Efficacy and Safety of Two Pharmacologic Strategies on Neurocognitive Impairment in HIV Infection. The TRIANT-TE Study

Exploratory Controlled Prospective Randomized Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Pharmacology Strategies on Neurocognitive Impairment in HIV Infection. The TRIANT-TE Study

The current project proposes the comparison of two pharmacologic strategies as adjunctive treatments for the improvement of HIV-associated neurocognitive disruption, additionally to use of HAART. The investigators propose the use of the compound that has shown greatest benefits in this context to date, the lithium, versus the use of a well-tolerated and promising drug in other pathologies with neurocognitive affectation, such as Alzheimer or Parkinson diseases, which is the rivastigmine. In those other diseases, this second compound has recently offered a good tolerability, but also benefits on attention, memory and other neurocognitive areas. Both study groups, patients on therapy with lithium and patients on therapy with rivastigmine, will be compared to a control group, which will not initiate any other treatment (therefore only continuing antiretroviral therapy). The investigators are aware that this proposal will offer new relevant data for the study of neurocognitive improvement in HIV infection, as well will allow a better knowledge of clinical management of HIV-infected patients with CNS disease, an aspect that is a common clinical concern today.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Adjunctive treatments based on neurocognitive improvement for HIV-infected patients with CNS disruption have consisted essentially of neurostimulant or neuroprotective treatments. Reports published to date have involved valproic acid, peptide T, CPI-1189, selegiline, memantine, minocycline and lithium. Regarding valproic acid, two trials have confirmed lack of benefit using this compound on HIV-associated neurocognitive decline. In case of peptide T, CPI-1189, selegiline, memantine and minocycline, although their potential mechanisms on brain follow different pathways, trend towards improvement on neurocognitive functioning has been observed. Nonetheless, results on those trials are particularly based on a short term and, moreover, mild connections with benefits on neurocognitive and functional measures have been established. The lithium has been the compound showing clearest benefits on this regard. Two reports have consistently demonstrated benefits on neurocognitive performance using this neuroprotective agent, both in patients with HIV and showing impairment previously. However, lithium is well known to be a drug not easily incorporated in routine practice, at least further than in a psychiatry context. In addition, adverse events related to their use are relatively frequent, and therefore clinical follow-up must be especially controlled. Besides, lithium concentrations are also a concerning aspect considering its use, and drug plasma levels are recommended to be performed throughout the therapy application.

For all these reasons, the current project proposes the comparison of two pharmacologic strategies as adjunctive treatments for the improvement of HIV-associated neurocognitive disruption, additionally to use of HAART. The investigators propose the use of the compound that has shown greatest benefits in this context to date, the lithium, versus the use of a well-tolerated and promising drug in other pathologies with neurocognitive affectation, such as Alzheimer or Parkinson diseases, which is the rivastigmine. In those other diseases, this second compound has recently offered a good tolerability, but also benefits on attention, memory and other neurocognitive areas. Furthermore, in the case of this project, rivastigmine is suggested to be used through a transdermal system patch, a fact that can provide suitability and comfortability with regard to the selected administration method. Both study groups, patients on therapy with lithium and patients on therapy with rivastigmine, will be compared to a control group, which will not initiate any other treatment (therefore only continuing antiretroviral therapy). The investigators are aware that this proposal will offer new relevant data for the study of neurocognitive improvement in HIV infection, as well will allow a better knowledge of clinical management of HIV-infected patients with CNS disease, an aspect that is a common clinical concern today.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, 08916
        • Fundació Lluita contra la Sida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ranged from 20 to 75 years old
  • Correct understanding of study objectives
  • Written consent signed
  • HIV infection confirmed by Western Blot or two ELISA tests
  • Existence of an HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder according to the diagnosis classification offered by Antinori and cols (Neurology, 2007)
  • Being on antiretroviral treatment.
  • Spanish/Catalan speaker.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To be on a treatment that may interact pharmacologically with any of the new drugs used in study arms.
  • Breastfeeding, pregnancy or fertile women willing to be pregnant.
  • Renal failure or severe cardiovascular disease.
  • Weakness, dehydration or severe sodium depletion.
  • Sick sinus syndrome or cardiac conduction disturbances (sinoatrial block or atrioventricular block).
  • Active duodenal or gastric ulcer.
  • Urinary obstruction.
  • Epilepsy.
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lithium
Lithium group: Patients who will initiate therapy with lithium, in tablets, beginning a 2-daily 400 mg dose, and changing further adjusting the dose according to drug levels in serum.
lithium, in tablets, beginning a 2-daily 400 mg dose, and changing further adjusting the dose according to drug levels in serum.
Active Comparator: Rivastigmine
rivastigmine, in transdermal patch administration, beginning a once-daily 4.6 mg dose, and changing further increasing the dose up to once-daily 9.5 mg.
rivastigmine, in transdermal patch administration, beginning a once-daily 4.6 mg dose, and changing further increasing the dose up to once-daily 9.5 mg.
No Intervention: Control group
Patients who will not initiate treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of persons with neurocognitive impairment in the different study groups
Time Frame: From screening to month 12
The main variable to consider is the existence of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment. Therefore, the percentage of persons with neurocognitive impairment in different study groups will be the main variable that will report on the improvement associated with new treatments.
From screening to month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events associated with the initiation of therapy and toxicity parameters
Time Frame: Week 2, month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Week 2, month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Emotional variables
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3, 6, 12.
Depression and anxiety symptoms will be assessed by HADS questionnaire.
Baseline, month 3, 6, 12.
Functional variables
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3, 6, 12.
A total of six scales assessing functional interference regarding activities of daily living, as well as self-reported neurocognitive functioning, will be measured.
Baseline, month 3, 6, 12.
Quality of life variables
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3, 6, 12.
Four dimensions concerning quality of life, evaluated by MOS-HIV questionnaire, and satisfaction scales, based on treatments and clinical status, will be evaluated.
Baseline, month 3, 6, 12.
Demographics
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infection

Clinical Trials on Lithium

3
Subscribe