adherence measured as the difference between intake (patient's interview) and prescribed medication (CRF reported by physician's) 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0) and 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)
6 months from baseline and 9 months from baseline
Self-reported adherence (Morisky)
Time Frame: 6 and 9 months from baseline
Change in self-reported adherence measured as the difference in the Morisky-Score 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0) and 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)
6 and 9 months from baseline
Future life expectancy / years of desired life
Time Frame: 6 and 9 months from baseline
Change in perceived future life expectancy reflects concepts of will to life or years of desired life [YDL] measured as the difference of the three items future expectation / expected lifetime duration / desired lifetime duration in the interval 6 months
6 and 9 months from baseline
medication complexity
Time Frame: 6 and 9 months from baseline

Change in complexity of medication measured as the difference 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0) and 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)

  • Total number of prescriptions
  • Number of single doses / day
  • Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI)
6 and 9 months from baseline
Beliefs about Medicines Questionaire (BMQ)
Time Frame: 6 and 9 months from baseline
Change in health and illness beliefs and attitudes measured as the difference in the Beliefs about Medicines Questionaire (BMQ) score 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0) and 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)
6 and 9 months from baseline
Severity of chronic pain
Time Frame: 6 and 9 months from baseline
Change in severity of chronic pain measured as the difference in Characteristic Pain Intensity score, the Disability Score, in Disability Points and the resulting Grades of chronic pain severity in accordance with M. von Korff, J. Ormel et al. the interval 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0) and 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)
6 and 9 months from baseline
Satisfaction with shared decision making (Man Son Hing scale, MSH)
Time Frame: 6 and 9 months from baseline
Change in satisfaction with shared decision making measured as the difference in the Man Son Hing scale (MSH) interval 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0) and 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)
6 and 9 months from baseline
Cognitive dysfunction in verbal fluency
Time Frame: 6 and 9 months from baseline
Change in cognitive (dys)function measured as the difference in the Verbal Fluency Test (VFT) interval 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0) and 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)
6 and 9 months from baseline
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 6 and 9 months from baseline
Change in depressive symptoms measured as the difference in the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) interval 6 months from baseline minus baseline (T1-T0) and 9 months from baseline minus baseline (T2-T0)
6 and 9 months from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christiane Muth, MD, MPH, Institute for General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt / Main

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 29, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

February 29, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 28, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Disease

Clinical Trials on Optimization strategy (complex intervention)

Subscribe