- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01361230
IMPROVE Critical Care Study (Pilot)
May 25, 2011 updated by: GE Healthcare
PILOT STUDY: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Care Management of Sedation Using Patient Responsiveness in Critical Care IMPROVE Critical Care Study Pilot
The Pilot Clinical Investigation planned is a prospective, unblinded randomized pilot trial comparing sedation management using a protocol based on responsiveness with standard sedation management.
The hypothesis is that responsiveness will improve a range of patient-based and economic outcomes, including the duration of mechanical ventilation and duration of coma in the ICU.
The purpose of the pilot study is to gather information for designing a full study that might show the validity of the outcome hypothesis.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
74
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Scotland
-
Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
- Royal Infirmary Edinburgh (Great Britain) ward 118
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients mechanically ventilated via an endotracheal tube and receiving intravenous sedation with a hypnotic agent (midazolam or other benzodiazepine) or propofol by continuous infusion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Primary intracerebral disorder (includes cardiac arrest with probable hypoxic brain injury; intrac-ranial haemorrhage; head injury causing reduced conscious level prior to intubation)
- Patient who is already awake at the time of enrolment defined as RASS ³ -1
- Age <16 years
- Patient not expected to survive the next 24 hours
- Patient receiving long term ventilation prior to ICU admission
- Patient with a long term tracheostomy prior to ICU admission
- Patient transferred sedated and mechanically ventilated from another ICU unless recruitment is possible within 24 hours of first ICU admission
- Patient receiving continuous neuromuscular blocking agent at the time of screening for enrolment
- Previously enrolled in the trial during a separate ICU admission during this hospital stay
- Status epilepticus
- Confirmed meningitis or encephalitis at the time of screening for enrolment
- Chronic neurological disease interfering with normal neuromuscular function, e.g. motor neurone disease, Guillain-Barre syndrome or inherited neuromyopathies
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
Standard practice
|
|
|
Experimental: Protocol
Using sedation monitoring and protocol
|
This is a pilot unblinded randomised controlled trial comparing sedation management using responsiveness (new intervention) with usual care (control group).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of time spent with low responsiveness (red colour code) during the first 48 hours in the ICU
Time Frame: 8 month period
|
The main purpose in the statistical analysis is not to test the statistical significance of the differences but to provide descriptive statistics for the full outcome study plan.
|
8 month period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of time spent with RASS score -4/-5 during the first 48 hours in the ICU.
Time Frame: 8 months
|
The main purpose in the statistical analysis is not to test the statistical significance of the differences but to provide descriptive statistics for the full outcome study plan.
|
8 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Kimmo Uutela, PhD, GEHC
- Principal Investigator: Timothy Walsh, PhD MD, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2010
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 25, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
May 26, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
May 26, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 25, 2011
Last Verified
May 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- DOC0676170
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sedated ICU Patients
-
Orion Corporation, Orion PharmaCompletedContinuous Sedation in Initially Sedated Adults in ICUNetherlands, Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Switzerland, United Kingdom
-
Orion Corporation, Orion PharmaCompletedContinuous Sedation in Initially Sedated Adults in ICUFinland, United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Russian Federation, Switzerland
-
Bayside HealthCompletedMechanically Ventilated Patients | Intensive Care | Sedated PatientsAustralia
-
Englewood Hospital and Medical CenterTerminated
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationOridionUnknownVentilatory Status of Deeply Sedated ERCP PatientsIsrael
-
University of LuebeckRecruiting
-
University of UtahCompleted
-
University Hospital, RouenCompletedSedated Patients | Critically Ill Patients Under Mechanical VentilationFrance
-
Lebanese American University Medical CenterUnknown
Clinical Trials on "Sedation Trial Monitor" is the name of the device used.
-
Tampa General HospitalWithdrawnEffect of Protocolized Sedation on Days of Mechanical Ventilation in the ICUUnited States
-
National Maternity Hospital, IrelandCompletedLabouring Parturients Requiring/Requesting Epidural Analgesia as Part of Their Peri-partum CareIreland
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific ResearchVA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedHemiparesisUnited States
-
University Hospital, AntwerpRecruitingBody Weight Changes | Children, Only | Fluid and Electrolyte ImbalanceBelgium
-
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit UniversityCompletedPostoperative Delirium | Preoperative AnxietyTurkey
-
Yale UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedObesity, ChildhoodUnited States
-
Odense University HospitalCompletedTranscranial Low Voltage Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (T-PEMF) in Patients With Parkinson's DiseaseParkinson DiseaseDenmark
-
Joel CoxNova Scotia Health AuthorityNot yet recruiting
-
Queen's UniversityAlexander Medical Inc.Completed