Investigation of KLYX in Patients With Constipation

February 3, 2012 updated by: Ferring Pharmaceuticals

Efficacy and Safety of KLYX Versus Glycerine Enema in Chinese Patients With Constipation - a Randomised, Assessor-blind Pilot Study

This is a randomised, assessor-blind, multi-centre pilot study to investigate the comparative safety and efficacy of KLYX and glycerine enema in the symptomatic treatment of constipation in Chinese patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China
        • Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
      • Shanghai, China
        • Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
      • Shanghai, China
        • ChangHai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have signed the informed consent form and have been verbally explained the details of the trial and treatment procedures
  • Ethnically Chinese
  • Males or females aged between 18 and 65 years inclusive
  • A history of constipation symptoms for at least 6 months fulfilling, with occurrence of two or more of the following symptoms during the 3 months before screening (the 3 months need not be consecutive):

    i. Very hard (pellet-like) and/or hard stools (Type 1 or 2 of the Bristol Stool Scale) for at least 25% of the time; or ii. Sensation of incomplete evacuation at least 25% of the time; or iii. Straining during defecation at least 25% of the time; or iv. Sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage often during defecation at least 25% of the time; or v. Manual manoeuvres needed often to facilitate defecations (e.g. digital evacuation, support of the pelvic floor) at least 25% of the time; or vi. Fewer than 3 defecations per week.

  • Patient has had no bowel movement (i.e. still constipated) two days prior randomisation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any disorder or laboratory result at Screening that in the judgement of the investigator that will place the subject at excessive risk if participating in a controlled study
  • Clinically suspected to have colorectal cancer
  • Significant gastroparesis or gastric outlet obstruction
  • Hypersensitivity to sodium docusate and/or sorbitol
  • Hypersensitivity to glycerine
  • Pregnant or lactating women, women who intend to conceive, or women who are sexually active and capable of pregnancy who are not using a method of birth control (e.g. prescription hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device, double-barrier method, male partner sterilization)
  • Diabetic patients currently on insulin therapy
  • Having participated in other clinical trial(s) within the 3 (three) months prior screening
  • Unable to withdraw medications that may affect gastrointestinal motility such as prokinetics, erythromycin analogues, laxatives, etc.
  • Unable to meet or perform study requirements: known or suspected inability to comply with the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: KLYX
Active Comparator: Glycerine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall efficacy of enema
Time Frame: immediately following enema administration
immediately following enema administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to first bowel movement
Time Frame: Immediately following enema administration
Immediately following enema administration
Patient's overall satisfaction with enema treatment
Time Frame: Immediately following enema administration
Immediately following enema administration
Stool form after enema treatment
Time Frame: Immediately following enema administration
Immediately following enema administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Constipation

Clinical Trials on KLYX

Subscribe