Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Steroids in the Treatment of Abnormal Scars (Keloids, Hypertrophic Scars)

October 18, 2020 updated by: Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Steroids in the Treatment of Abnormal Scars (Keloids and hypertrophic Scars)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

On a yearly basis, millions develop different skin scarring. These scars are a public reminder of the traumatic incident, past or present disease or a surgery which caused them.

Scarring is a common consequence of wound healing process, and it is one of the most complex biological processes in human. This healing process is affected by numerous factors and thus can be disrupted, leading to pathological scarring.

Pathological scarring is common in people with genetic predisposition, those undergone complex and massive surgeries, burns or those wounded in unsanitary environments. Apart from being aesthetically unpleasant, scars are associated with functional and psychosocial morbidities.

Despite clinical, pathologic and pathogenic differences between keloids and hypertrophic scars, treatments are similar.

Scars have a negative external impact causing social distress and impaired self-image, and as a consequence, low satisfaction rates following surgical and cosmetic procedures.

The first line treatment is monthly intralesional corticosteroid injections with a response rate of 50-100% and recurrence of 50%.

There are a few steroids available and used for abnormal scars treatment, including Celestone chronodose (Betamethasone acetate + Betamethasone sodium phosphate), Dexamethasone sodium phosphate, Methylprednisolone acetate, Methylprednisolone sodium succinate, Methylprednisolone hemisuccinate, Triamcinolone acetonide.

Steroids are different by their hydrophilic properties, potency and half-life, although the half-life of intralesional injections is not known. Inspite of being widely used, there have never been a comparative study of the different steroid treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 20 participants with at least 4 keloids
  • 20 participants with a hypertrophic scar of at least 11 cm length

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current or planned pregnancy
  • breastfeeding women
  • participants suffering from diabetes mellitus or coagulation disorders
  • infection at planned injection sites
  • systemic treatment of corticosteroids, 5-fluorouracil
  • known allergy to any of the following: Betamethasone acetate + Betamethasone sodium phosphate, Triamcinolone acetonide, Dexamethasone sodium phosphate, Methylprednisolone acetate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: keloids
each patient will be injection by all 4 steroids for comparison patients with 4 or more keloids will be injection with each steroid for different keloid
the steroid will be injected to either a keloid or a 1.5 c"m of the 11 c"m hypertrophic scar
the steroid will be injected to either a keloid or a 1.5 c"m of the 11 c"m hypertrophic scar
the steroid will be injected to either a keloid or a 1.5 c"m of the 11 c"m hypertrophic scar
the steroid will be injected to either a keloid or a 1.5 c"m of the 11 c"m hypertrophic scar
Active Comparator: hypertrophic scars
each patient will be injection by all 4 steroids for comparison patients with a 11 cm hypertrophic scar will be injected by all 4 steroids along the scar with a 1 cm distance between each steroid
the steroid will be injected to either a keloid or a 1.5 c"m of the 11 c"m hypertrophic scar
the steroid will be injected to either a keloid or a 1.5 c"m of the 11 c"m hypertrophic scar
the steroid will be injected to either a keloid or a 1.5 c"m of the 11 c"m hypertrophic scar
the steroid will be injected to either a keloid or a 1.5 c"m of the 11 c"m hypertrophic scar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Time Frame: enrollment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
For the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the investigators score the following parameters of each part of the scar on a scale ranging from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst scar imagin¬able): 'vascularization', 'pigmentation', 'thickness', 'relief', and 'pliability'. The total score on the OSAS is the sum of the scores of each item, yielding a total score ranging from 6 (best) to 60 (worst). For the patient scar assessment scale (PSAS), the participants used a scale of 1 to 10 to answer questions relating to pain, itching, color, stiffness, irregularity and thickness. The total score on the PSAS was the sum of the scores of each item, yielding a total score ranging from 6 (best) to 60 (worst)
enrollment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Time Frame: 3 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
For the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the investigators score the following parameters of each part of the scar on a scale ranging from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst scar imagin¬able): 'vascularization', 'pigmentation', 'thickness', 'relief', and 'pliability'. The total score on the OSAS is the sum of the scores of each item, yielding a total score ranging from 6 (best) to 60 (worst). For the patient scar assessment scale (PSAS), the participants used a scale of 1 to 10 to answer questions relating to pain, itching, color, stiffness, irregularity and thickness. The total score on the PSAS was the sum of the scores of each item, yielding a total score ranging from 6 (best) to 60 (worst)
3 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Time Frame: 6 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
For the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the investigators score the following parameters of each part of the scar on a scale ranging from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst scar imagin¬able): 'vascularization', 'pigmentation', 'thickness', 'relief', and 'pliability'. The total score on the OSAS is the sum of the scores of each item, yielding a total score ranging from 6 (best) to 60 (worst). For the patient scar assessment scale (PSAS), the participants used a scale of 1 to 10 to answer questions relating to pain, itching, color, stiffness, irregularity and thickness. The total score on the PSAS was the sum of the scores of each item, yielding a total score ranging from 6 (best) to 60 (worst)
6 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale (pain scale)
Time Frame: at each of the three treatment appointments, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
1 - paineless, 10- extremely painfull
at each of the three treatment appointments, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
Dermatologist's assessment
Time Frame: 3 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
0- no change, 1-minor change <5%, 2-Mild change - 25-50%, 3- Moderate Change 50-75%, 4-Significant change > 75%
3 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
3D camera
Time Frame: 3 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
improvement percentage of scar volume
3 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
Participant's assessment
Time Frame: 3 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
0- no change, 1-minor change <5%, 2-Mild change - 25-50%, 3- Moderate Change 50-75%, 4-Significant change > 75%
3 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
Dermatologist's assessment
Time Frame: 6 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
0- no change, 1-minor change <5%, 2-Mild change - 25-50%, 3- Moderate Change 50-75%, 4-Significant change > 75%
6 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
3D camera
Time Frame: 6 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
improvement percentage of scar volume
6 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
Participant's assessment
Time Frame: 6 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year
0- no change, 1-minor change <5%, 2-Mild change - 25-50%, 3- Moderate Change 50-75%, 4-Significant change > 75%
6 months post last treatment, data will be reported through study completion an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scars

Clinical Trials on Betamethasone acetate + Betamethasone sodium phosphate

Subscribe