Tomotherapy vs Conventional Radiation for Adjuvant Pelvic RT in Ca Cervix (PARCER)

June 9, 2020 updated by: Supriya Sastri (chopra), Tata Memorial Hospital

Phase III Randomized Trial of Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) and Conventional Radiotherapy for Late Toxicity Reduction After Postoperative Radiotherapy in Ca Cervix.

The study tests Tomtherapy based Image Guided Radiation against conventional radiation techniques for it's ability to reduce long term small bowel toxicity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postoperative pelvic radiotherapy (+/- chemotherapy) leads to reduction in the risk of local recurrence and improves progression free survival (PFS) in patients with post-operative intermediate and high risk factors following Wertheim's hysterectomy. However, adjuvant external beam radiotherapy and vaginal cuff brachytherapy increase the risk of small bowel toxicity such that patients undergoing external beam pelvic radiotherapy and vaginal cuff brachytherapy may have 15-18% incidence of late RTOG ≥ grade II small bowel toxicity. Phase II studies using new techniques like Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) have reported up to 50% reduction in small bowel doses with up to 30% reduction in ≥ grade II acute toxicity. However, there is no randomized data demonstrating the benefit of highly specific and conformal techniques like image guided (IG)-IMRT in reducing radiation induced small bowel toxicity in patients with cervical cancers. The present study is being proposed to test if use of IG-IMRT with Tomotherapy is associated with reduced small bowel late toxicity

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maharashtra
      • Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 410210
        • Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histopathological diagnosis of carcinoma cervix with postoperative intermediate or high risk features.
  • Age >18 years.
  • Planned for Wertheim's hysterectomy or has already undergone Wertheim's hysterectomy OR has undergone Simple Hysterectomy with no evidence of residual nodes on MRI/PET imaging+/- confirmatory nodal biopsy.
  • No evidence of paraaortic nodal metastasis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of multiple previous abdominal surgeries placing patient at baseline high risk of bowel toxicity or any other medical condition with baseline bowel movement disorder.
  • Rectal Polyps or extensive hemorrhoids.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional RT
Patients in this arm will receive conventional radiation with or without chemotherapy
Standard Pelvic Radiation 50 Gy/ 25 fractions over 5 weeks
Experimental: Tomotherapy based IGRT
Patients in this arm will receive Tomotherapy based IGRT with or without chemotherapy
Patients in this arm will received Tomotherapy based Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy to a dose of 50 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Late bowel toxicity ≥ Grade II
Time Frame: Median follow up of 3 years
Time to event and severity of late bowel toxicity are assessed
Median follow up of 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To identify small bowel dose volume characteristics that predict for ≥ Grade II late toxicity
Time Frame: Median follow up of 3 years
Data on dosimetric analysis of small bowel dose in reference to volume are collected in both arms and assessed for predicting dose prescription for ≥ grade II late bowel toxcity
Median follow up of 3 years
To evaluate acute toxicity difference in two study arms using CTCAE version 3.0
Time Frame: Within 90 days
Acute toxicity will be reported using CTCAE V.3.0. CTCAE forms will be filled before starting radiation, weekly during radiation treatment and on each scheduled follow-up. If any toxicity occurs at another time point additional forms will be filled to capture the same. Acute toxicity difference will be calculated between the two study arms.
Within 90 days
Preoperative functional imaging features that predict for local and distant recurrence will be identified
Time Frame: 3 years after completion of accrual
Images acquired pre-operatively are analysed for features that predict local and distant recurrence.
3 years after completion of accrual
To compare quality of life between Tomotherapy vs conventional radiotherapy arm using EORTC QLQ C30
Time Frame: 3 years from completion of accrual

Assessment is done for all enrolled patients to compare the quality of life after treatment with tomotherapy and conventional radiation . EORTC QLQC30 module will be used for evaluating QOL of patients. QOL scoring will be done as per standard recommendations outlined in EORTC QLQ C30 scoring manual. All patients will undergo QOL evaluation at baseline, after treatment and at subsequent follow-up. Scale- Not at all-1 , A little Bit-2, Quite a bit-3, very much-4.

1 will be considered as better outcome & 4 will be considered as worst outcome.

3 years from completion of accrual
To compare quality of life between Tomotherapy vs conventional radiotherapy arm using EORTC QLQ CX24
Time Frame: 3 years from completion of accrual

Assessment is done for all enrolled patients to compare the quality of life after treatment with tomotherapy and conventional radiation. EORTC QLQCX24 module will be used to assess disease-specific and treatment-specific aspects of QoL in patients with cervical cancer. CX24 QOL scoring will be done as per standard recommendations outlined in EORTC QLQ CX24 scoring manual. All patients will undergo QOL evaluation at baseline, after treatment and at subsequent follow-up.

Scale- Not at all-1 , A little Bit-2, Quite a bit-3, very much-4.

1 will be considered as better outcome & 4 will be considered as worst outcome.

3 years from completion of accrual

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Supriya Chopra, MD,DNB, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Project 803

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer Cervix

Clinical Trials on Conventional Radiation

3
Subscribe