To Evaluate the Safety of Long-term Use of HPN-100 in the Management of Urea Cycle Disorders (UCDs)

April 4, 2018 updated by: Horizon Therapeutics, LLC

Long Term Use of HPN-100 in Urea Cycle Disorders

This was an open-label, long-term safety study of HPN-100 (RAVICTI; glycerol phenylbutyrate) in participants with a urea cycle disorder (UCD) who completed the safety extensions of HPN-100-005 (NCT00947544; HPN-100-005SE), HPN-100-006 (NCT00947297; HPN-100-007), or HPN-100-012 (NCT01347073; HPN-100-012SE). The initial studies were 1- to 2-week crossover studies, and their associated safety extensions were 12-month, open-label studies. All participants who completed the initial studies were eligible to enroll in the associated safety extension studies, and new participants were also permitted to enroll directly into the safety extension studies.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The duration of treatment in this study was open-ended. Participants were to return for clinic visits as prescribed by the investigator, and were to be seen at a minimum of every 6 months. At each clinic visit, participants were queried about any adverse events (AEs) or hyperammonemic crises (HACs) that occurred since the last visit. Physical and neurological examinations were performed, and blood samples were collected for the analysis of ammonia, amino acid panels, and routine clinical laboratory safety tests. Participants underwent neuropsychological testing at baseline, every 12 months thereafter, and at the final study visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • The Hospital for Sick Children
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Pediatrics/Genetics
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University School of Medicine
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Denver Children's Hospital
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Children's National Medical Center
    • Maine
      • Portland, Maine, United States, 04102
        • Maine Medical Center
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55454
        • University Of Minnesota Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Case Medical Center
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
        • Children's Hospital of Pittsburg of UPMC
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • University of Utah
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's Hospital
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 months and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female subjects who completed Studies HPN-100-005SE, HPN-100-007, or HPN-100-012SE
  • Signed informed consent by participant and/or participant's legally authorized representative
  • Negative pregnancy test for all females of childbearing potential

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any clinical or laboratory abnormality or medical condition that, at the discretion of the investigator, may have put the participant at increased risk when participating
  • Known hypersensitivity to PAA (phenylacetate) or PBA (phenylbutyrate).
  • Liver transplant, including hepatocellular transplant
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding or lactating females

