Early Clinical Results of Mobile-Bearing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (MBT)

October 22, 2019 updated by: Donnis Rafferty, Colorado Joint Replacement
Long term follow-up is needed to determine whether current Mobile Bearing revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) designs will improve implant longevity. The potential advantages of mobile bearings in the revision TKA setting include reduction in polyethylene wear, decreasing fixation stresses, and protection of the constraining mechanisms. Several studies have reported satisfactory clinical results after revision total knee arthroplasty but no study with a large number has specifically addressed the clinical outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty using the mobile bearing design

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Failure modes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that include prosthetic loosening and damage to constraining mechanisms often require revision TKA. Mobile bearing revision TKA components have been developed in hopes of lessening these failure mechanisms. Our purpose is to evaluate the use of mobile bearings in revision TKA.

Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 340 revision mobile bearing TKAs using the PFC Sigma and LCS posterior stabilized rotating platform implants (Depuy, Warsaw, IN) will be performed. Indications for revision include instability, loosening, arthrofibrosis, chronic hemarthrosis, failed patellofemoral replacement, failed unicompartmental knee replacement, infection reimplantation, and supracondylar fracture nonunion.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

340

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80210
        • Colorado Joint Replacement

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients of Colorado Joint Replacement

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Requiring a revision of a primary knee replacement. Indications for revision include instability, aseptic loosening, failed unicompartmental knee replacement, infection reimplantation, arthrofibroisis, chronic hemarthrosis, failed patellofemoral replacments, and non union of a supracondylar femur fracture.

Exclusion Criteria: None since they have all required a revision.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Function and knee score of the knee society scoring at every 2 years until 10 years.
Time Frame: 1-10 years post operative of revision
Follow up data of 1,2,4,6,8,and 10 years to evaluate bearing complications and clinical results for the use of MB in revision TKA. Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 197 mobile bearing revision TKA's will be collected. We will also analyze patient demographics and reason for revisions as well as implants used in revision.
1-10 years post operative of revision

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Radiographic analysis by our orthopedic clinician to determine component failure or loosening.
Time Frame: Post op - 1-10 years or revision surgery
Post op - 1-10 years or revision surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Colorado Joint Replacement

Collaborators

DePuy Orthopaedics

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raymond Kim, MD, Colorado Joint Replacement

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 21, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIS-000113

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Portugal

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe