Cryotherapy vs. LEEP to Treat Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 Among HIV-positive Women (PHE-LEEP)

October 19, 2019 updated by: Michael Chung, University of Washington

Impact of Cryotherapy Versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) on Recurrence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and HIV-1 Cervical Shedding Among HIV-positive Women

The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among HIV-positive women receiving cryotherapy versus LEEP over 2 years of follow-up and to compare the shedding of HIV-1 from the cervix between HIV-positive women receiving cryotherapy versus LEEP over 3 weeks of follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The recent scale-up of antiretroviral treatment programs in resource-limited settings provides an unprecedented opportunity to implement a comprehensive cervical cancer screening and treatment program for women who, by virtue of having HIV, are at significant risk for cervical disease. Unfortunately, even if screening is offered free of charge to millions of women living with HIV, it is unclear which treatment modality for pre-cancerous cervical lesions will be most effective since HIV appears to affect outcomes of treatment by increasing the recurrence and severity of cervical disease. Cervical treatment may also increase shedding of HIV from the cervix which may put discordant couples at risk and possibly spread HIV more widely. This study proposes to randomize HIV-positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3 (CIN 2 and 3) to cryotherapy vs. loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and measure the recurrence of cervical disease in each group over 2-years of follow-up as well as HIV shedding from the cervix for 6 weeks after treatment.

Our hypothesis is that compared to cryotherapy, LEEP is significantly more likely to prevent recurrence of cervical lesions over 2 years of follow-up and less likely to cause shedding of HIV-1 from the cervix over 3 weeks of follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nairobi, Kenya, 21570-00505
        • Coptic Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV positive receiving care at the Coptic Hope Center
  • Not pregnant by clinical examination or history
  • Have an intact cervix
  • Have not received prior cervical treatment
  • Do not have a history of a bleeding disorder
  • Are above 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-negative
  • Male
  • Below 18 years of age
  • Pregnant by clinical examination or history
  • Post-hysterectomy
  • Post-cervical cancer treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cryotherapy
Cryotherapy procedure involves using a cryoprobe and carbon dioxide or nitrous oxide gas to freeze the diseased part of the cervix
Cryotherapy procedure involves using a cryoprobe and carbon dioxide or nitrous oxide gas to freeze the diseased part of the cervix
Experimental: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) uses a low-voltage electrified wire loop to cut out diseased part of cervix
LEEP procedure uses a low-voltage electrified wire loop to cut out diseased part of cervix
Other Names:
  • LEEP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Among HIV-positive Women
Time Frame: 2 years
Rate of recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among HIV-positive women receiving cryotherapy versus LEEP over 2 years of follow-up
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shedding of HIV-1 From the Cervix Between HIV-positive Women
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Shedding of HIV-1 from the cervix between HIV-positive women receiving cryotherapy versus LEEP between baseline and weeks 1, 2, and 3 of follow-up
3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Chung, MD, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 35995-J
  • KE.09.0238 (Other Identifier: Kenya Ethical Review Committee)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Clinical Trials on Cryotherapy

3
Subscribe