MC5-A Scrambler Therapy in Reducing Peripheral Neuropathy Caused by Chemotherapy

January 16, 2014 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Scrambler Therapy for the Treatment of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: An Evaluation of a Sham Procedure and Phase II Trial

RATIONALE: Scrambler therapy may help relieve pain from peripheral neuropathy caused by chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well MC5-A scrambler therapy works in reducing peripheral neuropathy caused by chemotherapy

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To explore the feasibility of studying scrambler therapy versus a sham procedure for the alleviation of lower extremity chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To obtain prospective pilot experience with recommended scrambler therapy, with regards to treatment efficacy to determine effect size estimates, patient related outcome measurement tools that we use in this trial, tolerability, and analgesic use.

OUTLINE: Patients undergo a sham procedure on the back or scrambler therapy on both lower extremities for up to 30 minutes with the Calmare MC5-A device and cutaneous electrode patches applied above and below the area of pain on days 1 and 2. Patients continue scrambler therapy for 10 days in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Received neurotoxic chemotherapy (including taxanes-such as paclitaxel or docetaxel, or platinum-based compounds such as carboplatin or cis-platinum or oxaliplatin, or vinca alkaloids such as vincristine, vinblastine, or vinorelbine, or proteosome inhibitors such as bortezomib); Note: this neurotoxic chemotherapy must have been completed more than 3 months prior to when they enter this trial
  • Pain or symptoms of peripheral neuropathy in the feet of >= 1 month (30 days) duration attributed to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, for which the patient wants intervention
  • Participants have to relate that numbness, tingling or pain in their toes/feet was at least a four out of ten problem during the prior week, on a 0-10 scale where zero was no problem and ten was the worst possible problem
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) = 0, 1, or 2
  • Life expectancy >= 3 months (90 days)
  • Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
  • Provide informed written consent
  • No change in scheduled analgesic agents for at least one week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • CIPN troubles in the lower extremities more proximal to the mid calf
  • Patients with implantable drug delivery systems, e.g. Medtronic Synchromed
  • Patients with heart stents or metal implants such as pacemakers, automatic defibrillators, aneurysm clips, vena cava clips and skull plates; (metal implants for orthopedic repair, e.g. pins, clips, plates, cages, joint replacements are allowed as are central venous access devices)
  • Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease within the past six months
  • Patients with history of epilepsy, brain damage, use of anti-convulsants, symptomatic brain metastases
  • Other identified causes of painful lower extremity paresthesias existing prior to chemotherapy (e.g., radiation or malignant plexopathy, lumbar or cervical radiculopathy, pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of another etiology: B12 deficiency, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome [AIDS], monoclonal gammopathy, diabetes, heavy metal poisoning amyloidosis, syphilis, hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, inherited neuropathy, etc.)
  • Skin conditions such as open sores that would prevent proper application of the electrodes
  • Other medical or other condition(s) that in the opinion of the investigators might compromise the objectives of the study
  • Prior treatment with Calmare MC-5A therapy for any reason or knowledge of application procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Supportive Care
See Detailed Description
Ancillary studies
Undergo MC5-A therapy
Other Names:
  • TENPS
  • transcutaneous electromanipulation by nervous patterns scrambler therapy
Undergo sham procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Who Have at Least a 50% Reduction (i.e., Success) in at Least 1 of the First 12 Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) Measurement Questions in the Pre/Post Therapy Questionnaire
Time Frame: On days 1 and 2
CIPN measurement items score range: 0 (none) to 10 (as bad as can be). The questions assessed the intensity of numbness, tingling, or pain in toes or feet that patients have had right now, at its worst over the past 24 hours, and on average over the past 24 hours.
On days 1 and 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Change of CIPN Symptoms Between Sham Procedure and Scrambler Therapy as Measured by Each Individual Question
Time Frame: On days 1 and 2
The 12 CIPN symptoms individual question range: 0 (none) to 10 (as bad as can be). The questions assessed the intensity of numbness, tingling, or pain in toes or feet that patients have had right now (RN), at its worst over the past 24 hours (WP24H), and on average over the past 24 hours (AvgP24H). Averaged change between day 1 and day 2 across 10 patients was calculated.
On days 1 and 2
Percentage of Reduction at Days 10 From Day 1 in Each of the 12 CIPN Measurement Questions in the Daily Therapy Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 10
The 12 CIPN symptoms individual question range: 0 (none) to 10 (as bad as can be). The questions assessed the intensity of numbness, tingling, or pain in toes or feet that patients have had right now (RN), at its worst over the past 24 hours (WP24H), and on average over the past 24 hours (AvgP24H).
Day 1 and Day 10
Percentage of Reduction at Weeks 10 From Week 1 in CIPN Symptoms as Measured by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Peripheral Neuropathy Question
Time Frame: Week 1 and Week 10
The NCCTG peripheral neuropathy question range: 0 (No numbness or tingling or pain in fingers and/or toes) to 10 (Numbness, tingling or pain in fingers and/pr toes as bad as you can imagine). The question assessed the intensity of numbness, tingling or pain in toes or feet in the past week.
Week 1 and Week 10
Percent Change From Day 1 at Week 10 in CIPN Symptom Bother as Measured by 8 CIPN Symptom Questions
Time Frame: Day 1 and Week 10
The intensity of symptom was measured in a likert scale: none at all (0), a little bit (1), quite a bit (2) and very much (3). Percent change from day 1 at week 10 for each patient was calculated and average of percentage was reported.
Day 1 and Week 10
Toxicity (Other Than CIPN) Profile Associated With Scrambler Therapy as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 10
CTCAE Grading: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening, Grade 5=Death.
Day 1 to Day 10
Analgesic Use Over Time
Time Frame: On days 1-11 and for 10 weeks after therapy
On days 1-11 and for 10 weeks after therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Charles Loprinzi, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MC10C8 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2011-00109 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • 10-007874 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic IRB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on questionnaire administration

Subscribe