Short Term Follow-up of Patient Implanted With the Proximal Interphalangeal Implant

September 10, 2014 updated by: Integra LifeSciences Services

Short Term Follow-up of Patient Implanted With the Proximal Interphalangeal

Hammertoe and ClawToe are ones of the most common foot deformities. The second toe is the most frequently affected, but the other small toes may also be involved. When nonoperative treatment fails, surgery often is recommended. One surgical option is the arthrodesis of the Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) joint. This arthrodesis is technically demanding, its needs:

  • Internal fixation;
  • Interphalangeal Compression;
  • Anatomic PIP joint plantar flexion angle. The implant Ipp-On has been developed for this specific arthrodesis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Proximal Interphalangeal Implant: Ipp-On at short term follow up.

The safety of the Ipp-On will be described in terms of rate of device related complications.

The efficacy of the Ipp-On will be described in terms of fusion rate at 6 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

156

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brugge, Belgium
        • Sint Lucas Clinic
      • Bordeaux, France
        • CHU Pellegrin
      • Lyon, France
        • Clinique du parc
      • Paris, France
        • ICP
      • Bellinzona, Switzerland
        • Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Any patient who needs a proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis for whose surgeon has recommended that a proximal Interphalangeal Implant Ipp-On be implanted

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient who needs a proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis for whose surgeon has recommended that a proximal Interphalangeal Implant Ipp-On be implanted
  • Age >= 18 years
  • Have willingness to give his/her Data Transfer Authorization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication of the implantation of the Ipp-On The implant should not be used in a patient who has currently, or who has a history of: • Active local or systemic infection

    • Severe peripheral vascular disease
    • Severe longitudinal deformity
    • Insufficient quantity or quality of bone to permit stabilization of the arthrodesis
    • Conditions that restrict the patient's ability or willingness to follow postoperative instructions during the healing process
    • Suspected or documented metal allergy or intolerance.
  • History of prior mental illness or patient demonstrates that their mental capacity may interfere with their ability to follow the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Ipp-On
Patient implanted with the Ipp-On

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of device related complications
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
fusion rate
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Fusion rate
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Lesser Metatarsophalangeal Scale (AOFAS LMIS) score
Time Frame: 6 months/12 months
6 months/12 months
Radiological Evaluation
Time Frame: 6 months/12 months
6 months/12 months
Clinical Assessment
Time Frame: 6 months/12 months
6 months/12 months
Subjective assessment
Time Frame: 6 months/12 months
6 months/12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 11, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RECON-EMEA-08

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Claw Toe

3
Subscribe