IMPROVE Critical Care Study (Pilot)

May 25, 2011 updated by: GE Healthcare

PILOT STUDY: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Care Management of Sedation Using Patient Responsiveness in Critical Care IMPROVE Critical Care Study Pilot

The Pilot Clinical Investigation planned is a prospective, unblinded randomized pilot trial comparing sedation management using a protocol based on responsiveness with standard sedation management. The hypothesis is that responsiveness will improve a range of patient-based and economic outcomes, including the duration of mechanical ventilation and duration of coma in the ICU. The purpose of the pilot study is to gather information for designing a full study that might show the validity of the outcome hypothesis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Scotland
      • Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
        • Royal Infirmary Edinburgh (Great Britain) ward 118

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients mechanically ventilated via an endotracheal tube and receiving intravenous sedation with a hypnotic agent (midazolam or other benzodiazepine) or propofol by continuous infusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary intracerebral disorder (includes cardiac arrest with probable hypoxic brain injury; intrac-ranial haemorrhage; head injury causing reduced conscious level prior to intubation)
  • Patient who is already awake at the time of enrolment defined as RASS ³ -1
  • Age <16 years
  • Patient not expected to survive the next 24 hours
  • Patient receiving long term ventilation prior to ICU admission
  • Patient with a long term tracheostomy prior to ICU admission
  • Patient transferred sedated and mechanically ventilated from another ICU unless recruitment is possible within 24 hours of first ICU admission
  • Patient receiving continuous neuromuscular blocking agent at the time of screening for enrolment
  • Previously enrolled in the trial during a separate ICU admission during this hospital stay
  • Status epilepticus
  • Confirmed meningitis or encephalitis at the time of screening for enrolment
  • Chronic neurological disease interfering with normal neuromuscular function, e.g. motor neurone disease, Guillain-Barre syndrome or inherited neuromyopathies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Standard practice
Experimental: Protocol
Using sedation monitoring and protocol
This is a pilot unblinded randomised controlled trial comparing sedation management using responsiveness (new intervention) with usual care (control group).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of time spent with low responsiveness (red colour code) during the first 48 hours in the ICU
Time Frame: 8 month period
The main purpose in the statistical analysis is not to test the statistical significance of the differences but to provide descriptive statistics for the full outcome study plan.
8 month period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of time spent with RASS score -4/-5 during the first 48 hours in the ICU.
Time Frame: 8 months
The main purpose in the statistical analysis is not to test the statistical significance of the differences but to provide descriptive statistics for the full outcome study plan.
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kimmo Uutela, PhD, GEHC
  • Principal Investigator: Timothy Walsh, PhD MD, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 26, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2011

Last Verified

May 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DOC0676170

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sedated ICU Patients

Clinical Trials on "Sedation Trial Monitor" is the name of the device used.

Subscribe