Long-Term Non-Interventional Latanoprost Study (LYNX)

A Prospective, Non-interventional, Longitudinal Cohort Study To Evaluate The Long-term Safety Of Latanoprost Treatment In Pediatric Populations

This is a non-interventional, prospective, longitudinal cohort study. A total of 150 pediatric subjects with glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure, including 75 latanoprost-treated subjects and 75 non-topical prostaglandin analogue treated subjects, will be enrolled from ophthalmic hospital clinics and academic ophthalmic centers. As a non-interventional study, the study subjects' continued use of latanoprost and assessments of ocular events will be obtained through the routine medical follow-up with treating ophthalmologists or other designated members of the medical care team.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At least 40 subjects in each of the following age groups: 1-<5 years and 5-<18 years. No minimum required numbers in the <1 year age group.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

175

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Edegem, Belgium, 2650
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Dienst Oftalmologie
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven - Campus Sint-Raphaël
    • Antioquia
      • Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia, 050016
        • Clinica de Oftalmologia San Diego
      • Brno, Czechia, 613 00
        • Fakultni nemocnice Brno
      • Praha 5, Czechia, 150 06
        • Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
      • Glostrup, Denmark, 2600
        • Rigshospitalet - Glostrup
      • Amiens, France, 80000
        • CHU d'Amiens -Centre Saint Victor
      • Lille Cedex, France, 59037
        • Hopital Claude Huriez
    • Cedex 19
      • Paris, Cedex 19, France, 75940
        • Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
      • Giessen, Germany, 35392
        • Universitaetsklinikum Giessen und Marburg
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Universitaetsklinikum Mainz
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54636
        • University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA
      • Fiumicino (Roma), Italy, 00050
        • Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu
      • Genova, Italy, 16147
        • Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Divisione di Oculistica
      • Milano, Italy, 20162
        • Unita' Operativa di Oculistica Pediatrica, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Niguarda Ca'Grande
    • CT
      • Catania, CT, Italy, 95123
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Univ.
    • Lima
      • Miraflores, Lima, Peru, L 18
        • Óptima Visión
      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-548
        • AIBILI - Associação para a Investigação Biomédica e Inovação em Luz e Imagem
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 83340
        • Detska Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou Bratislava
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41013
        • Hospital Virgen del Rocío
      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
    • Barcelona
      • Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08950
        • Hospital Sant Joan de Déu
      • Uppsala, Sweden, 751 85
        • Akademiska Sjukhuset
      • Västerås, Sweden, 721 89
        • Ögonkliniken, Centrallasarettet
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B18 7QH
        • Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Consultant Ophthalmologist
      • London, United Kingdom, EC1V 2PD
        • Richard Desmond Childrens Eye Centre
    • Gt Man
      • Manchester, Gt Man, United Kingdom, M13 9WH
        • Manchester Royal Eye Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pediatric populations diagnosed with glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female <18 years of age (neonates must be at least 36 weeks gestational age).
  • Diagnosis of pediatric glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure.
  • Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject (and/or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study. A signed and dated assent will be required where applicable according to local laws.

For treated subjects only:

  • Continuously treated with latanoprost for at least 1 month within the year prior to the baseline examination.

For untreated subjects only:

  • Continuously treated with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues for less than one month prior to the baseline examination (based on the best knowledge of treating ophthalmologists), and unlikely to be treated with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues during the three-year study period; OR
  • No prior treatment with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues, and unlikely to be treated with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues during the three-year study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable/unwilling to comply with protocol.
  • Pregnant or nursing females at baseline.
  • For treated subjects only: a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients contained in latanoprost (e.g., hypersensitivity to benzalkonium chloride).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Latanoprost-treatment group
Subjects continuously treated with Latanoprost for at least one month Latanoprost treatment during the study period.
Other Names:
  • Observational
Subjects not treated with any topical prostaglandin analogues or continuously treated with topical prostaglandin analogues for less than one month before the baseline examination, and unlikely to be treated with topical prostaglandin analogues during the study period.
Other Names:
  • Observational
Non-topical prostaglandin analogue treatment group
Subjects continuously treated with Latanoprost for at least one month Latanoprost treatment during the study period.
Other Names:
  • Observational
Subjects not treated with any topical prostaglandin analogues or continuously treated with topical prostaglandin analogues for less than one month before the baseline examination, and unlikely to be treated with topical prostaglandin analogues during the study period.
Other Names:
  • Observational

