- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01279642
Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters (PICC) in Children Guided by Ultrasound
January 18, 2011 updated by: Federal University of São Paulo
The Use of Doppler Vascular Ultrasound by Nurses During the Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Children: Clinical, Randomized and Controlled Trial.
Aimed to compare the success in the peripheral intravenous puncture (PIP), progression and placement of PICC in children, according to the use of Doppler vascular ultrasound (DVUS) or traditional method; to identify the influence of the DUVS in the time expended to PICC placement.
Methods: Clinical, randomized and controlled trial conducted after ethical merits of research endorsement and the obtaining of consent for those responsible for the children.
The sample, calculated in 42 PICC to obtain a power of 0,85, was distributed randomly into two groups, experimental group (EG) and controlled group (CG).
To the statistical analyzes Pearson Chi-square, Fisher's Exact Tests, Generalization of Fischer's Exact and Mann-Whitney tests was applied (5%).
Of the 42 catheters, 21 (50.0%) were implemented in EG and 21 (50.0%) in CG.
The PIP was obtained in the first attempt in 90.5% of the punctures of the EG and in 47.6% of the GC, (p=0.003).
PICC were implanted successfully in 18 (85.7%)
children of GE and 11 (61.1%) of CG (p = 0.019).
The median of the time spent to the procedure was significantly higher (p=0.001) in CG (50 minutes) when compared to EG (median 20 minutes).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Introduction: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) are increasingly being used to intravenous therapy in a wide variety of adults and pediatrics patients.
Children may have characteristics that could compromise the assertiveness during the catheter placement, even for the more experienced and qualified professionals.
In order to search for methods that could lead to the nursing practice innovation seeking for better results in the placement of PICC, this study was designed to analyze the use of Doppler vascular ultrasound (DVUS) to PICC insertion performed by nurses.
Objective: To compare the success in the peripheral intravenous puncture (PIP), progression and placement of PICC in children, according to the use of DVUS or traditional method; to identify the influence of the DUVS in the time expended to the placement of PICC in children.
Methods: Clinical, randomized and controlled trial conducted in a pediatric surgery ward of a university hospital, from August 17th, 2007 to August 19th, 2008, after ethical merits of research endorsement and the obtaining of consent for those responsible for the children.
The sample, calculated in 42 PICC to obtain a power of 0,85, was distributed randomly into two groups, experimental group (EG) and controlled group (CG).
The dependent variables were: the success in the PIP, catheter progression and placement.
Variables related to children and IV therapy was investigated.
To the statistical analyzes Pearson Chi-square, Fisher's Exact Tests, Generalization of Fischer's Exact and Mann-Whitney tests was applied (significance level of 5%).
Results: Of the 42 catheters, 21 (50.0%) were implemented in EG and 21 (50.0%) in CG.
The PIP was obtained in the first attempt in 90.5% of the punctures of the EG and in 47.6% of the GC, (p=0.003)and the punctures were accomplished to catheter insertion, despite the number of attempts in 76.5% of EG and 41.7% in GC (p = 0.001).
The successful to PICC progression was marginally significant result (p=0.069),
69.2% in EG and 44.0% in CG.
PICC were implanted successfully in 18 (85.7%)
children of GE and 11 (61.1%) of CG (p = 0.019).
The median of the time spent to the procedure was significantly higher (p=0.001) in CG (50 minutes) when compared to EG (median 20 minutes).
Conclusion: The results obtained lead to the conclusion that the use of USVD to the implementation of the PICC in children promoted greater success in the PIP and in PICC placement, reducing of the time spent to the procedure, but no significant influence was observed regarding the catheter progression.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
42
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
São Paulo, Brazil, 04024002
- Federal University of São Paulo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 month to 18 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children in IV Therapy for 7 days or more;
- Peripheral venous vessels indicated to PICC
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient or family refuse to consent in PICC insertion.
- Patient or family refuse to participate in the research.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: ultrasound
Use of ultrasound to PICC placement
|
Doppler vascular ultrasound guidance to PICC insertion in children -
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Control group
PICC placement by inspection and visualization of site
|
traditional approach of PICC insertion by visualization and inspection of insertion site
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Success in PICC placement.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The PICC was placed in the first attempt in 90.5% of the punctures of the ultrasound group and in 47.6% of the control group (p=0.003
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time spent to PICC placement
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The median time spent to the procedure was significantly higher (p=0.001) in control group (50 minutes) when compared to ultrasound group (median 20 minutes).
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 18, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
January 19, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 19, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 18, 2011
Last Verified
July 1, 2010
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1967/06
- CNPq Grant nº. 476295/2004-1. (Other Identifier: National Council Scientific Development Brazil)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Peripheral Vascular Disease
-
Stanford UniversityTerminatedPAD - Peripheral Arterial Disease | PVD- Peripheral Vascular DiseaseUnited States
-
C. R. BardCromsourceCompletedVascular Diseases, PeripheralGermany, Poland
-
University of NebraskaNot yet recruitingPeripheral Arterial Disease | Peripheral Vascular Diseases | Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
SensomeRecruitingPeripheral Vascular DiseaseBelgium
-
Biotronik, Inc.CompletedPeripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseCanada, United States
-
Biotronik AGBiotronik, Inc.UnknownPeripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseGermany, Belgium, Austria, Switzerland
-
Acotec Scientific Co., LtdRecruitingPeripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) | Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD)China
-
Stanford UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Not yet recruitingPeripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
University of MichiganTerminatedPeripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
Baylor UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingArterial Occlusive Diseases | Peripheral Arterial Disease | Atherosclerosis | Vascular Diseases, PeripheralUnited States
Clinical Trials on ultrasound
-
Ahram Canadian UniversityCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome | Median Neuropathy, Carpal TunnelEgypt
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterWithdrawn
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Withdrawn
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institute for Biomedical Imaging...RecruitingBreast CarcinomaUnited States
-
Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingShoulder Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder Pain
-
John PelleritoGeneral ElectricActive, not recruiting
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityRecruiting
-
Yale UniversityCompletedPneumonia | Pulmonary Edema | DyspneaUnited States