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HPN-100
Participants continued HPN-100 treatment after completion of HPN-100-005SE, HPN-100-007, or HPN-100-012SE.
Participants received individualized doses of HPN-100 orally, three times daily (TID) with meals. The initial dose was the same dose administered at the end of the HPN-100-005SE, HPN-100-007, or HPN-100-012SE studies. Dose adjustments (including frequency adjustments) were permitted as judged clinically appropriate by the investigator based on assessment of ammonia-scavenging needs (e.g., severity of the UCD defect, dietary protein intake, and urinary phenylacetylglutamine [PAGN] excretion). The maximum recommended dose of HPN-100 in participants weighing less than 20 kg was 0.53 mL/kg/day (equivalent to 600 mg/kg/day of NaPBA), and was 11.48 mL/m²/day in heavier subjects (equivalent to 13g/m²/day of NaPBA). The maximum HPN-100 dose recommended per protocol was 17.4 mL/day, which is equivalent to 20 g/day of NaPBA.
Other Names:
  • GT4P, Glyceryl tri-(4-phenylbutyrate), RAVICTI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event
Time Frame: From the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 months
Safety was assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs). An AE/adverse experience was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. For additional information regarding adverse events, please see the safety section of the record.
From the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Normalized Blood Ammonia Levels
Time Frame: From baseline through the end of the study, up to 66 months
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of plasma ammonia concentrations at baseline, at least every 6 months, at all unscheduled visits, and at the end of study participation. Ammonia level data were obtained from different local laboratories and each laboratory may have used a slightly different normal reference range. Therefore, the ammonia level data were normalized to a standard laboratory reference range before performing any analysis of ammonia data.
From baseline through the end of the study, up to 66 months
Number of Hyperammonemic Crises
Time Frame: From the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 months
An hyperammonemic crisis (HAC) was defined as clinical symptoms associated with a venous ammonia concentration of ≥100 μmol/L.
From the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 months
Causes of Hyperammonemic Crises
Time Frame: From the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 months
An hyperammonemic crisis (HAC) was defined as clinical symptoms associated with a venous ammonia concentration of ≥100 μmol/L. Peak observed ammonia concentrations during an HAC, precipitating factors, and symptoms recorded as suggestive to hyperammonemia were documented. There can be multiple contributing factors to an hyperammonemic crisis; in some cases several causes were identified.
From the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 months
Mean Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) was administered to adults and pediatric participants who were at least 6 years of age. It was used to estimate general intellectual ability (IQ) based on the vocabulary and matrix reasoning subtests. The vocabulary subtest included 4 images and 38 verbal items. In the matrix reasoning subtest, the participant viewed 35 incomplete grid patterns and was asked to complete the pattern using responses from 5 possible choices. The number of correct responses for each of the subtests was converted to a T-score using the WASI assessment manual; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Raw scores for the 2 subtests were summed, and converted to a standard score (mean of 100 with SD of 15) for the general IQ score for adults and to a T-score for children in accordance with the WASI manual. Higher scores indicate a higher level of intelligence.
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
Mean Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Problems Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a widely-used method of identifying problem behavior. Two versions of the CBCL were used in this study; the assessment for children 6-18 years of age was used for participants ≥6 years of age, and the assessment for children 1.5-5 years of age was used for those who were at least 5 years old but <6 years of age. Parents/caregivers answered questions (120 and 100 questions, respectively, for the older and younger populations) using a 3-point Likert scale (0= not true; 1= somewhat or sometimes true; 2 =very true or often true). Using a computer program, responses to similar questions were grouped together into 20 domains (e.g., activities, social, school, etc.), and domain response scores were converted to T-scores and percentiles. A mean score of 50 is average, with a standard deviation of 10 points. Higher scores indicate greater problems. The total problems score is the sum of all of the problem items.
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
Mean Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is designed to assess executive functioning in children and adolescents ages 5 to 18 years of age. Parents/caregivers answered 86 questions on a 3-point scale (never, sometimes, often). Similar questions were grouped together into 8 scales; these scales were summed to produce 2 index measures and a global executive composite score. Raw scores for the indices/scales and composite score were converted to T-scores with corresponding 90% confidence intervals using computer software. Higher T-scores indicate a higher level of dysfunction.
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
Mean California Verbal Learning Test Scores: List A Total 1-5 T-Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II) assesses recall and recognition of word lists over several immediate- and delayed-memory trials. In the learning phase, adult participants were presented a list of 16 words (List A; 4 words each in 4 categories [e.g., fruit, toys, etc.]) for 5 trials, but words from the same category were never presented consecutively. An interference list (List B) of 16 different words was then presented for 1 trial. Short-and long-delay recalls for List A, yes/no recognition trials of List A, and a forced-choice recognition trial of List A was also administered. The total score for the 5 immediate-recall trials was converted to a T-score. Lower T-scores reflect worse performance.
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
Mean California Verbal Learning Test Scores: Short and Long Delay Free Recall, Short and Long Delay Cued Recall, CVLT-II-Learning Slope, and Total Word Recognition Discrimination
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II) assesses recall and recognition of word lists over several immediate- and delayed-memory trials. In the learning phase, adult participants were presented a list of 16 words (List A; 4 words each in 4 categories [e.g., fruit, toys, etc.]) for 5 trials, but words from the same category were never presented consecutively. An interference list (List B) of 16 different words was then presented for 1 trial. Short-and long-delay recalls for List A, yes/no recognition trials of List A, and a forced-choice recognition trial of List A was also administered. The scores for the learning slope, the short- and long-delay scores and total word recognition discrimination scores were converted to Z-scores by computer software. The CVLT-II Z-score has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Negative scores indicate below-average performance.
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Colleen Canavan, BS, Horizon Therapeutics, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urea Cycle Disorders

Clinical Trials on HPN-100

3
Subscribe