Scan Hip Evaluation (ETOSA)

July 4, 2014 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Scan Evaluation at 9 Years of the Bone Acetabular Supporting Cups Without Cement (Couple Metal/Metal in Diameter 28 mm)

The couple of friction metal-polyethylene is regarded as the couple of reference in spite of the osteolysis induced by the wear of the polyethylene which remains the independent factor of long-term failure. This is all the more true as the patients are young, thus justifying the recourse to alternate couples of friction. The Metasul® couple was introduced on the French market under its current form in 1995 (year of its marking EC). The use of a couple of friction metal-metal (MM) is justified because it would be likely to improve longevity of the total arthroplasties of the active subjects by the reduction in osteolysis related to the wear of polyethylene. Various studies highlight evolutions different according to the types of fixing acetabular; favourable results of the not cemented cups contrasting with unsealings and the evolutionary edgings of the Metasul® cups cemented of or the cups "of cemented Weber type".

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Radiographies standards allow the follow-up of the total prostheses of hip but those underestimate the incidence and the extension of osteolyses perished-acetabular which are generally asymptomatic initially. The lack of international consensus on the definition of the parameters of interpretation of the radiological follow-up of the PTH makes difficult the comparison of the various results. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the presence of geodes acetabular and femoral with scan examination.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Chu Clermont-Ferrand

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Metal on metal hip arthroplasty operated on 2002
  • Age older than 40 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Expectant mothers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Realization of a scan nine years after the surgery of total hip arthroplasty
Time Frame: after nine years
after nine years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical results preoperative Postel Merle d'Aubigné, Harris score preoperative and SF12 scores preoperative (before the hip surgery)
Time Frame: after nine years
after nine years
Cooperating X-ray assessments and scan
Time Frame: after nine years
after nine years
Realization of a X-ray and a scan then comparison of the results obtained
Time Frame: after nine years
after nine years
Concentrations of cobalt: chrome and nickel in blood
Time Frame: after nine years
after nine years
Rate of survival of the prosthesis
Time Frame: after nine years
after nine years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephane Descamps, MD, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHU-089

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on Metal on metal hip arthroplasty operated on 2002

Subscribe