Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry (ESD Registry)

November 7, 2012 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Establishment of Registry for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastrointestinal Neoplasia

The purpose of this study is to monitor the success rates and completion rates for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients referred for endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasia.

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients referred for endoscopic treatment of advanced gastrointestinal (colorectal, gastric, duodenal, esophagus) neoplasia, defined by any of the following procedures:

  1. Flat dysplastic lesion greater than 2cm(IIa or IIb by Paris classification)
  2. Flat depressed lesion < 2cm in size (llc by Paris Classification)
  3. Ulcerated lesion < 2cm (Paris type lll) staged as T1N0 on endoscopic ultrasound
  4. Upon resection, the criteria for curative ESD include:

    • Non-invasive neoplasia of differentiated carcinoma
    • No lymphovascular invasion
    • Intramucosal cancer or minute submucosal cancer <1 mm invasion (sm1)
    • Negative deep and lateral margins.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of antiplatelet(e.g. clopidrogel) or anticoagulation (e.g. Coumadin) agents that cannot be withheld for at least 7 days prior to the procedure. Aspirin use is accepted according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for these procedures.
  2. Patients who refuse or who are unable to consent.
  3. Suboptimal colon prep, or solid gastric residual that precludes safe lesion resection at the time of endoscopy.
  4. Lesion location in a segment of the colon not conducive to ESD, including significant narrowing, tortuosity and/or extensive diverticular disease, as determined by the endoscopist.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ease of use of the overall procedure and Time of procedure.
Time Frame: 1 Year
  • Ease of use of overall procedure as rated on a 5-point visual analog scale for very easy, easy, neutral, difficult and very difficult.
  • Time (in minutes) needed to resect the lesion completely, as measured from the first injection to final excision of the lesion.
1 Year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications and Rate of Completion
Time Frame: 1 Year
  • Minor and Major Bleeding
  • Minor and Major perforation
  • Post-polypectomy syndrome (defined as the presence of moderate or severe pain persisting more than 2 hours following completion of the procedure).
  • Other(any other adverse event which the investigator feels is potentially attributable to the procedure).
  • Enbloc resection of all endoscopically visible neoplasia
  • Pathologically negative for lateral and/or deep margins
  • Absence of residual neoplasia confirmed by repeat standard colonscopy and biopsy of ESD site 3-6 months following the index procedure.
1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael B Wallace, MD,MPH, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

3
Subscribe