Phase III Confirmatory Study of DE-089 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Dry Eye

August 8, 2014 updated by: Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Double-masked Comparison Study of DE-089 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Dry Eye (Multi-center Study, in Comparison to 0.1% Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution) - Phase III Confirmatory Study -

To investigate that the efficacy of 3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution (one drop at a time, 6 times daily, 4 weeks topical administration), in comparison to 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution (0.1% HA) (one drop at a time, 6 times daily, 4 weeks topical administration), is at least non-inferior in the change in fluorescein staining score, and is superior in the change in Rose bengal score, in a multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group comparison study. Safety profile will likewise be compared.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

332

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Santen study sites

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Those who show:

    • Keratoconjunctival disorder confirmed with vital dye staining
    • Abnormal Schirmer score results

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eye disease that needs therapy other than that for dry eye
  • Those who need to wear contact lenses during the clinical study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3% DE-089
Drug: 3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution
Active Comparator: 0.1% HA
Drug: 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Fluorescein Staining Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 4-week (discontinued (LOCF))

Fluorescein staining was scored according to the protocol by Shimmura et al. The cornea was divided into 3 equal zones: upper, middle, and lower. Each zone had a staining score ranging between 0 and 3 points, with minimum and maximum total staining scores ranging between 0 and 9 points. 0 is better.

The degree of staining with Fluorescein dyes was scored as follows: 0 = no staining, 1= staining of less than half of the area, 2= staining of more than half of the area, 3= staining in the whole area.
Baseline and 4-week (discontinued (LOCF))
Mean Change in Rose Bengal Staining Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 4-week (discontinued (LOCF))

Rose bengal staining were scored according to the protocol by Shimmura et al. The ocular surface was divided into 5 zones: nasal and temporal conjunctival, and upper, middle, and lower corneal areas. A staining score between 0 and 3 points was used in each zone, with the minimum and maximum total staining scores ranging between 0 and 15 points.0 is better.

The degree of staining with Rose bengal dyes was scored as follows: 0 = no staining, 1= staining of less than half of the area, 2= staining of more than half of the area, 3= staining in the whole area.
Baseline and 4-week (discontinued (LOCF))

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2014

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00890602

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on 3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Morocco

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe