Safety and Efficacy Study of Polydioxanone (PDS) Plates in Rhinoplasty

October 12, 2020 updated by: Steven H. Dayan, DeNova Research

An Open-Label, Randomized, 2-Arm Parallel Study Comparing the Efficacy, Ease of Use, and Safety of PDS Plated Cartilagenous Grafting Versus Non-Plated Cartilagenous Grafting as Performed Through Endonasal Rhinoplasty

The purpose of this study is to determine efficacy, safety, and ease of cartilaginous grafting using polydioxanone (PDS) plates in comparison to non-plated cartilaginous grafts as performed through an endonasal rhinoplasty approach in patients requiring a caudal septal extension (CSE) graft.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • DeNova Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females between 18 and 65 years of age.
  • Subjects requesting primary or secondary rhinoplasty and requiring a CSE graft performed through an endonasal approach.
  • Subjects willing to undergo PDS plating.
  • Subjects with either ear conchal or septal cartilage available for grafting purposes.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with protocol requirements, including returning for follow-up visits and abstaining from exclusionary procedures for the duration of the study.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with the PI's standard preoperative and postoperative rhinoplasty instructions.
  • Subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at Visit 1 and be willing able to use an acceptable method of birth control (e.g., barrier methods used with a spermicidal agent, hormonal methods, IUD, surgical sterilization, abstinence) during the study. Women will not be considered of childbearing potential if one of the following is documented on the medical history:
  • postmenopausal for at least 12 months prior to study drug administration
  • without a uterus and/or both ovaries
  • has had a bilateral tubal ligation for at least 6 months prior to study drug administration.
  • absence of an other physical condition according to the PI's discretion
  • Willingness and ability to provide written photo consent and adherence to photography procedures (i.e., removal of jewelry and makeup).
  • Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent prior to performance of any study related procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are pregnant, nursing, planning to become pregnant, and/or not using a reliable form of birth control.
  • Subjects with a significant systemic illness or illness localized to the areas of treatment.
  • Subjects with previous history of nasal implants.
  • Subjects with previous or current history of nasal infections.
  • Subjects who have history of blood thinners (aspirin, ibuprofen, naprosyn, herbal supplements, Vitamin E) within the two weeks prior to surgery.
  • Subjects who have smoked within the two weeks prior to surgery.
  • Subjects who have had alcohol or illicit drugs one week prior to surgery.
  • Subjects who have eaten or drank anything after midnight the night prior to surgery.
  • Subjects with current history of chronic drug or alcohol abuse.
  • History of autoimmune disease.
  • Concurrent therapy that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of the study medication.
  • Subjects who anticipate the need for surgery, other than the study procedure, or overnight hospitalization during the study.
  • Subjects who, in the Investigator's opinion, have a history of poor cooperation, non compliance with medical treatment or unreliability.
  • Enrollment in any active study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Polydioxanone (PDS) plates
15 subjects will be randomized to receive a caudal septal extension graft using a PDS plated cartilagenous graft
0.5 mm PDS Flexible Plate made of poly-p-dioxanone, an aliphatic polyester which is manufactured by polymerization of the monomer p-dioxanone. Polydioxanone is a resorbable material degraded by hydrolysis and has been successfully used for bone discontinuities and septal reconstruction.
The caudal septal extension (CSE) graft is a common method used to alter tip projection, alar-columellar relationship, and nasolabial angle.5 However, it can be difficult to stabilize and straighten the CSE graft, especially when performed through an endonasal approach. Use of a polydioxanone plate would provide a scaffolding for the CSE graft and could allow for a technically easier and more predictable surgical procedure.
Other: Non-plated cartilagenous graft
15 subjects will be randomized to receive a cartilagenous caudal septal extension fgraft
The caudal septal extension (CSE) graft is a common method used to alter tip projection, alar-columellar relationship, and nasolabial angle.5 However, it can be difficult to stabilize and straighten the CSE graft, especially when performed through an endonasal approach. Use of a polydioxanone plate would provide a scaffolding for the CSE graft and could allow for a technically easier and more predictable surgical procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Live Assessment of Satisfaction With the Grafts
Time Frame: 12 months post operative

Efficacy will be determined by a live assessment of satisfaction with the grafts at 12 months using a four-point categorical satisfaction scale ((4) unsatisfied, (3) satisfied, (2) very satisfied, (1) highly satisfied).

Scores closer to 1 indicate a more favorable outcome

12 months post operative
Assessment of Tip Projection
Time Frame: 12 months Post opeartive

Tip projection will be measured using standardized photography preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively using Goode's Ratio.

The ratio of the line from the alar crease to the nasal tip to the nasion to the nasal tip should be 0.55. If it is more than that the nose is over projected, if it is under that ratio the nose is under projected.

12 months Post opeartive
Non-treating Blinded Evaluator Satisfaction Assessment
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months; Month 12 reported

A non-treating blinded evaluator will assess satisfaction with a four-point categorical satisfaction scale ((4) - unsatisfied, (3) - satisfied, (2) - very satisfied, (1) - highly satisfied) of subject's grafts using photographs from baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months and will consist of a blinded evaluation in which the physician is aware of the type of graft, but unaware of plating status or the specific grafting site.

Scores closer to 1 indicate a more favorable outcome

Assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months; Month 12 reported
Ease of Use
Time Frame: 1 hour following surgery
Ease of use will be determined by the treating investigator using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to demonstrate technical ease with a score of 0 mm being easy and a scale of 100 mm being extremely difficult.
1 hour following surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Infection, Rejection, and Extrusion of the Graft at 1 Week, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, and 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months post surgery
Safety will be determined by rate of infection, rejection, and extrusion of the graft at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
12 months post surgery
Intraoperative Duration
Time Frame: During surgery (up to 3 hours)
The intraoperative duration of the grafting procedure will be measured by an assistant using a stopwatch to record the time it takes to harvest, shape, and satisfactorily secure the graft.
During surgery (up to 3 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 24, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 19, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 19, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PDS-END-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhinoplasty

Clinical Trials on Polydioxanone (PDS) plates

3
Subscribe