Duramesh™ vs Polydioxanone Suture for Laparotomy Closure (MOMENTUM RCT)

April 12, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Duramesh™ With Polydioxanone Suture for Laparotomy Closure

This study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a Duramesh closure as compared to a polydioxanone closure for early surgical site events (SSE) (< 1 month), and Duramesh superiority to polydioxanone for the development of incisional hernia by 1 year for a laparotomy closure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This clinical investigation is designed to compare laparotomy closure with Duramesh to closure using PDS. The primary outcome is SSE that occurs within 1 month after surgery. Secondary outcomes that will be studied include device performance and technical success of the index-procedure, hernia occurrence/recurrence noted at 12 months after surgery, SSE and re-interventions that occur within 12 months of surgery, pain, implant palpability/sensation, surgeon and patient satisfaction, and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

230

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Oost-Vlaanderen
      • Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • UZ Gent
        • Contact:
          • Frederik Berrevoet, Prof. Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or greater
  • Abdominal laparotomy 5 cm in length or greater, either midline or non-midline
  • Isolated ostomy site takedown with or without parastomal hernia
  • Patient accepts participation and gives informed consent
  • Patient and investigator signed and dated the informed consent form prior to the index-procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of clinically recognized hernia at laparotomy site (parastomal hernia noted at time of ostomy site takedown is not an exclusion criterion. Subclinical incidental small hernia < 1 cm in greatest dimension found at the time of a laparotomy is not an automatic exclusion criterion)
  • Prior hernia repair at laparotomy site
  • Use of planar mesh in addition to sutures for closure
  • CDC IV dirty or infected wound that causes the surgeon to leave the abdominal wall or skin incision open
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year
  • Patient is unable / unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Patient is unable to comply with the protocol or proposed follow-up visits
  • Patient is enrolled in another abdominal wall study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Duramesh

Laparotomy closure is associated with the occurrence of Surgical Site Events (SSEs) such as wound dehiscence and incisional hernias. Abdominal wall closure can also cause pain and discomfort, or can lead to intestinal obstruction.

Standard sutures can cut through otherwise intact tissue due to the presence of a sharp leading edge leading to repair failure. Meshes distribute forces and allow for tissue ingrowth. Duramesh combines the desirable principles of a mesh repair with the placement precision of a suture. It is the world's first device that both approximates tissue and allows ingrowth for a strong early repair.

Consequently, the expected clinical benefit is the reduced occurrence of Surgical Site Events such as incisional hernias. Additional benefits may include reduced pain and improved quality of life due to durable closure of the abdominal wall with Duramesh. This will be evaluated in this randomized study.

Size 1 Duramesh is used in this RCT. Duramesh is CE-marked.

Laparotomy closure with Duramesh
Other: Standard suture
2-0, 0, or Number 1 polydioxanone suture (PDS) is used as comparator.
Laparotomy closure with standard PDS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary outcome is SSE that occurs within 1 month after surgery.
Time Frame: 1 month

This study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a Duramesh closure as compared to a polydioxanone closure for early surgical site events (SSE) (< 1 month).

SSE include: Seroma, Hematoma, Soft tissue breakdown, Fascial dehiscence, Cellulitis, Suture granuloma, Chronic draining sinus, Enterocutaneous fistula, Superficial, deep and organ/space infections, Other

1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SSE within the first 12 months after repair.
Time Frame: 12 months
SSE include: Surgical incision wound (this does NOT include a less than 5 mm scar-related superficial wound due to scar instability), Chronic draining sinus, Enterocutaneous fistula, Persistent seroma or fluid collection between the abdominal wall incision and the skin but not draining, Other
12 months
Clinical hernia occurrence/recurrence within 12 months after repair.
Time Frame: 12 months
This study is intended to demonstrate Duramesh superiority to polydioxanone for the development of incisional hernia by 1 year for a laparotomy closure.
12 months
Return to the operating room (re-interventions) within 12 months for device related issue.
Time Frame: 12 months
Re-interventions are defined as: All re-interventions relating to abdominal wall closure complications or abdominal re-exploration.
12 months
Surgeon satisfaction at index-procedure using the 5-point smiley face scale.
Time Frame: Procedure
Procedure
Surgeon satisfaction at 1-month follow-up using the 5-point smiley face scale.
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Technical success of index-procedure.
Time Frame: Procedure
Technical success is defined as successful abdominal wall closure without unexpected difficulties.
Procedure
Device performance using the 5-point smiley face scale.
Time Frame: Procedure
Procedure
Pain of the surgical incision using 11 point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) at 1-month follow-up.
Time Frame: 1 month
The pain NRS is a single 11-point numeric scale with 0 representing one pain extreme (e.g., "no pain") and 10 representing the other pain extreme (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" and "worst pain imaginable"). The NRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondents selects a whole number (0 to 10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of their pain. Pain will be scored in rest and with activity. Activity is defined as activity of daily living, e.g. walking, driving, getting into a car, setting the dinner table, doing the laundry, etc.
1 month
Pain of the surgical incision using 11 point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) at 12-months follow-up.
Time Frame: 12 months
The pain NRS is a single 11-point numeric scale with 0 representing one pain extreme (e.g., "no pain") and 10 representing the other pain extreme (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" and "worst pain imaginable"). The NRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondents selects a whole number (0 to 10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of their pain. Pain will be scored in rest and with activity. Activity is defined as activity of daily living, e.g. walking, driving, getting into a car, setting the dinner table, doing the laundry, etc.
12 months
Palpability/sensation of suture used for the repair at 12-months follow-up.
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment whether the patient can feel the suture.
12 months
Quality of life using Short Form 12 (SF-12) health survey at 12-months follow-up.
Time Frame: 12 months
The SF-12 Health Survey is a 12-item, patient-reported survey of patient health.
12 months
Patient satisfaction at 1-month follow-up 5-point smiley face scale.
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Patient satisfaction at 12-months follow-up 5-point smiley face scale.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MOMENTUM RCT ONZ-2022-0507

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparotomy Closure After Abdominal Surgery

Clinical Trials on Duramesh

3
Subscribe