Impact of Controlling Vascular Risk Factors on the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease (COVARAD)

May 23, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Lille
Three quarters of patients with Alzheimer's disease have at least one vascular risk factor (VRF). Vascular brain lesions are present in most Alzheimer's patients (especially older ones). This cerebrovascular disease potentiates Alzheimer's lesions in early-stage disease. Many research studies have shown that VRFs are also risk factors for Alzheimer's disease; this is true for arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia in particular and, to a lesser extent, diabetes and cardiopathy. Moreover, recent drug trials (SYST-EUR, PROGRESS and HOPE) have indicated that antihypertensive medications can prevent the appearance of dementia (and notably Alzheimer's disease) in over-60 hypertensive subjects. An observational study of 233 Alzheimer's patients with an average follow-up period of 4 years has shown that the annual decline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was lower in patients in whom all the VRFs were being treated than in patients in whom no VRFs were being treated (1.5 ± 2.5 points versus 2.5 ± 2 points, respectively; p<0.04).1 However, it is not currently known whether optimal treatment of VRFs can influence the progression and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease. Answering this question could have a significant impact on public health.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is not currently known whether the optimum treatment of VRFs influences the progression and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease. Our starting hypothesis is that VRF control in Alzheimer's patients is associated with slower cognitive decline, less intense loss of personnel independence and fewer adverse events over the course of the disease (cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, behavioural disorders, caregiver burden, hospitalization and death).

COVARAD study is a randomized, controlled, multicentre study comparing 2 VRF care strategies in mild-to-moderate (MMSE > 18) Alzheimer's disease patients with at least one VRF. The objective of this work is to evaluate the effect of "optimal" care strategy, in strict compliance with the French HAS guidelines concerning targets for blood pressure, glycaemia and blood lipid levels, on the cognitive function in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's patients (MMSE score > 18), in comparison with a control group (i.e. receiving standard care from a primary care physician). The study test the hypothesis whereby "optimal" care of the 3 main modifiable VRFs is associated with slower cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease patients (evaluated on the ADAS-cog score), when compared with standard care and to compare the MMSE, MoCA and VADAS-cog scores, mood and behaviour (MADRS and NPI), loss of independence (ADCS-ADL), the occurrence of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, the number and length of hospitalisations, caregiver burden (on the Zarit scale), institutionalization and survival in the two groups (i.e. depending whether VRFs are managed optimally or not).

This study could influence clinical practice. If VRF control does have an influence on the progression of Alzheimer's disease, an information campaign could modify practice and have a significant impact on public health.

An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board will be set up to monitor the diabetic patients, in view of the risks related to "optimal" care (ACCOR and ADVANCE studies). Nevertheless, the risk of adverse events will be limited by raising the threshold value for glycated haemoglobin to 8%.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

304

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France
        • CHU Amiens Picardie
      • Arras, France
        • CH ARRAS
      • Boulogne-sur-Mer, France
        • CH Boulogne
      • Béthune, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Bethune Beuvry
      • Calais, France
        • Ch Calais -
      • Denain, France
        • CH de DENAIN
      • Douai, France
        • CH de DOUAI
      • Dunkerque, France
        • Ch Dunkerque
      • Le Quesnoy, France
        • CH Le Quesnoy
      • Lens, France
        • Ch Dr.Schaffner de Lens
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • CMRR Lille hopital Roger Salengro
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Hôpital des Bâteliers, CHU
      • Lomme, France
        • CH Saint-Philibert, GHICL
      • Paris, France
        • Hu Paris Centre Site Broca Aphp - Paris
      • Roubaix, France
        • CH de Roubaix
      • Rouen, France
        • CHU Rouen
      • Saint-Omer, France
        • Ch Region de St-Omer
      • Seclin, France
        • Groupe Hospitalier Seclin Carvin -
      • Talence, France, 33404
        • Chu de Bordeaux - Talence
      • Tourcoing, France
        • Ch Tourcoing
      • Valenciennes, France
        • Ch Valenciennes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects aged 60 or over
  • Subjects with Alzheimer's disease, according to the NINCDS/ADRDA diagnostic criteria 71
  • MMSE > 18
  • Subjects with at least one VRF (whether treated or not): arterial hypertension (defined as SBP/DBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg in at least three different consultations or, for ambulatory measurements, > 130/80 mmHg with a Holter recorder or > 135/85 mmHg with a self-measurement device), type 2 diabetes (defined as a glycaemia value over 1.26 g/l (7 mmol/l) after an 8-hour fast (confirmed on two occasions), dyslipidaemia (defined as an LDL cholesterol level > 1.6 g/l or 1.3 or 1 g/l, depending on the patient's risk level)
  • Subjects having agreed to participate in the study (provision of informed consent).
  • Subjects accompanied by a person likely to provide information on the patient (during the visit or over the phone).

Exclusion criteria

  • Any other disease that might interfere with the evaluation of cognitive disorders.
  • No formal education or a poor understanding of French (interfering with administration of the neuropsychological tests).
  • Major physical problems likely to interfere with administration of the tests (poor eyesight, hearing, etc.).
  • Non-Alzheimer's dementia (isolated vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, etc.)
  • Psychotropic drugs likely to modify the patient's non-stabilized cognitive state.
  • Patients with a history of cardiovascular events can be included (randomization will be balanced in terms of this criterion).
  • Participation in a therapeutic clinical trial during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: standard care
Follow up with city doctor with recommendation HAS French guidelines
AD patients will be followed with the city doctor and the letter t will be send for remember French HAS guidelines
Experimental: optimal care of VRF
Monitoring according to the strict recommendations of the HAS French guidelines
VRF of AD patients will be treated optimally in strict compliance with the French HAS guidelines concerning targets for blood pressure, glycaemia and blood lipid levels, in accordance with standardized therapeutic regimens.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
ADAS-Cog
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
MMSE
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
MoCA
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
VADAS-Cog
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Trail Making Test
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
ADL-ADCS
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
IADL
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
MADRS
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
NPI
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Zarit Inventory of Burden
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Florence PASQUIER, MD, Univ Lille Nord de France, clinique neurologique, Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherche - CHRU Lille
  • Principal Investigator: Marie-Anne MACKOWIAK, MD, Univ Lille Nord de France, clinique neurologique, Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherche - CHRU Lille
  • Principal Investigator: Didier HANNEQUIN, MD, CHU Rouen
  • Principal Investigator: Olivier GODEFROY, MD, CHU Amiens
  • Principal Investigator: Muriel RAINFRAY, MD, CHU Bordeaux

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2008_28/0914
  • 2009-A00269-48 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number, ANSM)
  • PHRC 2008/1925 (Other Identifier: DGOS, Ministry of Health, France)
  • B90419-40 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on standard care

Subscribe