Sngception and Pain in Spine Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathways

The Role of Sngception and Pain in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Spine Surgeries

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a recognized, evidence-based and patient-centered clinical pathway that has an array of benefits. Minimally invasive techniques, a cyclopedic pain management plan and precise administration of anesthetics, which will render patients a rapid and comfortable recovery if executed correctly, followed by early mobilization and discharge.

Pain management practice is traveling through a paradigm shift as opioid crises arise in the western countries. Opioid-based pain control is being disarmed and replaced by multimodal analgesia (MMA) and becoming the mainstay strategy. Opioids are increasingly being reserved as rescue medications. MMA target different parts of the nociceptive pathway, preventing its wind-up during surgery. Decreased firing of the nociceptive neurons may be linked to lower postoperative pain scores or even the suppressing chronic pain incidence. In our ERAS pathway, we implement erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as the main analgesic firepower.

As postoperative pain decreases, an observed rising complaint is "sng", or soreness, in native Taiwanese in our ERAS spine patients. It is very different from the nociceptive "pain" we are familiar with. Patients avoid movements if it causes pain, but they tend to stretch or adjust postures if sngception dominates. The term "sngception" has been proposed in 2018 by Taiwanese scholars. It is believed to be a sense of acidosis, possibly within the muscles. Acidosis and associated pain are well documented, such as in muscle aches from exercise, cancer or diabetic ketoacidosis. The underlying mechanism is yet to be established but does not entirely overlap with nociception. There are numerous similarities of sngception in our patients and sngception:

  1. a sensation different from nociception,
  2. usual painkillers are ineffective, suggesting an alternative route of transmission,
  3. relieved by movement,
  4. inflammation and acidosis in the vicinity of surgical wound. In this study, we intended to characterize sngception by observing various perioperative factors, as well as the short- and long- term outcomes they bring. This will be done through a detailed sngception and pain trajectory analysis. Only when we know the main causative factor(s), we can design treatment plans toward guarding against sngception. This further improves the quality of postoperative recovery and safety as less opioids may be required as rescue medications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Taipei
      • Taipei City, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients receiving routine ERAS management for spine surgeries. All patients will be screened for eligibility.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing routine ERAS protocol for spine surgeries
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) I~III

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Communication issues that preclude proper preoperative counselling for ERAS and study design.
  2. Active alcohol or drug addiction.
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Allergy to main anesthetics that preclude the use of routine ERAS anesthesia management.
  5. Patient refusal to participate in study.
  6. Emergent operations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ERAS group
Routine spine surgical patients receiving ERAS protocol that complies with current guidelines.
No specific intervention other than routine anesthesia protocol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Sngception (Sng)
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery.
Sng score evaluated by the numerical rating scale (NRS, score 0~10).
From enrollment to 1 year after surgery.
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery.
Pain score evaluated by the numerical rating scale (NRS, score 0~10).
From enrollment to 1 year after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine consumption
Time Frame: From enrollment to discharge, an average of 5 days.
Postoperative morphine consumption converted to Morphine Sulfate Equivalents (MSE)
From enrollment to discharge, an average of 5 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Postoperative

Clinical Trials on No specific intervention other than routine anesthesia protocol

Subscribe