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Snellen or Equivalent)
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Patients familiar with the letters of the alphabet were evaluated using Snellen visual acuity. Patients who were unable or unfamiliar with the letters of the alphabet were evaluated using charts made up of numbers, pictures (eg, Schering's Children's Eye Chart or Allen Cards), E's, or Landolt's broken rings, and other methods which were equivalent to Snellen acuity eg, HOTV testing).
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Change in Refractive Error
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
The refractive error [cycloplegic where appropriate (eg, those unable to cooperate with manifest refraction)] were determined at the baseline visit and assessed at the following visits.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Horizontal Corneal Diameter (by Caliper and/or Ruler)
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
The horizontal corneal diameter was measured along the horizontal meridians. Diameter was measured using either a series of transparent plates with holes of different diameters in quarter-millimeter increments or with calibrated calipers compared against a ruler. When using calipers, the corneal diameter measurement was taken from limbus to a similar point 180° away at the opposite limbus. When not examining the children with anesthesia, it was recommended to use a tape measure across the head while measuring horizontal corneal diameter by photographic method.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
IOP was preferably measured using 1 of 3 applanation-contact methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry, Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen® (tonometry). iCare® rebound tonometer was also allowed if it was used consistently throughout the study.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Cup-to-disc Ratio (for Assessment of Optic Nerve Changes/Structures) - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration in Cup/Disc Ratios
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
The cup/disc ratio was recorded horizontally and vertically for each examination, and reported in 0.1 increments.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Visual Field Defects - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration of Visual Field Defects.
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
A visual field examination was performed for those patients who can cooperate automated perimetry utilizing a threshold program. All visual fields was conducted utilizing the standard white background with a Goldmann size III white stimulus. For those patients who can not perform formal visual field testing, then field to confrontation test was used for younger, non-verbal children, central, steady and maintains fixation was used.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Iris Color Darkening
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Changes from baseline in iris color were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Localized Pigmentation (Nevi or Freckles) of Conjunctiva, Iris and Choroid
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Changes from baseline in localized pigmentation (nevi and freckles) of the conjunctiva, iris and choroid were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Eyelash Darkening/Thickening
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Changes from baseline in eyelash darkening/thickening/lengthening were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Length of Eyelash (by Caliper and/or Ruler)
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
The longest eyelash (mm) measured by caliper or ruler was recorded at baseline and each follow-up visit.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Corneal Thickness (Pachymeter)
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Central corneal thickness was measured using a calibrated pachymeter, preferably an ultrasonic pachymeter.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Conjunctival/Ocular Hyperemia
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months

Conjunctiva hyperemia was assessed by slit-lamp examination. When slit-lamp examination is not possible due to subject cooperation, a fixation light and 20-diopter lens (for magnification) was used to assess this parameter. Conjunctival hyperemia was assessed and graded by ophthalmologist at baseline and follow-up visits from grades 0-3 and is as follows:

0 = None, Normal: few vessels of palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva easily observed

  1. = Mild, Reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva
  2. = Moderate, Bright reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva
  3. = Severe, Deep, bright, and diffuse reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Number of Participants With a Change in Anterior Segment Biomicroscopy
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Slit-lamp biomicroscopy (mounted or hand-held) without fluorescein and without dilation of the pupil was performed. When slit-lamp examination was not possible, a fixation light and 20-diopter lens (for magnification) was used. At each scheduled visit, deposition of pigment on the corneal endothelial layer or the lens capsule or any abnormalities of the lids, conjunctivae, cornea, anterior chamber, iris, or lens was examined.
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at Baseline
Time Frame: Evaluated at Baseline

Fundoscopy was performed after dilation of the pupils (eg, 1 % tropicamide or cyclopentolate and 2 ½ % phenylephrine, or a clinically- appropriate dose according to the clinician's standard care of each particular patient). The examination included an evaluation of the vitreous body, retina (including the macula), and optic nerve head.

The fundoscopy e-CRF was completed only at baseline because the investigators were required to perform slit lamp, direct or indirect ophthalmoscopy at each visit and report any AEs observed which included the vitreous, retina and optic nerve.

Evaluated at Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A6111143
  • PFI-LAT-2009-01 (Other Identifier: Alias Study Number)
  • LYNX (Other Identifier: Other identifier)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ocular Hypertension

Clinical Trials on No intervention other than routine medical care

Subscribe