Person-Centered Oncology Care and Choices (P-COCC): Piloting and Initial Randomized Testing of a Combined Values Narrative Interview and Video Education Advance Care Planning Program in Gastrointestinal Oncology Patients

January 17, 2020 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

This study is being done to get individuals' feedback on advanced care planning and decision making.

This study is divided into two parts (Part 1 and Part 2). The purpose of Part 1 is to survey people to find out what is important to people with advanced cancer (again, their values, such as their goals, concerns and sources of support). This has never been done before in the way the investigators are doing it, and that is why this is called a "pilot" study, which is where a new method or treatment is being created and evaluated.

The purpose of Part 2 is to see if combining a medical options video with a short interview about values helps people with how they feel about their medical situation, and what they know about their medical options for their medical situation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

178

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States, 07920
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering at Basking Ridge
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to speak, read and understand English well enough to complete study assessments and interviews in the judgement of the consenting professional
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Be seen regularly (at least monthly) at an MSKCC GI medical oncology clinic
  • Has an exocrine GI cancer with MSKCC pathology confirmation at the primary or metastatic anatomic site
  • Non-metastatic GI cancers are eligible only if the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status54 is 2,3, or 4 at the time of consent (although patients with locally advanced [stage III] and inoperable pancreatic cancers are eligible regardless of their performance status)
  • Has a metastatic neuroendocrine histology with MSKCC pathology confirmation as moderately or poorly differentiated or intermediate or high grade
  • A referring physician's estimate of patient life expectancy must be between 1-12 months. We use this life expectancy range in order to ensure some degree of subject homogeneity for the purpose of sample size and methodologic design. Also, these timeframes were chosen in order to test an intervention in patients with serious illness (under 1 year prognosis).
  • Part 2 Only: Did not complete Part 1 of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) score of less than "intact mental functioning" (3 or more errors).
  • Significant psychiatric or cognitive disturbance sufficient, in the consenting professional's or investigator's judgment, to preclude providing informed consent or participating in the interventions (i.e., acute psychiatric symptoms which require individual treatment).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: First 24 patients Cognitive interviewing
Part 1 - This first study phase will involve interviewing 24 patients to ask for their feedback on the appropriateness of questions being developed for use in the narrative interviewing in part 2 of the study. The cognitive interview will be audio-recorded. Demographics and ECOG performance status will be recorded prior to the cognitive interview.
Part 1 participants will be scheduled for their single pilot interview. There are no additional assessments.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: usual care
As outlined ECOG performance status will be recorded at the time of registration without the subject's involvement. Quality of life, treatment satisfaction, distress and peacefulness will also be recorded at baseline. Subjects will neither be shown the goals-of-care (GOC) video nor undergo the narrative interview process - they will be contacted as per re-assessment.
Subjects in the usual care arm will neither be given the narrative stem nor watch the video.
Will be a proof-of-concept, small scale, RCT to measure P-COCC acceptability and other quantitative and qualitative effects. Seventy five participants will be randomized to Usual Care, Video, or Video and Interview.
EXPERIMENTAL: video-only arm
As outlined ECOG performance status will be recorded at the time of registration without the subject's involvement. Quality of life, treatment satisfaction, distress and peacefulness will also be recorded at baseline. Subjects will be shown the goals-of-care (GOC) video but not undergo a narrative interview process - they will be contacted as per re-assessment.
Will be a proof-of-concept, small scale, RCT to measure P-COCC acceptability and other quantitative and qualitative effects. Seventy five participants will be randomized to Usual Care, Video, or Video and Interview.
Subjects will be shown the goals-of-care (GOC) video but not undergo a narrative interview process - they will be contacted as per re-assessment.
EXPERIMENTAL: combined narrative and video (P-COCC) arm
As outlined ECOG performance status will be recorded at the time of registration without the subject's involvement. Quality of life, treatment satisfaction, distress and peacefulness will also be recorded at baseline. subjects will watch the goals-of-care (GOC) video (described in detail in the next paragraph) and then be given the narrative question stem vetted/assessed in part 1 including any changes made to that stem in the process of Part 1 testing. Subjects in P-COCC arm will then be contacted for a telephone interview and audio-taping of their narrative. Interviews will be semi- structured and based off the narrative stem that subjects were previously given for review. Interviews will last approximately 30-45 minutes and will be conducted by staff from the MSKCC Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences.
Will be a proof-of-concept, small scale, RCT to measure P-COCC acceptability and other quantitative and qualitative effects. Seventy five participants will be randomized to Usual Care, Video, or Video and Interview.
subjects will watch the goals-of-care (GOC) video (described in detail in the next paragraph) and then be given the narrative question stem vetted/assessed in part 1 including any changes made to that stem in the process of Part 1 testing. Subjects in P-COCC arm will then be contacted for a telephone interview and audio-taping of their narrative. Interviews will be semi- structured and based off the narrative stem that subjects were previously given for review. Interviews will last approximately 30-45 minutes and will be conducted by staff from the MSKCC Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences,

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assess the acceptability of this piloted P-COCC intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
primary outcome is assessed in Part 2 of the study, and is acceptability of this newly- developed P-COCC intervention, as measured by subjects in P-COCC arm who will complete three Likert scale questions examining the degree to which they found the narrative recording process.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quantitative analyses
Time Frame: 2 years
pre-post scoring on our various psychometric questionnaires (quantitative) and of the subject responses during narrative interviewing (qualitative)
2 years
qualitative analyses
Time Frame: 2 years
pre-post scoring on our various psychometric questionnaires (quantitative) and of the subject responses during narrative interviewing (qualitative)
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Epstein, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer

Clinical Trials on single pilot interview

3
Subscribe